Notices
ECU Flash

Trying to understand timing map

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #91  
jid2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 6
From: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
tscompusa -

What is your load and timing at peak torque? I use good ol fashion 2 byte load so it doesn't clip, but I'm old school and don't bother with the 2->1 byte conversion thing.

I run around 0 degrees to 4 degrees of timing at peak torque, and this is based on conversations with JohnBradley and GST, and lots of pulls and logging. 12 degrees out the top is safe for sure. You may be able to get up to 17 or so.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 04:03 PM
  #92  
ethan169's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut / Vermont
Originally Posted by Appauldd
^ good call.

Adjust the "Idle stability timing control" down to 80 from the stock 160....this will make the knock hit fast and decay fast....easier to pinpoint the exact knock cell location.
Im a little confused on what this will do? Could you explain it a little bit more?

Two side notes as well. I was getting gas this afternoon and I happened to check my oil level. It was a bit low for some reason. A little below the low level notch. I had about 1/4 a quart of mobil 1 kicking around so i put that in. it will most likley need another 3/4 quart of oil to get back to full. I never had a problem loosing oil before. And I dont see any spots under the car when i move it although its tough to tell when its so wet out. Could low oil level cause knock? I feel like it prob could...?

Another thing I just realized is that I still have a Turbo XS UTEC installed on the car from wayyyy back. I never actually used it and kept it on map 0 all the time which is supposed to be "bypass mode" Ill try to take it out this weekend just to be sure but could it be causing problems with knock and maybe even effecting my data logger?

-Ethan
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 08:27 PM
  #93  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
Originally Posted by ethan169
it will most likley need another 3/4 quart of oil to get back to full
A bit off topic, but I just wanted to add a little side note to this. The top mark isn't a full mark, it's a max mark. Ideally, you want to be between the two marks, especially if you don't burn oil. Too much oil is as bad, if not worse, than too little. You can aerate the oil, causing foaming and oil starvation.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 09:14 PM
  #94  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by jid2
tscompusa -

What is your load and timing at peak torque? I use good ol fashion 2 byte load so it doesn't clip, but I'm old school and don't bother with the 2->1 byte conversion thing.

I run around 0 degrees to 4 degrees of timing at peak torque, and this is based on conversations with JohnBradley and GST, and lots of pulls and logging. 12 degrees out the top is safe for sure. You may be able to get up to 17 or so.
the logs i have really aren't telling me much, on some pulls i see 300 load at 3200rpm, and others around 3900rpm is where it maxed and was clipped at 306.

according to the log the max load was seeing 6* with 2 counts of knock. ill knock it down some around 4 as you suggested. another member on here sent me a map to use to test, but i thought it looked to aggressive ill post it.

cars down atm, since im fixing phantom knock issues but will be taking it back out and doing some base pulls but i want safe maps for base pulls and i really need to know which LOAD is the best to log and go by since that is very important tuning the map

heres 2 the one with the smoothed negatives is the one i was given to try and the other one i was messing with based on another e85 map i seen here.






im going to do the initial tune with the 9417 rom since i already know how the car acts with that rom. let me know what you think.


isnt the 120-140 load columns a bit much also?

-- edit ---

i was viewing your build thread, very impressive car you got. i seen your e85 timing map and im just going to copy it since we got a similar setup and its mild. the ones i posted are a bit aggressive for a starter map. my old maps were all 7's and 8's it doesnt get much more aggressive than that at pk tq, so your map should be 10x safer.

Last edited by tscompusa2; Feb 20, 2010 at 04:03 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 05:30 AM
  #95  
ethan169's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut / Vermont
Originally Posted by Appauldd
^ good call.

Adjust the "Idle stability timing control" down to 80 from the stock 160....this will make the knock hit fast and decay fast....easier to pinpoint the exact knock cell location.
Paul.

I cant find this section in EcuFlash...

I have seen on a recent cruise log what i believe to be "phantom knock" Can you confirm this? I have posted the log look around line 650 I have highlighted it in red so you CANT miss it.

And what the purpose of this "Idle Stability timing control"

Thanks

-Ethan
Attached Files
File Type: zip
Phantom knock.zip (42.2 KB, 0 views)

Last edited by ethan169; Feb 23, 2010 at 05:45 AM. Reason: attached log
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 05:39 AM
  #96  
hediki12's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 522
Likes: 2
From: mnt vernon ny
Originally Posted by ethan169
Paul.

I cant find this section in EcuFlash...

I have seen on a recent cruise log what i believe to be "phantom knock" Can you confirm this? I have posted the log look around line 650 I have highlighted it in red so you CANT miss it.

And what the purpose of this "Idle Stability timing control"

Thanks

-Ethan
that looks like a typo. appauld told me to do the same and it was called the knock sum decay timer .
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 05:43 AM
  #97  
ethan169's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut / Vermont
Originally Posted by hediki12
that looks like a typo. appauld told me to do the same and it was called the knock sum decay timer .
I dont have that either though??
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 05:51 AM
  #98  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
its under Knock control. id imagine its "knock load"
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 06:02 AM
  #99  
ethan169's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut / Vermont
Originally Posted by tscompusa
its under Knock control. id imagine its "knock load"
Ok so under my unmodified EcuFlash XMLI dont have the knock control section. But when I open my ROM in my modified version of EcuFlash with the XML file the tscompusa sent me for the tephra mod I do have this section. Is that something you have to add to the "stock" XML file in ecu flash to see?

-ethan
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 06:57 AM
  #100  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
yes, but why are you still bothering with the non tephra xml?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 07:03 AM
  #101  
ethan169's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut / Vermont
Because I couldn't get it to start. with the tephra rom. I was going through the original v5.10 release. Since the car didnt start with that rom im trying to find the information on here of how to setup the v5.10 mod.... Your xml had quite a few extra tables defined then the originally released v5.10 xml file?

There has to be some direction written down somewhere on how to setup the Tephra V5.10
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 07:08 AM
  #102  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
ill take another look at your rom. it probably didnt start because the immob hex is for a 2004 evo and 2003 is different. if you search the forum you'll find stuff everywhere.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 07:09 AM
  #103  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
Originally Posted by ethan169
Because I couldn't get it to start. with the tephra rom. I was going through the original v5.10 release. Since the car didnt start with that rom im trying to find the information on here of how to setup the v5.10 mod.... Your xml had quite a few extra tables defined then the originally released v5.10 xml file?

There has to be some direction written down somewhere on how to setup the Tephra V5.10
Shoot me a PM with your email.....I will get you going in the right direction with 5.10.....Too Easy.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 07:12 AM
  #104  
ethan169's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut / Vermont
ive been searching on and off for a few days now. But im no t giving up yet!

Also if paul happens to come back to this thread I saw something he posted on another thread about "Idle Stability timing control" and posted this table

<table name="Idle Stability Timing Control" category="Timing" address="174e" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint16">
<table name="Settings" type="Static X Axis" elements="3">
<data>Sensitivity</data>
<data>Timing Limit</data>
<data>Untested</data>
</table>
</table>

You were saying something about raising the sensitivity from the stock 128 to 146... My idle is a bit more unstable now compared to how it was with more timing at idle. Maybe I should change that back as well. It was at 14* idle and not its 10 to 8* at idle.....

-ethan
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2010 | 07:12 AM
  #105  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
i already gave him the rom already done. ethan send him the rom / xml i sent you or ill forward it if you give me your email appauldd. its funny how my car fires right up with the rom tho.. and of course i set his immobilizer hex to match his original rom.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 PM.