Notices
ECU Flash

Need HUGE help!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 03:20 PM
  #91  
BEKevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 718
Likes: 2
From: Ventura, Ca
Originally Posted by nikos_paps
i think your low octane ignition map is better than high octane, but you need to change from load 10-40 and rpm from 500-1000 to 10!but set your idle to 950-975rpm
also i think your low octane map is better, but it needs somes changes, like idle afr to 14.2-14.7! no reason for 15.6!!!
i dont have much time to search all yours map!
if someone have other opinion i would like to hear it!!!
No need for so many exclamation marks..

His previous tuner, name withheld, may have attempted to tune the car in open loop in the cruise/idle area ( AFR & timing* map). Trying to give him a leaner cruise/ idle (ie most likely A target AFR of 15:1 to improve fuel consumption while operating in those portions of the map).. But, it doesn't seem like he did a good job considering all the stalling issues the OP is having.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 03:33 PM
  #92  
domyz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
From: Canada
Originally Posted by nikos_paps
i think your low octane ignition map is better than high octane, but you need to change from load 10-40 and rpm from 500-1000 to 10!but set your idle to 950-975rpm
also i think your low octane map is better, but it needs somes changes, like idle afr to 14.2-14.7! no reason for 15.6!!!
i dont have much time to search all yours map!
if someone have other opinion i would like to hear it!!!
The low octane ignition map is not good, not smooth, and it will raise EGT.
The 15,6 at idle you could leave it there. It has no effect as the car is running closed loop at this RPM/Load. Messing with that is pointless without changing open loop crossover points.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 04:23 PM
  #93  
BEKevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 718
Likes: 2
From: Ventura, Ca
Originally Posted by domyz
Messing with that is pointless without changing open loop crossover points.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 04:26 PM
  #94  
nikos_paps's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Originally Posted by domyz
The low octane ignition map is not good, not smooth, and it will raise EGT.
The 15,6 at idle you could leave it there. It has no effect as the car is running closed loop at this RPM/Load. Messing with that is pointless without changing open loop crossover points.
i didnt say to use low oct ignition!
low ocatne ignition has better values but someone must correct them!
ex. see ignition in 260load and 7500rpm in high octane
and the same at low octane!i think the values at the end of the map are better...
richer fuel - lower ignition is almost the same as leaner fuel - higher ignition for egt!
just play and see what is better!

Last edited by nikos_paps; Jan 22, 2013 at 04:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 04:59 PM
  #95  
domyz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 7
From: Canada
Originally Posted by nikos_paps
i didnt say to use low oct ignition!
low ocatne ignition has better values but someone must correct them!
ex. see ignition in 260load and 7500rpm in high octane
and the same at low octane!i think the values at the end of the map are better...
richer fuel - lower ignition is almost the same as leaner fuel - higher ignition for egt!
just play and see what is better!
you should take a beer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!
seriously stop putting these exclamations marks.

About his ROM, both maps are wrong. One is too agressive, the other not enough agressive. Both aren't smooth and both have erratical values.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 05:50 PM
  #96  
BEKevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 718
Likes: 2
From: Ventura, Ca
Originally Posted by domyz
you should take a beer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!
seriously stop putting these exclamations marks.

About his ROM, both maps are wrong. One is too agressive, the other not enough agressive. Both aren't smooth and both have erratical values.



We know you're trying to help Nikos, but you're just giving the OP incorrect information..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Careyalfie
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
6
Jan 11, 2017 06:42 PM
A872B
Cobb AccessPORT
12
Jul 29, 2016 11:54 AM
sxperia101
Lancer General
16
Apr 8, 2016 06:25 AM
Wmu240
Evo General
3
Dec 18, 2015 10:18 AM
letsgetthisdone
ECU Flash
10
Sep 18, 2015 01:26 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:50 AM.