Notices
ECU Flash

emission state inspection cal id

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2020 | 10:22 AM
  #151  
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 162
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by fireroasted
Thanks for the good notes. I tried that. I ran into the typical PC com issue. I have ECUFlash and EVOScan working as always, but the PCMSCAN could find the tactrix cable. I fiddled with it for a while, trying all the com ports etc, so I will have to troubleshoot again. is there anything you guys did to get that working which is expected to be different than the other apps?
I'm using a Tactrix OP 2.0 cable and selected the J2534 passthru interface in the PCMSCAN OBD-II settings screen.
Reply
Old May 21, 2020 | 10:25 AM
  #152  
Biggiesacks's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,690
Likes: 708
From: West Coast
I think I may have found the calid address for ecu P/N MN132874. Beginning at 0x538C -> 0x539B the Calid appears to repeat itself 8 times, which matches the number of ecu spec numbers. I wanna say in the US we run spec 0 (not sure) but I would imagine that would correspond to the first iteration at 0x538C. It will be at least a month or two before I can have a test rig set up to try this on a spare ECU, so if anyone else wants to take a crack at it by all means.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2020 | 04:28 PM
  #153  
unkn0wn.'s Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 86
Likes: 12
From: LA
Originally Posted by EV09AWD
2006 EVO IX USDM , 5Speed that has Unmodified ROM 88590015

Cal.Verf.Number: CVN1 : 78 6B 70 7B
CAL.ID: 1860A465CC

If people can post their car year: ROM # , CVN , CALID. for this information gathering would be nice. we can try to crack the codes and get another step ahead. This can be for any EVO 8, 9 ,X

If someone else wants to check their CVN for 88590015 is the same as across, or is this number different and vehicle specific?

Also I will be testing all 4 ROM's for USDM 2006 EVO IX to check if the CVN changes. and posting my results back here.
88590013: (will this be AA?)
88590014: (will this be BB?)
88590015: CALID: 1860A465CC ; CVN1 : 78 6B 70 7B
88590016: CALID: 1860A465DD ; CVN1 : 32 32 8F 49

*5-5-20: could it be that were seeing a pattern that the CALID is just the released successive letter\for the revision / Rom*
As in:
0013: Rev.AA
0014: Rev.BB
0015: Rev.CC
0016: Rev.DD


EVO 8's Below:
2005 USDM EVO 8
ROM: 96940011 CALID: 1860A118AA CVN: 2822E4BF (Note:
This is a stock ROM. It is not verified as passing the ref test - yet!)
...
..
.
.
.
.
.
I just put a couple things back to stock & flashed my stockish 88590016 ROM for smog tomorrow when I noticed your CALID is accurate for 88590016.
I've never seen VERIFICATION ID'S here so I thought I'd post a screenshot. I can also upload the Tehpra V7 equivalent when I remod and flash it back if anyone cares.


Just waiting to get off a full tank so I can do that final EVAP monitor.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2020 | 04:52 PM
  #154  
bboyalan's Avatar
Newbie
10 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 54
Likes: 6
From: Chula Vista SD, CA
Just to update this thread (and my posts from a few months ago): I surprisingly passed the other week heh. Tephra V7 SD as well and no red flag (just double-checked online again as I type this). Cal ID and Case ID were still "mismatched" lol, but I fine-tuned further for better live data, re-confirmed correct monitors, and set stock limiters for at least a better chance of not having a questionable/bogus CVN. In case I missed it or it was not already stated, any previously ref'd car will have its "certification type" as "referee" for testing. Hopefully this helps someone feel better about going into a test.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2020 | 09:19 PM
  #155  
fireroasted's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Likes: 7
From: CA
Just bumping this thread to see if there has been any more examples of folks getting a letter after having passed a smog check, only to later be asked to go to a referee because CVNs didn't match. I have been too chicken to get a smog test yet, so I am out of tags. Just trying to see if the community has caught up to what is thought to be a more thorough process in CA to identify if the ROMs have been written to.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2020 | 12:46 PM
  #156  
fireroasted's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Likes: 7
From: CA
Any new information on needing to manage the CVN or CALID if you are just going to a regular smog station. I believe above it would indicate the forums members experience is that only at a REF visit would you need to make sure those values are stock. Is that was is generally believed and experienced? There are several comments about getting a 'regular' smog inspection, passing, and getting a letter a few months later. Is that a thing?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2020 | 09:17 AM
  #157  
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Everyone is guessing at this point. I suggest not going to a regular smog station with a tune. This resulted with a friend passing smog and getting his registration, but after 1 month, Bar showed state ref for next renewal.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2020 | 09:21 AM
  #158  
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Originally Posted by fireroasted
Any new information on needing to manage the CVN or CALID if you are just going to a regular smog station. I believe above it would indicate the forums members experience is that only at a REF visit would you need to make sure those values are stock. Is that was is generally believed and experienced? There are several comments about getting a 'regular' smog inspection, passing, and getting a letter a few months later. Is that a thing?
I actually have this happen to 2 friends. I wasn't so lucky and had mine change to Ref after getting my renewal. It sucked because mine changed to ref a month before my registration was due.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2020 | 09:34 AM
  #159  
fireroasted's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Likes: 7
From: CA
Can we post the actual correct and current readiness values for 88590015

