Notices
ECU Flash

Virtual Dyno - Standalone Software

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 06:33 AM
  #901  
wizzo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 14
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally Posted by bbarnhill
Hey thats better than Wizzos junk ... just kidding.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 08:23 AM
  #902  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
Would a swift kick to the junk cheer you up?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 08:50 AM
  #903  
wizzo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 14
From: Chicago suburbs
Woa! Hopefully I didn't do something wrong to **** u off. I'm just joking with u also.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 09:04 AM
  #904  
itzwolf's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Graphed my car this morning and was pleasantly surprised. Now that I finally fixed my cutout issues I can get back to tuning again but this is the first full clean pull post troubleshooting and correction. This is how the car has sat for a while but various issues stopped me from going any further so I am excited to push it a bit more.

Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 03:59 PM
  #905  
wizzo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 14
From: Chicago suburbs
Here is my current graph. I turned the boost down and backed the timing off just to be safe. End of May early June I should have some new numbers up with the new motor. Shooting for 600whp and 500tq. Will see what happens.
Attached Thumbnails Virtual Dyno - Standalone Software-vddynograph.jpg  

Last edited by wizzo 8; Apr 2, 2011 at 06:06 AM. Reason: Big graph
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 10:03 PM
  #906  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
Wizzo ... son you didnt **** me off. I was kidding. I have a very dry sense of humor.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 10:39 PM
  #907  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by itzwolf
Graphed my car this morning and was pleasantly surprised. Now that I finally fixed my cutout issues I can get back to tuning again but this is the first full clean pull post troubleshooting and correction. This is how the car has sat for a while but various issues stopped me from going any further so I am excited to push it a bit more.

not accurate. trim the rpm to 7500 then it should be ball park.. torque doesn't go up and down like that. especially at redline.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 02:38 AM
  #908  
gialla's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: france
Originally Posted by wizzo 8
Here is my current graph. I turned the boost down and backed the timing off just to be safe. End of May early June I should have some new numbers up with the new motor. Shooting for 600whp and 500tq. Will see what happens. Sorry for the thumbnail. I dont know how to load a big picture.
Very nice! now I need a black
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 06:41 AM
  #909  
itzwolf's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Originally Posted by tscompusa
not accurate. trim the rpm to 7500 then it should be ball park.. torque doesn't go up and down like that. especially at redline.
My car spins up to 9500, the AEM log was trimmed accordingly already before importing to Virtual Dyno, changing smoothing the numbers dont really change, its the first clean pull since fixing other issues, timing changes as boost fell and its more agressive at lower boost levels, its ramped strong in the high rpm areas, and my car is a little sensitive for AFR changes with e85 from initial tuning references and as noted in this graph as it richened power fell off (and boost slightly increased) and as it stablized the power start climbing/holding again.

I'll be sure to fine tune it and eventually post another graph when I get a chance to work on my car some more. It literally stays parked in my garage nearly all the time.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 02:06 PM
  #910  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by tscompusa
not accurate. trim the rpm to 7500 then it should be ball park.. torque doesn't go up and down like that. especially at redline.
Originally Posted by itzwolf
My car spins up to 9500, the AEM log was trimmed accordingly already before importing to Virtual Dyno, changing smoothing the numbers dont really change, its the first clean pull since fixing other issues, timing changes as boost fell and its more agressive at lower boost levels, its ramped strong in the high rpm areas, and my car is a little sensitive for AFR changes with e85 from initial tuning references and as noted in this graph as it richened power fell off (and boost slightly increased) and as it stablized the power start climbing/holding again.

I'll be sure to fine tune it and eventually post another graph when I get a chance to work on my car some more. It literally stays parked in my garage nearly all the time.
When using AEM logs in VD, you can skew the results depending on the transfer rate you export the log to .csv.

I believe the best option to use is 20hz, but ill have to recheck.

Last edited by Boosted Tuning; Mar 25, 2011 at 02:09 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 03:49 PM
  #911  
wizzo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 14
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally Posted by bbarnhill
Wizzo ... son you didnt **** me off. I was kidding. I have a very dry sense of humor.
Ok good. I have no intention of making anyone angry.

Originally Posted by tscompusa
not accurate. trim the rpm to 7500 then it should be ball park.. torque doesn't go up and down like that. especially at redline.
This is why my power drops at the end of my run. About the 6800 rpm area. I think Brad is fixing this for the new version coming out.

Originally Posted by gialla
Very nice! now I need a black
Yes I love this turbo. Its works and sounds awesome!
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 04:00 PM
  #912  
bbarnhill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, KS
Im fixing what? Did I already fix it in the beta?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 04:07 PM
  #913  
wizzo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 14
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally Posted by mt057
Here is my most recent dynojet dynograph with the same mods except for a Spoolin Up COP for comparsion. I installed the COP after having troubles on the dyno that day. The operator did not record my first two runs and the third had horrible miss fires. You can see the miss fires in the massive dip at where my peak torque would have been. There is no power drop at 6600-6800 rpm.



Here is another dynograph. This one is with the stock intercooler (I have a 3.5" ETS now) and my old tune so I made less power, but the power drop still does not happen at 6600-6800rpm.

I thought you were going to fix this issue with the next release? Not sure about the beta
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 05:59 PM
  #914  
mt057's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 12
From: DFW
Brad fixed the issue. I thought that I already posted up pics of the dynographs while using 1.09...

I am loving the new versions. Thank you again Brad!

Last edited by mt057; Mar 25, 2011 at 06:02 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 06:52 PM
  #915  
wizzo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 14
From: Chicago suburbs
Ok well the latest version available to everyone is 1.08. Yes some people have "pre-production" versions which have this issue fixed but not everyone. Thats why I said Brad is in the process of fixing this with the new version that will be coming out. I dont know maybe I should start keeping my remarks to myself in this thread.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:49 PM.