Notices
ECU Flash

TephraMod V7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 07:01 PM
  #2191  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
I cant change the value in Hz column. Any change results in a "0", need to scale it beyond 1610 hz
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 06:46 AM
  #2192  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
I cant change the value in Hz column. Any change results in a "0", need to scale it beyond 1610 hz

^help^



Also, I found just a few type errors, I can make a list if needed for future v's. Here's one: "Vehicle speed must be UNDER (OVER) this value to allow NLTS to be activated:"
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2011 | 04:49 AM
  #2193  
bleunetizen's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: NZ
Wow very long thread.. is 8857008 out yet?
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2011 | 05:37 AM
  #2194  
todd6027's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 13
From: Ireland
Originally Posted by ecktt
anyone testing the 90550001 v7?
Hows progress going?
X2 Any news
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2011 | 08:09 PM
  #2195  
PeteyTurbo@KHC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Philly, Jersey
Has anyone had sucess with 94170715 in regards to psi based boost control function, specifically error correction? I decided to give it a shot after using 96530706 and the eroor correction pulls duty cycle even when I request 40psi PLUS atmospheric pressure either in the adder or not, it makes no difference..Also it seems there some other variances between this rom and 965 that will cause starting difficulties for some, specifically in the priming and cranking enrichment values. Anyone have any ideas or am I just retarded again? All of the associated scalings show omni4bar so I am not sure what to think with this one unless boost adder psi is actually kpa or something.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 04:05 AM
  #2196  
Icem@n's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: St. George's, Grenada
Originally Posted by ecktt
anyone testing the 90550001 v7?
Hows progress going?

Originally Posted by todd6027
X2 Any news

Anything yet?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:00 AM
  #2197  
PeteyTurbo@KHC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Philly, Jersey
I also noticed the target boost tables go above 24.6 in the 94170715 rom.. Has anyone been able to sucessfully run ecu boost with this rom?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 08:03 AM
  #2198  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
You can change the scaling and nop out the SHLR in the code to get more boost

I can't remember exactly because its been a while - but maybe post in the mrfred direct boost thread
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 06:10 PM
  #2199  
W2J's Avatar
W2J
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Trinidad
Originally Posted by Icem@n
Originally Posted by ecktt
anyone testing the 90550001 v7?
Hows progress going?




Anything yet?
bumppppppp!!!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 05:00 AM
  #2200  
audiofan's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 254
Likes: 8
From: Vzla
id 97470001, anybody has this patched??

or wich one could I use (evo 8 EDM)
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 12:02 PM
  #2201  
raasfaas's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
From: Fl/Jam
Originally Posted by raasfaas
Okay maybe I'm overlooking something, but I'm having a bit of trouble logging lb/min in evoscan. When I originally downloaded V7 I was able to log it with no problem.
That was a while back, now I tried today and got some weird readings (its stuck at 204.4692) So I figured maybe I changed around one of the MUT addresses so I copied the entire MUT table from the factory V7 rom, and removed and reinstalled a fresh copy of evoscan 2.6 and copied in the data to the XML (so basically it's like I downloaded everything from scratch)
I honestly can't remember but was there anything else that had to be done to be able to log lb/min?
bumping this for some feedback...anyone else having problems logging lb/min?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 12:29 PM
  #2202  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by PeteyTurbo@KHC
I also noticed the target boost tables go above 24.6 in the 94170715 rom.. Has anyone been able to sucessfully run ecu boost with this rom?
Yes, I have successfully ran ECU boost with full error correction on the 9417 V7 ROM.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 05:48 PM
  #2203  
3gEclipseTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: ma
Big shout out to tephra, just passed emissions with no cat, no o2 sensors(full time open loop), no egr, and everything else emission related. Thanks
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 07:04 PM
  #2204  
Ralph's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: N/A
Originally Posted by PeteyTurbo@KHC
Values they are set to..This is what I have for tps axis:
0
70.5882
10139.2
25660.8
0
70.5882
10139.2
25660.8
0

Also this car is not reacting well to this rom but I am going to clean out my xml's and try a fresh one.
Flash car> car will not start(cranks)>flash back tune before applying 0-100 tps scaling>then flash tune that prevents car from starting>car fires right up>wait 10 min and start again=car will not start lol....I also believe I had the map sensor scaling set for jdm 3 bar for the target boost table but I doubt it would prevent the car from starting.. Probably something in the xml or wgdc TPS but I will post up what I find to be the problem.
Did you ever find out what was causing this problem? I have that same y-axis values messed up problem. My car also will not start after I flash the car, run it.. and turn it off for a minute. I'm using the OMNI 4Bar with omni settings in place.

Reply
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 07:12 PM
  #2205  
Raptord's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 20
From: Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
This is what your table def. should look like for max upward tps correction:

Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:43 AM.