I am considering reflashing to stock before a regular smog check, based on what I am reading here. I checked with several Evo shops and tuners, and they are looking at me like I am from outerspace. I send them these links, but I wonder why more folks aren't aware and informed on this stuff and how it impacts our community.

As a homework item I wanted to review what should be marked as ready and make sure I don't do that thing where all of them are set ready, and some shouldn't be.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2020 | 10:42 AM
  #160  
Spooled_IX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 199
Likes: 64
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by fireroasted
Can we post the actual correct and current readiness values for 88590015

I am considering reflashing to stock before a regular smog check, based on what I am reading here. I checked with several Evo shops and tuners, and they are looking at me like I am from outerspace. I send them these links, but I wonder why more folks aren't aware and informed on this stuff and how it impacts our community.

As a homework item I wanted to review what should be marked as ready and make sure I don't do that thing where all of them are set ready, and some shouldn't be.
This was confirmed to pass

Originally Posted by EV09AWD
2006 EVO IX USDM , 5Speed that has Unmodified ROM 88590015

Cal.Verf.Number: CVN1 : 78 6B 70 7B
CAL.ID: 1860A465CC

If people can post their car year: ROM # , CVN , CALID. for this information gathering would be nice. we can try to crack the codes and get another step ahead. This can be for any EVO 8, 9 ,X

If someone else wants to check their CVN for 88590015 is the same as across, or is this number different and vehicle specific?

Also I will be testing all 4 ROM's for USDM 2006 EVO IX to check if the CVN changes. and posting my results back here.
88590013: (will this be AA?)
88590014: (will this be BB?)
88590015: CALID: 1860A465CC ; CVN1 : 78 6B 70 7B
88590016: CALID: 1860A465DD ; CVN1 : 32 32 8F 49
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2020 | 02:55 AM
  #161  
beatmania's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: SF CA
Has anyone either passed or failed with the WORKS performance package tune? I seem to remember the package was advertised as being CARB compliant, and it runs a completely different tune.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2020 | 06:17 AM
  #162  
Biggiesacks's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,690
Likes: 708
From: West Coast
Originally Posted by beatmania
Has anyone either passed or failed with the WORKS performance package tune? I seem to remember the package was advertised as being CARB compliant, and it runs a completely different tune.
Does it have a C.A.R.B. EO number? If so your fine.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2020 | 06:18 AM
  #163  
Biggiesacks's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,690
Likes: 708
From: West Coast
Does anyone know if the CVN is in the mut table?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2020 | 06:46 AM
  #164  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by beatmania
Has anyone either passed or failed with the WORKS performance package tune? I seem to remember the package was advertised as being CARB compliant, and it runs a completely different tune.
They reflash the ECU just like everyone else. It changes the CVN just like everyone else. So, no.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2020 | 04:35 AM
  #165  
SpoilerOn's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Japan
Originally Posted by cdrinkh2o
2005 USDM EVO 8
ROM: 96940011
CALID: 1860A118AA
CVN: 2822E4BF

Note:
This is a stock ROM. It is not verified as passing the ref test - yet!
It looks like this CVN doesn't match the one from the tool posted here https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ge...tion-tool.html

Does your ROM content match the other stock 96940011 ROMs that are out there? And does the tool give a different value when run on your ROM?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 AM.