Notices
04-06 Ralliart Engine/Drivetrain (no forced induction)

ACCOLADE - RPW 4-1 Header System Prototype Pics Released !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #196  
Mitsiman's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 697
Likes: 1
From: Perth, Western Australia
Thanks for that updated info PR_Mivec. I wasn't at any time disputing your results, but that now does make more sense. So to clarify for everyone, including myself and confirm this if you can, the results you got with the computer in pure stock form matched the results we showed on our own test car - which is arond a 5 - 7hp gain approx across teh board, with a very similiary almost identical torque curve?

You are saying, and please correct me if I am wrong, when you tried to use an altered ECU values, that you then lost the horsepower and down low etc.

IF so thats great that yuo have the ability to mod the ECU - cause that will definitly enable you to tweak it to its maximun. Don't be shy either giving it some more ignition timing as well if you are able to.

And I didn't again, beleive you were bashing the product. Your reveiw came across as honest and straight forward. I was just trying to see what the variations were between our test car and your vehicle to ascertain what the differences were and the reason for the large differences. Every mod we did to our test car provided substantial gains.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 08:10 PM
  #197  
PR_Mivec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Rico
yes when i used the alterations the performance dropped, im correcting it this week so lets see if we here can make he magic work...
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 09:19 AM
  #198  
MikeyD's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
yo pR mivec did you install them yourself or did you have a bodyshop/ someone else do it for ya?
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 02:12 PM
  #199  
PR_Mivec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Rico
i did it the only out of the ordinary int he instalation is to take out the front mount and the cros bar that holds it... is a 10 15 minute thing

Last edited by PR_Mivec; May 22, 2006 at 02:14 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 03:22 PM
  #200  
KreepaEvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Ponce P.R.
PR_Mivec, tune that thang up so we can see some results. I will be correcting computer values as well, so I can do a setting with 93 octane and another on race gas, at least for general tuning purposes, since I will be installing that RPW cam when its due. So that will be setting again....but thats all the fun about it.

I recon you met my friend Berto aka LAncerGrisTurbo, for some parts good luck with the setup. Im doing some research as well with the intake manifold.

I bet that the results you had were N/A, no nitrous runs? MAybe it will do wonders that way
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 03:26 PM
  #201  
ralliart rocks's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: st pete fl
so if i had cai, cat back 2.25 rrm piggyback would i not gain any power by haveing the header is it worth the money with just the mods i have
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 03:56 PM
  #202  
KreepaEvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Ponce P.R.
PR doesnt have a piggy to my knowledge at least not RRM's.

Youll just have to adjust to get THE MAXIMUM performance for it, thats the big header they talk about optimized for continous tuning
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #203  
ralliart329's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
can you do any value changing without a piggyback? and either way how hard is it to learn the interface? im good with pcs and all but don't know much about the compression ratios and all thatin a car....
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 05:34 PM
  #204  
Mitsiman's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 697
Likes: 1
From: Perth, Western Australia
The results to date that we have seen with our own test car is yes, you will still get enhanced performance with the headers without a programmable ecu system. Again refer to the dyno sheets we have posted with the header package. Also remember that the hp gains are not the only thing this header is doing. Speak with Chowetime who has had a chance to do extensive driving with these on the vehicle.

The vehicle rev's harder, rev's quicker, so much quicker it was continually hitting the rev limiter, increased acceleration, much better throttle response etc.

The main thing is if you have for example a pre programmed piggy back ecu, then this will not work with the header package, it WILL LOSE HORSEPOWER because it is not optimised with the header package. When it is reporgrammed to suit the package you will be fine.

That is the main thing to remember with this - this goes for any vehicle, not just the RA model lancer.

