Notices
ECU Flash

EvoScan v0.99 - Zoomable Graphs / RealTime Alarms / Power & Torque Graphing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 04:34 PM
  #106  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
You do have the white connector unplugged, right?

Where is your LC1 grounded, perhaps offsets are effecting the ECU since the laptop is using ECU ground (ultimately engine). Are you grounded to block?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 06:11 PM
  #107  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Originally Posted by evo4mad
This annoys me too, I am currently analysing the FTDI chip reset to supress the surplus signals it sends to the reflash connector



I have converted my evo4 to an evo8 ecu, so I will now be programming this into evoscan.

I wonder what your code does differently than mine, I haven't had any reports of this happening with Mitsulogger.

I don't toggle the RTS/CTS or DTR signals when I initialize the port.. One of those would definitely set the init pin high.. I also don't poll the port as a com port which could force it to reset. HOWEVER OBD-Scantech does do that, and doesn't trigger the init pin.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #108  
zbomb's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 1
From: Mass
Originally Posted by nothere
hmm, I can't get .99 to run right at all now. it worked fine for a day or two, now it seems to be affecting the ecu, as rpm will rise for no reason at a stop light, and idle drops when I hit the log button. none of the logged items move , but they all indicate maximum values.

I'm going to reinstall the program and start from scratch.
I had the same problem with .98, Even with the white connector unplugged. .99 works fine though.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #109  
nothere's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue. WA
I have ecu+, logworks and mitsulogger all working. With or without the white plug.
The lc-1 works in ecu+ and logworks.

maybe its a driver thing with the logworks.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #110  
PA-silver03evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Hanover, Pa
Originally Posted by Rob W.
That can't be right. I haven't even used .99 in my car yet, but I was able to load up a .97 log and have it graph torque and HP in .99.
For some reason the first log I did wont show hp and tq on the graph. I can open the second one and it reads fine and then without changing anything try to open the first and it doesnt show power. The only difference was I opened the graph and clicked on calc. power and tq before logging.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #111  
evo4mad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: TGA, New Zealand
I tested it a lot more with EvoScan, and it seems fine,

Disconnect the reflash connector when not using it, because no matter what program, if you plug/unplug the usb cable from the pc while driving it will reset the car ecu, obviously the ftdi driver sending an unknown signal to the vehicle via the reflash connector.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 04:35 AM
  #112  
ghoonk's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, UAE
Hamish, I have not been able to get the LM-1 working. When logging all the fields under AFR come up empty. It works fine with Mitsulogger, but I just have not been able to get it working with EvoScan.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #113  
cij911's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 1
From: Socal :)
Hamish -- I am running a Zeitronix Wideband w/ Boost sensor. I am able to log AFRs using v.99, but the MAP readings make no sense to me (don't appear to be correct). I should be seeing peak boost of ~24.5 psi at 3500, but am seeing 47.79 (MAP).

What does MAP really represent and what are the units of measure? Where can I see my boost / vacuum? Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 07:41 AM
  #114  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by cij911
Hamish -- I am running a Zeitronix Wideband w/ Boost sensor. I am able to log AFRs using v.99, but the MAP readings make no sense to me (don't appear to be correct). I should be seeing peak boost of ~24.5 psi at 3500, but am seeing 47.79 (MAP).

What does MAP really represent and what are the units of measure? Where can I see my boost / vacuum? Thanks
Sounds like the number is doubled.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 07:43 AM
  #115  
cij911's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 1
From: Socal :)
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Sounds like the number is doubled.
I think something is wrong with the code, because MAP goes to 47.79 the second I go 100% TPS. Clearly it is not boost ....
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 07:51 AM
  #116  
chmodlf's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: CT
The fuel trims are mislabeled.

Fuel Trim High should be Fuel Trim Low - Request ID should be 0E currently is 0C

Fuel Trim Low should be Fuel Trim High - Request ID should be 0C currently is 0E

The reason that I noticed this is my fuel trim high never varied from 100. With the new version of EvoScan it was off.

I verified this in Mitsulogger.

The XML defs need to be corrected.

Last edited by chmodlf; Apr 9, 2007 at 07:56 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 08:06 AM
  #117  
honda-guy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 37
From: Central PA
i tested evoscan .99 over the weekend and everything seems to work fine for me.

does anyone have any real good guage layout they want to share.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 08:18 AM
  #118  
chmodlf's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by honda-guy
i tested evoscan .99 over the weekend and everything seems to work fine for me.
ARe you sure that you looked at the request IDs for the high and low fuel trim?

I have a hard time believing that only my install corrupted those xml defs...

But then again I have seen some crazy shizit.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #119  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Originally Posted by evo4mad

Disconnect the reflash connector when not using it, because no matter what program, if you plug/unplug the usb cable from the pc while driving it will reset the car ecu, obviously the ftdi driver sending an unknown signal to the vehicle via the reflash connector.
Good to know.

This should be included as one of the many other facts pertaining to the "protocol of open port logging" which needs to be listed somewhere.

Hell, I just started my own list
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 06:12 PM
  #120  
honda-guy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 37
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by chmodlf
ARe you sure that you looked at the request IDs for the high and low fuel trim?

I have a hard time believing that only my install corrupted those xml defs...

But then again I have seen some crazy shizit.
you are correct, my low and high fuel trim is also backward.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:37 PM.