Notices
04-06 Ralliart Engine/Drivetrain (no forced induction)

Cylinder Head project !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 02:40 PM
  #181  
boozeup&riot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: you-taw
Originally Posted by migueralliart
IIRC? you mean WRX?

EDIT : Ohh and with the camshaft I am pretty sure I will be hitting .60 duty cycle on 440cc injectors . People don't believe that much in NA engines nowadays, but they can still suck a lot of **** into them hehehe


Migue - unless I'm misunderstanding the context here: IIRC= If I recall correctly.

If thats not what you mean... well, hell I've been really good at misunderstanding people lately heh.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #182  
DangerousDan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
yeah, if I recall correctly the WRX injectors that I purchased from a guy on NASIOC will flow 440cc, they are the stock injectors for his vehicle and everything is supposed to fit, maybe with a washer according to someone I talked to. the stock wrx injectors are light blue, not pink (those are for the STI, and don't fit our rail as far as I have been told

Injectors are rated at flow/minute at X pressure, three variables. you can use more fuel pressure to increase the amount of fuel at a certain duty cycle, to a point. With 440cc injectors Migue should be fine up to 300HP at 80%-90% duty cycle, and I haven't looked at the chart so that's a guess, with an adjustable fuel pressure system. That is a good injector size to meet his target of 250, if he goes over 50 he has at least a 15% margin before he needs to upgrade those injectors.

Just FYI
As the injector reaches it's maximum duty cycle at any fuel pressure the injector is held open constantly, and therefore can flow no more fuel at that pressure. The goal is to balance an injector with the available fuel pressure that will allow a 75% to 80% duty cycle at your HP rating.

the closer to the max duty cycle the more likely you will suffer fuel starvation because the time between opening and closing the injector is so small, fuel delivery is more and more difficult to increase unless pressure is added to assist the injectors. that's why you want a decent margin away from your duty cycle.

Last edited by DangerousDan; Jun 14, 2007 at 03:47 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #183  
migueralliart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
So in other words stock injectors will max out @ 200 Crank power but if you raise pressure changing the returnless system you might go up a little
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 04:55 PM
  #184  
DangerousDan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
yes, you should be able to push more fuel with the stock injectors, but I doubt it will cover what you are looking for. it looks like your calculator there will do the math for you
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 04:57 PM
  #185  
DangerousDan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
and that's not maxed out, per say, it's just within a reasonable limit on the stock injectors at 200chp.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #186  
migueralliart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Ok here are some pics of the IM ported already I just got here and I am tired I will try to post tomorrow before and after IM runners . They port the **** out of it....
BTW it is not finished I still have to clean it up and ceramic coat it and then red painting.....

They matched the ports up to gasket and deeper in the manifold as they could...






Last edited by migueralliart; Jun 14, 2007 at 10:10 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 10:43 PM
  #187  
PR_Mivec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Rico
interesting
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 10:44 PM
  #188  
boozeup&riot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: you-taw
migue and dan, just so that I understand everything (thanks for your patience) that you are saying: with the stock fuel system, we are good for just a little over 200 atc safely, but thats kinda pushing it. If I understand things correctly, with a stock WRX injectors, he should be good for 300 hp. I apologize if this is a completely stupid question, but:
He's going to be running the smt-6. Will an FPR be necessary here, or is that all taken care of by the smt unit? - my understanding of this stuff is obviously very limited.

Migue, you suggested changing the returnless fuel system - I assume you mean going to a return system...? If so, were you just going to do the part from the OZ fuel pump, or did you have something else in mind?

Basically, I'm wondering what plans you had in mind exactly for delivering fuel safely. This is one thing that I just don't seem to completely understand. People start talking about duty cycles and something inside just cries a little heh.

The reason why I ask in such detail simply so that I'm able to wrap my brain around the whole thing. Again thanks as always for the patient answer.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 10:52 PM
  #189  
migueralliart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by boozeup&riot
migue and dan, just so that I understand everything (thanks for your patience) that you are saying: with the stock fuel system, we are good for just a little over 200 atc safely, but thats kinda pushing it. If I understand things correctly, with a stock WRX injectors, he should be good for 300 hp. I apologize if this is a completely stupid question, but:
He's going to be running the smt-6. Will an FPR be necessary here, or is that all taken care of by the smt unit? - my understanding of this stuff is obviously very limited.

Migue, you suggested changing the returnless fuel system - I assume you mean going to a return system...? If so, were you just going to do the part from the OZ fuel pump, or did you have something else in mind?

Basically, I'm wondering what plans you had in mind exactly for delivering fuel safely. This is one thing that I just don't seem to completely understand. People start talking about duty cycles and something inside just cries a little heh.

The reason why I ask in such detail simply so that I'm able to wrap my brain around the whole thing. Again thanks as always for the patient answer.
Well , first yes stock WRX serve as up to 300 .. the SMt-6 will adjust for this and a FPR wont be needed , this is only needed for NOS or TUrbo. If I were to upgrade something else it will be posted in here but right now I only need to upgrade the Injectors,,,
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #190  
MITVRX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Nice, good job Migue!

Coming along just beautiful... your kung fu is too strong!
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 04:42 AM
  #191  
DangerousDan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by boozeup&riot

Basically, I'm wondering what plans you had in mind exactly for delivering fuel safely. This is one thing that I just don't seem to completely understand. People start talking about duty cycles and something inside just cries a little heh.

simplest way to put it:

duty cycle is the percentage of time the injectors remain open in a pulse. even wide open all the time the injectors will only flow what they can handle with the stock setup. the holes are only so big, as are the fuel passages.

you can change injectors, to get bigger holes and passages. you need to tune for the new injectors, but we can't flash the ECU so we have to tune the fuel itself with a piggyback.

if you add more fuel pressure, you can force more fuel through the injectors up to a point.

if you change injectors and add more pressure your fuel supply will increase even more.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 08:45 AM
  #192  
migueralliart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Before and after pics :



Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #193  
boozeup&riot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: you-taw
that is quite a difference.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 09:20 AM
  #194  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
Big diffrence
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 09:35 AM
  #195  
DangerousDan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
I can't see stupid work.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:48 AM.