Notices
04-06 Ralliart Engine/Drivetrain (no forced induction)

ROAD/RACE- Cam and Ported Head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #406  
MITVRX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
From: Australia
^ Yes please sir!
Reply
Old May 11, 2007 | 06:55 AM
  #407  
Diavlo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: UK
I fully intend to get the RRM head and cam, along with the Turbo (which I will probably be after first). Im just sidetracked at the moment with a load of custom work on the car! I know however they'll both be great, RRM stuff always is!
Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #408  
ROCK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Here is a head shot done!

ROAD/RACE

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=247589

Someone said there was no pic so here it is again.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #409  
PR_Mivec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Rico
here you go..

Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 04:03 PM
  #410  
MITVRX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
From: Australia
^ Looking gooooood!
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 07:53 AM
  #411  
ralliart329's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Shiny!!!
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #412  
pabboost's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: pa/md
im buying the cam tomm so i will let u guys know how it is with a turbo setup
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 05:52 PM
  #413  
MITVRX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Apparently its not good with a turbo setup. I read somewhere that a turbo setup would prefer the stock cams or something rather.

Mistake me if I'm wrong, or better yet ask ROCK.
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 06:01 PM
  #414  
MITVRX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
From: Australia
An after flicking back a few pages...

Originally Posted by retro
I was reading in a book on aftermarket turbo setups that sometimes it's better to keep stock cams because trubos don't like big overlap and longer durrations which is the normal setup on on NA.

Not sure of the specs on these cams, but for sure I'm going to get the head installed... I'll give you a call ROCK!!!
I dug that up!
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #415  
ROCK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
I am going to disagree. Why did I and thousands of guys buy cams for their EVOs? One of the best mods done to that motor.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 06:39 PM
  #416  
MITVRX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
From: Australia
So I guess putting the EVO aside, the RA will be fine with this setup, sounds good!
Reply
Old May 14, 2007 | 03:00 AM
  #417  
reTro's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by ROCK
I am going to disagree. Why did I and thousands of guys buy cams for their EVOs? One of the best mods done to that motor.

ROAD/RACE
I guess I need to clarify... the book said that most aftermarket turbo kits performed worse or no better when mated with a cam(s) that were originally ground for NA setup.
Reply
Old May 14, 2007 | 04:15 AM
  #418  
ralliart329's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
if the cam is made with a turbo RA in mind it should help. this was another reason rock had explained to me he went with a milder cam so they could spec it so it would help both the n/a and turbo guys.
Reply
Old May 14, 2007 | 07:09 AM
  #419  
bruce988jl's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 1
From: Boston, MA
man that's a lot of flipping of pages to do... but the parts look good, didn't really read anything but the first and last page but saw the pictures of the head and wow. I wonder how it'll do if i just wanted to stay N/A....

EDIT:
I've got no life at work, i just spent the last 3 hours reading through the last 28 pages of this thread... word for word, i could probably write a book report on it too.

Summary for those who didn't bother to read it
Conclusion: No one with the Head has spoken up, not even Manny.. hint hint
The Camshaft does good, but needs a possible tune.. Ralliart234(?) thinks he gained about 10 whp and a "buttload of tq"
The pricing for the parts is right, given the amount of hours spent on research and development and labor. I work in a firm that makes 95% of the electric hookups for trailers on trucks/suvs/etc. The amount of hours that it put into just an o-ring design and its seating position is insane. So imagine a full head job or a camshaft. Granted they're in different fields (engine vs accessories) they both require a pretty decent amount of time and commitment, along with which comes pricing.

RRM will no longer be R&D on new parts for the lancer RA but will continue to manufacture parts until demand dissapears.

A lot of arguing about pricing, and quality. I think everyones made up and kissed by now though...

Last edited by bruce988jl; May 14, 2007 at 01:05 PM.
Reply
Old May 14, 2007 | 02:30 PM
  #420  
ralliart329's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Manny had a thread on the head...read it, try a search.

and yes i need to tune my ECU for a better AFR.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:23 AM.