TephraMOD V5.8 - testing help required
smog,
was your lean spool turned off on your last rom?
If it was and you moved to this new rom without access to the lean spool yet, it's turn back on which will cause the car to run leaner with the same fuel map.
Are you watching AFR as well?
was your lean spool turned off on your last rom?
If it was and you moved to this new rom without access to the lean spool yet, it's turn back on which will cause the car to run leaner with the same fuel map.
Are you watching AFR as well?
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
smog - to log 2byte load in 5.8 just log 0xFFFF840B... U only need to log 1 byte
then put something like this in your EvoScan xml:
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Load 1Byte" LogReference="Load1B" RequestID="41" Eval="1.2*x" Unit="load" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="270" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="270" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Obviously change your RequestID, and since you are hitting 380 loads you will need to use Eval="1.5*x".
Also update you ecuflash 2byte-1byte factor (in tephra mods) to 1.5 to match your xml...
then put something like this in your EvoScan xml:
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Load 1Byte" LogReference="Load1B" RequestID="41" Eval="1.2*x" Unit="load" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="270" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="270" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Obviously change your RequestID, and since you are hitting 380 loads you will need to use Eval="1.5*x".
Also update you ecuflash 2byte-1byte factor (in tephra mods) to 1.5 to match your xml...
I can, but didn't on that log.
I'll have to add them back in then
. I just deleted #2,3,and4 on boost and wastegate for now in my xml. Wierd thing is that in the stock xml, it didn't say "Base," it said "Max" on the wastegate duty. Since they were the only wastegate table that had 1 - 4, I figured it was the right table...
I'll have to add them back in then
. I just deleted #2,3,and4 on boost and wastegate for now in my xml. Wierd thing is that in the stock xml, it didn't say "Base," it said "Max" on the wastegate duty. Since they were the only wastegate table that had 1 - 4, I figured it was the right table...well i did not know how to delete them. so i just renamed them and added a ''do not mod'' and in the event i ever need it or it becomes usable its all still there and not deleted or disabled..... just left alone which is fine. up to you bud. miles well leave it as you have it. hahah.
Code:
<table name="Boost Desired Engine Load # 1" address="3f80">
<table name="RPM" address="722e" elements="16"/>
</table>
<!--<table name="Boost Desired Engine Load # 2" address="3f96">
<table name="RPM" address="722e" elements="16" scaling="RPM"/>
</table>
<table name="Boost Desired Engine Load # 3" address="3fb2">
<table name="RPM" address="722e" elements="16"/>
</table>
-->
<table name="Max Wastegate Duty # 1" address="3f38">
<table name="RPM" address="722e" elements="16"/>
</table>
<!--<table name="Max Wastegate Duty # 2" address="3f4e">
<table name="RPM" address="722e" elements="16"/>
</table>
<table name="Max Wastegate Duty # 3" address="3f6a">
<table name="RPM" address="722e" elements="16"/>
</table>
-->
To get lean spool enable/diable and to remove my EGR trouble codes and in 5.8, can I add the following tables? I copied straight out of my old 94170008 rom.
<table name="ECU Periphery0" category="Misc" address="faa" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>
<table name="ECU Periphery2" category="Misc" address="fca" type="1D" level="1" scaling="Hex16"/>
<table name="Lean Spool Enable " address="1681" type="1D" level="1" scaling="uint8"/>
<table name="Lean Spool Disable" address="1685" type="1D" level="1" scaling="uint8"/>
56DA is the value for table Periphery0
0DDF is the value for table Periphery2
48 is the value for the lean spool enable
48 is the value for the lean spool disable
Worth a try? I just worry that the 0008 and the 0015 roms are too different...
Last edited by Smogrunner; Jul 20, 2008 at 07:21 PM.
Smog,
The lean Spool addresses are correct for 94170014/15
value of 48 = 1500rpm
Periphery0 address is correct and stock value is 56DA
Periphery2 address is correct and stock value is EFDF, you having 0DDF in there disables the EGR checks, which is ok if that is what you intended.
The lean Spool addresses are correct for 94170014/15
value of 48 = 1500rpm
Periphery0 address is correct and stock value is 56DA
Periphery2 address is correct and stock value is EFDF, you having 0DDF in there disables the EGR checks, which is ok if that is what you intended.
Smog,
The lean Spool addresses are correct for 94170014/15
value of 48 = 1500rpm
Periphery0 address is correct and stock value is 56DA
Periphery2 address is correct and stock value is EFDF, you having 0DDF in there disables the EGR checks, which is ok if that is what you intended.
The lean Spool addresses are correct for 94170014/15
value of 48 = 1500rpm
Periphery0 address is correct and stock value is 56DA
Periphery2 address is correct and stock value is EFDF, you having 0DDF in there disables the EGR checks, which is ok if that is what you intended.
Ok, since my last post, I successfully:
*added lean spool enable/disable
*added the egr cel fix for my AMS VSR intake mani.
*updated my ecuflash 2byte-1byte factor to 1.5 in my tephra mods section
However, I need more help with this (see highlights in black):
*added lean spool enable/disable
*added the egr cel fix for my AMS VSR intake mani.
*updated my ecuflash 2byte-1byte factor to 1.5 in my tephra mods section
However, I need more help with this (see highlights in black):
Originally Posted by tephra
smog - to log 2byte load in 5.8 just log 0xFFFF840B... U only need to log 1 byte (where do I find/add this value?)
then put something like this in your EvoScan xml: (when I open EvoScan there is no xml that is named 94170015. Should I cut and paste one in and then add this below?
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Load 1Byte" LogReference="Load1B" RequestID="41" Eval="1.2*x" Unit="load" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="270" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="270" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Obviously change your RequestID, and since you are hitting 380 loads you will need to use Eval="1.5*x".
(not obvious I'm still too much a rookie)
then put something like this in your EvoScan xml: (when I open EvoScan there is no xml that is named 94170015. Should I cut and paste one in and then add this below?
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Load 1Byte" LogReference="Load1B" RequestID="41" Eval="1.2*x" Unit="load" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="270" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="270" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Obviously change your RequestID, and since you are hitting 380 loads you will need to use Eval="1.5*x".
(not obvious I'm still too much a rookie)
Last edited by Smogrunner; Jul 20, 2008 at 09:13 PM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
no evoscan xml is different to ecuflash xml
look in evoscan directory\DataSettings\data.xml
add my fragment near the existing "Load MUT 2Byte Mod" entry (about 60 lines down??)
look in evoscan directory\DataSettings\data.xml
add my fragment near the existing "Load MUT 2Byte Mod" entry (about 60 lines down??)
What does tephra mean "change my request id?" He's referring to the second column on EvoScan where it is currently at 41. Is 41 wrong?
btw, I remembered to change the 1.2 to 1.5 in that data string.
btw, I remembered to change the 1.2 to 1.5 in that data string.
Last edited by Smogrunner; Jul 20, 2008 at 09:53 PM.
To do the two byte airflow, I'll need to add that the two byte xml. I'll try to do it before I nod off tonight and I log on my way to work in the morning. Any idea on what the right reference id on the 1 byte mod above is? It says 41 now, but tephra said above that it "obviously" needs to be changed....
Here is what I'm set to log. If anyone interested sees bad request IDs or other function/formula problems, or something that they'd like to see logged, I'll try to accommodate:
