Notices
ECU Flash

Starting to tune.. logs and such inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #46  
jcsbanks's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 6
From: UK
Definitely. Try looking at your map on a graphical view. Then look at a factory map. Do the same for fuelling and timing. The factory maps are wondrous to behold and a lesson in smoothness and many other things. The maps posted look like designs for a new third world nation's flag

Factory knows best unless there is a reason to change it. The two big ones are MAF calibration and injector scaling. Get these right and mapping a MAF based ECU is a pleasure for fuelling - literally it should only take two or three shots at it once you have the cruise areas correct. If there is no wacky induction you'll be amazed how a MAF sensor can really measure airflow to fuel well for cams, turbo, strokers, exhausts.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 01:03 PM
  #47  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by justchil
Ok so I'm heading home now.. Big thanks to everyone will all the help/suggestions. Keep them coming if you have time.
IMO I think you will run rich at idle and low loads. Maybe throw the P0172 rich bank 1 code.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 02:27 PM
  #48  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by jcsbanks
Personally, I couldn't bear to try to modify a map like this, I'd have to chuck it in the bin!

I'd start with a standard factory map and get the idle and cruise areas on minimal fuel trim adjustments by adjusting the injector scaling. I'd do this with a wideband, knock monitoring and with boost controllers set to give just actuator pressure. I wouldn't even think about boosting it until I'd got all this right.

Then I would move on to map a low boost setting - initially with safe ignition timing I'd get the AFRs correct then sort the timing, but I wouldn't bother too much about it as with sensible induction you should have sensible timing.

Then I would increase the boost to my final level again with safe timing and again get the AFR correct. 11-11.5:1 on full boost on pump fuel should be safe at all RPMs. Then I'd sort the timing.

I'd develop the map as I went along so every direction was silky smooth in terms of progression.

Then I'd go batter hell out of the car on a hot day to make sure it was safe before considering the map finished, or I'd detune it to be sure.

Just my 2p.
Exactly. This is exactly how I tune my car. Get the car running great with low loads (lower boost) then increase and tune from there.

Start from the factory maps, those maps you posted are a mess. Save yourself some headaches.

that 19.6 at 4500 in the low loads is ??????????????????????????????

I bet your fuel trims are all over the place with that map.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 03:01 PM
  #49  
justchil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Well I've got a start here guys thanks to noogles.. I've the idle decent.. I'm too lean tho. Going to turn boost down as low as I can and work on it some more. I'm stilling trying to find a way to teach myself how exactly boost/vac levels compare to load.

Got more changes to go test out

Only thing that scares me is flashing the ecu so many times :\

Last edited by justchil; Jun 23, 2006 at 03:01 PM. Reason: it's noogles not noodles :)
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #50  
Noogles's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal (LA County)
ive flashed my ecu about 200 times now and it's still perfect.

like i said send me your log and i'll take a look at it. we might just have to add a point or two of fuel,

how were your EGT's?

don't turn the boost down you should tune the car at the boost your going to drive it at or else it'll be off when you turn it up.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 04:07 PM
  #51  
justchil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Well it was too lean to go to far with it... The car isnt drive well enough part throttle/idle to really go to far just yet..

I'm taking a break for a few.. starting to get dizzy from all the fumes!
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #52  
justchil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Big thanks to noogles. AFR is pretty damn close now.. timing probably needs adjusted a bit.


Last edited by justchil; Jun 27, 2006 at 07:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #53  
justchil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
I want to thank everyone for the help! I'll update with my "final" map... more logs.. and tracktimes soon enough
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 07:38 PM
  #54  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
That zeitronix screenshot doesn't really tell us much.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 08:21 PM
  #55  
justchil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
It gives you a general idea... when it's complete I might post up some logs
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #56  
Noogles's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal (LA County)
I looked at the log anf timming is just about perfect (assuming the log is accurate)

you won't have to worry about it pulling any timing.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 09:26 PM
  #57  
justchil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Did you notice that my peak air flow hz was exactly 1603.95 serveral times? Same in other logs. I'll get a better evoscan log soon.. It kept crapping out on me as I was driving around today but i think I've got it fixed.

Car pulls smooth and hard.. way better than before. I'm going to try to dyno again @ BR July 7th. Hopefully I can get two hours of time so I can swap gas/maps and get some good data on my car

One thing on the timing. Do you think tapering the idle advance might help idle out some?
My "base" flash increases with load.

the example:
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 01:31 AM
  #58  
jcsbanks's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 6
From: UK
Mine is also clipping at 1603.95 Hz.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 01:43 AM
  #59  
Noogles's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal (LA County)
Originally Posted by justchil
Did you notice that my peak air flow hz was exactly 1603.95 serveral times? Same in other logs. I'll get a better evoscan log soon.. It kept crapping out on me as I was driving around today but i think I've got it fixed.

Car pulls smooth and hard.. way better than before. I'm going to try to dyno again @ BR July 7th. Hopefully I can get two hours of time so I can swap gas/maps and get some good data on my car

One thing on the timing. Do you think tapering the idle advance might help idle out some?
My "base" flash increases with load.

the example:
it might help, timing advance at idle promotes a stronger burn, but if you have to much it could hurt your idle. i sent you what worked for me with 280's adjust it till you get it how you want. shoot for about 14-18 in/mg at idle.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 05:45 AM
  #60  
justchil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Roger that.

One thing I've thought off.. I currently don't have the honeycomb in my MAF. Mine was destroyed and the one I bought.. well the guy didnt bother to tell me it was missing.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:12 PM.