I fully expect that with our test car when we go to do some tuning, it will have some very impressive results with the headers and tuning with a cold air induction kit. But that will still be several weeks away.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 06:53 PM
  #205  
KreepaEvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Ponce P.R.
I imagine that with that header and a good catback and a 75 shot will produce great numbers due to the enhanced scavenging effect. add a ported intake mani and voila. Low 13's
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 04:16 AM
  #206  
chowetime's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
From: Western Australia
Originally Posted by chowetime
I took the Lancer to the track again over the weekend with the much bigger Header installed now from bog stock with nothing done at all to the car it ran a 16.2 @ 137klm with the catback and smaller headers the car ran a 15.7 sec @ 141klm and with the much larger headers and cat back it ran 15.5 sec @ 144klm.

I know these numbers may not seem like a huge increase in times but when looking at what has been to the car which is nothing except exhaust and headers a .700 seconds for this mod is very respectable and an increase in speed of 7klm is also very good.

I did notice that the car felt a bit sluggish in the lower rpm points but was hell quick in the upper in fact almost too quick I found that in third gear I ran out of rpm's before hitting the rev limiter which I did on a number of occassions which may of cost me on alot of runs {guesstimated 0.150 sec} but the interesting thing is when I compare all of my times on spread sheets my 60ft and 330 ft times are very good as well there were improvements the track conditions deteriated very rapidly during the day most because we are coming into winter here so the track was quiet cold for grip - I beleive that RPW are dynoing the car Monday and will post up some more results but it is deffinately going to be suitable for those wanting or have done more air mods as this thing is very thirsty for air - which was another restriction on my times as I have no intake setup apart from factory stock
this quote was taken from page 10 of this thread there is more that I have added to it on the same page you should checkout what was said

I see many people are questioning how good these headers are and how much Hp has been achieved.. I mean why would you not question the results I know they are not huge gains so sure it may seem a little disappointing but I seriously doubt that there is another manufacturer that can claim much more than 10hp just from header mod on it's own... and for many years you have all been requesting from other companies to manufacture something for the car and all have said "too hard" " too expensive" "no gains can be made" ect ect...

Now RPW have made a set of headers and other companies have decided that maybe there is some gains to be made so perhaps they should make some as well... Like RPW have said I have been driving around with these headers for a couple of weeks now and I can feel the difference in the way the car drives via several ways
1) the car revs so much easier
2) much more throttle responsive
3) does not feel like it is choked up anymore
The choice is really up to the individual as to whether they will wait and see more results before saying the product does not work.... personally I think I am pretty lucky being possibly the only person with an RA driving around with a full production set of race design headers.

When I first got the car I will admit that I was very disappointed with it, now that I have the headers and full exhaust I am so much happier with the car, that is how much of a difference the headers have made to the car... I know your not supposed to post up here about street racing but I have to admit that everytime I see what could be a quick car I am ready to take them on and chalk up another kill.

I really do urge you all to wait a little longer and wait for the next lot of results before you make a judgement on them -

regards Christine
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 06:25 AM
  #207  
ralliart329's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Yeah the reason i was asking is b/c im in debate as to what my next mod would be and both the ECU and header are on the top of my list. i'm leading towards the header first b/c i don't know enough yet to start programing the ecu.
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 09:30 AM
  #208  
MikeKondilis's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
Sorry if these has been answered yet but there is a lot of pages to read through so are there and gains from these headers and will they connect with the RRM downpipe??
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 09:35 AM
  #209  
DangerousDan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
you can't program/flash/replace the ecu, unless you are of the family of the PR genius that passed away with this knowledge (custom ECU I believe)

as of now, RPW and RRM have add on (piggyback) devices that can control certain signals going ?(to or from)? the ECU. AEM has standalone engine management for somewhere around 3000USD but I have not heard of anyone using it on the RA.
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 09:37 AM
  #210  
DangerousDan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
sorry Mike, the gains are in the last page or so, and no you can't use it with the DP. Both RPW and RRM have designed the header to be longer and therefore produce more power(hopefully) and don't connect to the downpipe in the same manner or location.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:24 AM.