Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

763whp/595tq STOCK ECU, SpeedDensity, E85 by TTP!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 02:36 PM
  #136  
dtrackstar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 2
From: U.S of A
^ what about bigvalleys offer??
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #137  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Thank you GST, so it seems as though what I said about you, CBRD and myself being on the same page is very correct. I would agree completely with the numbers you posted being what I have seen between stock fuel and just a few break in miles and some real fresh fuel.

Maybe we can get MD involved in finding out what the problem is with TTP's dyno then. I'll ASSume he is being honest and hasn't messed with the dyno and since you, myself, CBRD and now another MD owner, Doug's Dynopower, have all seen the same basica numbers something is obviously WAY messed up.

The other similarity is GST, BR, Doug, CBRD all own MD-500-SE's and not the smaller Euro models.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 02:39 PM
  #138  
Cyloc's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Area
I would take BVP up on their offer and put an end this dyno war bullsh!t.

It is the same **** over and over in all the TTP threads. A dyno is a tool. The numbers are truely worthless, except for showing a difference in power before and after.

Scott you should start posting the before and after. This way at least a difference is shown, not just the end result that everyone argues about.

Last edited by Cyloc; Nov 5, 2009 at 02:41 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 02:39 PM
  #139  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I am not comparing 94 to 91. You didn't read what I wrote, not that it surprises me. At stock power levels, stock tune, stock AFR's I don't think there is going to be much power difference from 91 to 93/94 octane.

Just got another message to remind me STM's dyno is also the same as ours and their numbers are showing the same...........

How many dyno's does it take to show mine isn't abnormally low but someone else's is abnormally HIGH?

BVP's offer sure seems like a good one.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #140  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
cyloc, not true, the numbers if abnormally high are also a great selling point for a product or service you are trying to sell.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #141  
Cyloc's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Area
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
cyloc, not true, the numbers if abnormally high are also a great selling point for a product or service you are trying to sell.
I agree that they seem high. That is why he should show the difference of before and after. The difference may help settle any of the debates. People tend to be more impressed with the gains over peak numbers. At least they should be. The only reason i say that is bc, not all people can drive the same, even with the same power.

But I have also put my car on and installed multiple dynos. And I can tell you that dynojets also tend to read different between the eddie current and non-eddie current. There is not a huge difference only about 10 whp on most 2 Liters and about a little more on the strokers.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #142  
BigValley's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Originally Posted by dtrackstar
^ what about bigvalleys offer??

im waiting a reply for this also
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #143  
Most-Wanted's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 5
From: ATLANTA
Originally Posted by BigValley
Thats True!!!


I WILL OFFER 3 DYNO PULLS IN OUR DYNOJET FOR FREE FOR THIS CAR ....i wan to see what numbers put in our dyno

Let me know guys!
This seems like a good opportunity for Scott to clear the dyno debate. If I was him I would run over there and blast out a 750+ whp pass and shut everyone up..

Great results for the stock ecu BTW...
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 03:37 PM
  #144  
redleg225's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: M104
Originally Posted by most-wanted
this seems like a good opportunity for scott to clear the dyno debate. If i was him i would run over there and blast out a 750+ whp pass and shut everyone up..
+1

Last edited by redleg225; Nov 7, 2009 at 03:21 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #145  
EmeryatSTM's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
Based on your track times and dyno numbers I must have made damn near 800 whp with my stock motor on your dyno. My car weighed in at about the same as yours and trapped 142.8 breaking up (pushing open stock valve train @ 40+psi).


Bottom line is you need to re-calibrate your dyno or send it back as defective. On our dyno your car would read 550 or so.

Im not trying to bash you but come on, Even you can't possibly believe your numbers are accurate.

Before you come back with " I missed a gear or an IC pipe off" So did I



-Em

Last edited by EmeryatSTM; Nov 5, 2009 at 03:55 PM. Reason: add context
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 04:03 PM
  #146  
E VOL IX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay-Varina, NC
All im going to say is that We have had 3 MAYBE 4 cars tuned by TTP leave Fl and Come back to dyno just for fun or whatever at our location in Fayetteville which is a mustang 1100 i believe and make about the same power on ours and they did on his. So i dunno im not taking sides just giving some possible helpful info
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 03:17 PM
  #147  
0xDEAD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: central pa
Good work on the stock ecu.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 05:10 PM
  #148  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by E VOL IX
All im going to say is that We have had 3 MAYBE 4 cars tuned by TTP leave Fl and Come back to dyno just for fun or whatever at our location in Fayetteville which is a mustang 1100 i believe and make about the same power on ours and they did on his. So i dunno im not taking sides just giving some possible helpful info
We appreciate the third party independent account.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #149  
mx4life85's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 865
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
This thread got re-opened? Nice!!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 06:04 PM
  #150  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Well it seems as though I had some effect on getting this thread re-opened.

Now, TTP, how about taking that car to BVP and dyno'ing it? I'd like to think this discussion wasn't and effort to get the thread opened back up wasn't a waste of my time.

We have 6-7 Mustand Dyno owners using MD500SE's like mine who are are in agreement with our base numbers and our dyno's putting out very close to the same numbers. TTP's dyno isn't even in the same ball park as the rest of ours.

Let's compare it to BVP's and see what happens. Then maybe it's time to get Mustand Dyno involved so they can figure out what's going on with your dyno, maybe they screwed it up.

The roll weight is so vastly different from any other dyno it's hard to say what's going on.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:04 PM.