^ No, that was never the argument. It was that in some possible combination of events (stock vette, modded RA, terrible 'vette Driver etc) that the RA would stand a chance, not even win, just a chance. Then others came in and took it away with some rants, nonsense, cheap shots etc.

 

+1, exactly.
Mostly from non-ra drivers lol.

 

dude.. you talk like non- ra drivers are stupid

 

No kidding, it's as if only people blessed with a RA know anything about cars. Well, as my sig shows, even those with RAs don't know about RAs.

 

Physics doesn't apply to the Ralliart.

 

I'm beginning to understand that, they're the new SRT-4.

 

DUDE...no we aren't. You have to admit it's a little more frustrating when the conversation is steered into oblivion by people who don't even own the car being spoken about. We don't claim to know it all about the car, or at least the majority of us don't.

 

The same could be said about people who don't own a Corvette talking about 13.X second 1/4 times.

 

Sure. Had be we been in a Corvette forum, I agree.

 

So since it's a Mitsubishi forum it's OK to talk about cars we don't own as long as they're not a Lancer? I have a feeling people would **** a brick if this topic came up on NASIOC and people spoke poorly of the RA.

 

theres plenty of corvettes that do 13.x 1/4's.
If I own it or not. It's a fact, sorry Amby I still love you.

And, I don't think anyone is speaking "highly/super car" of the RA.

 

Sure, and there are Ralliarts that run 15s, hardly a fair comparison now is it? I'm sure RA guys would cry bloodly murder if a Lancer owner claimed they beat a stock RA with a 15.1 1/4 mile time.

 

^ No, cause I'm sure it's possible.

 

sure, there's always whiners.
But save it for the track, and find out for yourself, right?

 

I know many of the RA owners here would ***** and moan and make the very claims I have (that it's clearly a result of driver error). Hell, some RA owners would challenge the Lancer owner to an e-thug fight.