Notices
ECU Flash

Virtual Dyno - Standalone Software

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 05:25 PM
  #751  
BoostedFury's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl
I made them full read/write access and it still gave me the error.

I tried running the VD in admin mode and it worked now.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2011 | 05:46 PM
  #752  
03RRVIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Northwest
hi,

I installed the new version, and started to have some issue opening it. But Thanks to tscompusa for helping me fix that issue..

And now i get this error message everytime i click on anything. What could this be????




Thanks!
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 12:15 AM
  #753  
germanracing's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally Posted by bbarnhill
Boosted_Tuning is correct ... it is WHP
Ah, that makes sense!

Out of interest: Is there a common factor you can multiply it with to get crank hp for the X MR? (example: say 300whp x 1.25 = 375crank)
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 05:34 AM
  #754  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
I have no idea due to every car being a bit different. I couldnt find that information on all the vehicles hence the reason the option doesnt exist. I figure its not that hard to convert by hand for the small few that need crank HP (which in my opinion doesnt matter since it doesnt count till it hits the wheel).

Im betting someone on here knows the drivetrain loss factor ... who will chime in first is the only question. Got to love this forum.

Originally Posted by germanracing
Ah, that makes sense!

Out of interest: Is there a common factor you can multiply it with to get crank hp for the X MR? (example: say 300whp x 1.25 = 375crank)
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 05:35 AM
  #755  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
Originally Posted by BoostedFury
I made them full read/write access and it still gave me the error.

I tried running the VD in admin mode and it worked now.
Ohh yeah and that. I am really hoping that 1.0.8 fixes that problem but we shall see. It installs and works on all my machines and a few tuners machines so ... no errors like that yet.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 05:37 AM
  #756  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
Originally Posted by 03RRVIII
hi,

I installed the new version, and started to have some issue opening it. But Thanks to tscompusa for helping me fix that issue..

And now i get this error message everytime i click on anything. What could this be????

Thanks!
That is more than likely a string of data in your file is not able to be converted to a number at some point. Send me your log and Ill find it and let you know. Its easy for me to find it if I run it through the debugger, as it tells me exactly what string broke it.

bradbarnhill at hotmail com
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 07:31 AM
  #757  
Raptord's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 20
From: Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Originally Posted by germanracing
Ah, that makes sense!

Out of interest: Is there a common factor you can multiply it with to get crank hp for the X MR? (example: say 300whp x 1.25 = 375crank)
Drivetrain loss is somewhere between 21 and 24% if I remember correctly, so dividing by .78 should get you an idea of numbers at the crank.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 08:55 AM
  #758  
germanracing's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Smile

Originally Posted by Raptord
Drivetrain loss is somewhere between 21 and 24% if I remember correctly, so dividing by .78 should get you an idea of numbers at the crank.
Cheers for that!

Wow, that would make it 392 crank hp, not to shabby...

But from what I've heard a dynojet is braked less than one of our german dynos and gives higher numbers... So maybe that's only about 370hp or less, but still very respectable for a X MR...

In closing, I'd like to add: VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 09:04 AM
  #759  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
we could devote an entire thread to drivetrain loss theory. I've not seen any facts posted where someone tested on an engine dyno then on a chassis (awd) dyno for direct comparison in the states. That data may be readily available overseas where I don't so much surfing though.

I have to wonder if a fixed percentage would work though, higher rpm and higher power = more heat, more heat = more loss??
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 11:06 AM
  #760  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by germanracing
Ah, that makes sense!

Out of interest: Is there a common factor you can multiply it with to get crank hp for the X MR? (example: say 300whp x 1.25 = 375crank)
Please dont worry about crank/flywheel numbers. They dont matter.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 11:29 AM
  #761  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
I have to agree with both mellon_tuning and boosted_tuning. One its different per car and it is inaccurate to use a fixed number for conversion. Now will it vary that much that a set number cant get you close ... no. BUT ... its also a little useless since it only matters how much you can get to the ground not what your engine puts out. This program will show WHP and if you need to calculate crank hp for whatever reason, you can find the multipliers online somewhere. Hope these two great contributors helped out. I trust both of these guys as they have helped me out tremendously.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 01:57 PM
  #762  
germanracing's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally Posted by bbarnhill
I have to agree with both mellon_tuning and boosted_tuning. One its different per car and it is inaccurate to use a fixed number for conversion. Now will it vary that much that a set number cant get you close ... no. BUT ... its also a little useless since it only matters how much you can get to the ground not what your engine puts out. This program will show WHP and if you need to calculate crank hp for whatever reason, you can find the multipliers online somewhere. Hope these two great contributors helped out. I trust both of these guys as they have helped me out tremendously.
I agree that WHP is a far more useful number to know, unfortunately over here in germany most/close to all power numbers are measured in crank-hp... Don't ask me why, that's the way it's always been... (A dyno will measure the power while accelerating and then measure the drive train loss while decelerating)

So everybody is used to it and for "us" it's easier to compare that way...

It's a bit like if your speedo suddenly read in KPH instead of MPH...

Then again, I can go 260kph/160mph ANY time I choose to (without going to prison ), so it's swings and roundabouts... ;-)
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 02:29 PM
  #763  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
FWIW the stock evo 8's were rated at what 276bhp? the typically but down about 240awhp. that's about 13% DTL, nowhere near the 21-24% some AWD guys guess. On rwd cars the old rule of thumb was 15% but I'm not sure if that still holds true with modern drivetrains which may less resistant.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 03:24 PM
  #764  
germanracing's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning
FWIW the stock evo 8's were rated at what 276bhp? the typically but down about 240awhp. that's about 13% DTL, nowhere near the 21-24% some AWD guys guess. On rwd cars the old rule of thumb was 15% but I'm not sure if that still holds true with modern drivetrains which may less resistant.
Maybe, but don't most stock evos stray upward in terms of power?
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 05:59 PM
  #765  
pug206's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: España
Can someone make a graph of my car?

I can not use Virtual Dyno

Is Evo IX in 4ª gear wheels with 17 " driver 100kg (220.5 lb)


Thanks!

The file
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=L1RLMZD0
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:14 AM.