Notices
ECU Flash

**Need Help setting up V7???** Here is your answer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 08:24 AM
  #271  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
From the "94170715 V7 Issues" discussion:

Originally Posted by chmodlf
For those who want to log 2 byte loads

2byte load raw = 895C and 895D

2byte load + baro compensated = 8960 and 8961

2byte load + baro and IAT compensated = 8962 and 8963

The load for afr is raw and timing is baro-iat compensated

Is this what you're looking for?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 08:26 AM
  #272  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
Originally Posted by Ted B
From the "94170715 V7 Issues" discussion:




Is this what you're looking for?
Yeah.....Don't know how I missed that. UGH.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 08:54 AM
  #273  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Evolved Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Liked
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 47
From: On a cliff
Cool so what I'm going to do is revert back and just move everything from the 94170015 right to the V7 94170715 and ditch the V7 9653 all together.

This way I can be sure my everything is close to how it was non V7
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 08:57 AM
  #274  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Evolved Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Liked
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 47
From: On a cliff
Originally Posted by Appauldd
9653 and 9417 have different settings for the Periphery bits. If you make the switch to 9417....use it's bits as a starting point.

As for the MUT, it should be correct. If anyone finds a discrepancy please let me know and I will make the changes ASAP.

I would like to be able to log "load+baro+temp". If one of the Disassembly gurus would be so kind as to look it up in 94170015 and post the address. I will make the XML for it.
The MUT from 94170015 closley matches the V7 94170715. These compared to the 9653 are completely different
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 09:56 AM
  #275  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
The 94170015 MUT uses the same address to make the 94170715.

I think there needs to be some standardization for the MUT so that we can have EvoScan standard addresses.

I know it used to be that

00, 01 = 2 byte load
02, 03 = 2 byte rpm
04, 05 = 2 byte airflow

But, this is where is 9653 is putting...

2-byte LOAD_Raw (no temp compensation)
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x09
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0A

2-byte LOAD_Temp_Compensated
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0B
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0C

2-byte LOAD_Baro_Compensated
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0D
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0E

2-byte LOAD_Temp_and_Baro_Compensated
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0F
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x10
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 10:23 AM
  #276  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Evolved Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Liked
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 47
From: On a cliff
Originally Posted by Appauldd
The 94170015 MUT uses the same address to make the 94170715.

I think there needs to be some standardization for the MUT so that we can have EvoScan standard addresses.

I know it used to be that

00, 01 = 2 byte load
02, 03 = 2 byte rpm
04, 05 = 2 byte airflow

But, this is where is 9653 is putting...

2-byte LOAD_Raw (no temp compensation)
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x09
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0A

2-byte LOAD_Temp_Compensated
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0B
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0C

2-byte LOAD_Baro_Compensated
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0D
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0E

2-byte LOAD_Temp_and_Baro_Compensated
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x0F
hex value at 1C in MUT table + 0x10
Have 2-Byte Air, load, and RPM logging in my 94170015 so should I just transfer that MUT table over to the one in 94170715
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #277  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
The 2byte load, rpm and airflow are already put in properly in my version of 95170715....you should be ok.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 10:33 AM
  #278  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
FWIW, the MUT table in Tephra's base V7 bin file were not configured for the 2-byte load, airflow, and RPM. After loading your XML, I still had to plug in those values (as per "Official 2-byte Thread") to get everything working.

Last edited by Ted B; Aug 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 10:58 AM
  #279  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Evolved Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Liked
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 47
From: On a cliff
Originally Posted by Appauldd
The 2byte load, rpm and airflow are already put in properly in my version of 95170715....you should be ok.
Cool I'll give it a shot. I do notice a couple values in your V7 MUT differ from the 94170015 rom.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 11:07 AM
  #280  
mountainturbo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: WVC, UT
Ok so n00b questions, I just finally switched to the Tephra rom after running my modded 96940011 for a long time. I just put on a bigger turbo, and I have a JDM 3 bar map. With the new rom, I'm a bit confused on the PSI boost control as the names all changed. Was there a thread that says what I need to put for my boost adder, etc? If I was to go for 25 PSI right now, what would I need to put into the boost adder table etc? Any help would be awesome!
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2010 | 02:03 AM
  #281  
VGergo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 566
Likes: 1
From: Hungary
Hello

In the Global fuel settings -Startup part the Initial Cranking IPW vs Coolant Temp table is the main the adder table at start up ? With bigger injectors I shoud lower the values 45 and upper fahrenheit degrees by the % as the injectors get bigger ?

In the Main map fuel setting the Cranking Primer Initial Pulse table shoud leave with pump gas and in the Alt map fuel settings for E85 shoud increase ?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2010 | 05:48 AM
  #282  
Dragracer187's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: The Dragstrip
Should I copy over MAF compensation from the old rom to V7? They have different values.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2010 | 06:41 PM
  #283  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Subscribed for later
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 10:37 AM
  #284  
mountainturbo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: WVC, UT
So after loading the V7 mod over my 05 rom, I started throwing the code for rear 02 sensor (I had it disabled in my old rom) I disabled it through the periphary bits, but now I'm getting the P0125 code because of it. Is there a workaround for this on the V7 rom?
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 10:56 AM
  #285  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
i noticed i have the 2000RPM cold start problem. i thought it was an adjustment to make. didn't realize it was a big issue that was hard to fix. dayng.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:03 PM.