763whp/595tq STOCK ECU, SpeedDensity, E85 by TTP!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 9, 2009 | 12:58 PM

#316

dmoevo

Evolving Member

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Oct 2008

Posts: 372

Likes: 0

From: Florida

So I guess the resolution here would be to leave it uncorrected and not adding the TTPCF.

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:02 PM

#317

RyuEvoIX

Evolved Member

iTrader: (10)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 2,126

Likes: 1

From: Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by TTP Engineering

Better yet. Maybe just let Ryu take a crack at it. The TaeKwonDoe kid weighs about 40lbs less than me as it stands and I am rusty.

So your finally gonna put me in the game coach?

My *** is sore from sitting on the bench for so long.

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:02 PM

#318

localtoys73

Evolved Member

iTrader: (24)

Joined: Oct 2008

Posts: 1,028

Likes: 1

From: deltona

its not a ttp correction factor it is a feature on the mustang dyno

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:09 PM

#319

Mellon Racing

Account Disabled

iTrader: (38)

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 9,319

Likes: 1

From: Virginia Beach, Virginia

Quote:

Originally Posted by TTP Engineering

Mellon posted 705whp and 139mph traps. We posted 763wcf and 713 no correction with 143.3mph traps. There is nothing mystical about that.

the difference here is that mine was done on a dynojet and yours was a md and I think people expect yours would trap worlds higher since md are usually quite stingy with the numbers compared to dj and on top of that you made about 60 more whp.

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:11 PM

#320

RyuEvoIX

Evolved Member

iTrader: (10)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 2,126

Likes: 1

From: Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning

Uncorrected TTP only made 8whp peak more then your Dynojet figures Mellon.

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:12 PM

#321

dmoevo

Evolving Member

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Oct 2008

Posts: 372

Likes: 0

From: Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by localtoys73

its not a ttp correction factor it is a feature on the mustang dyno

Yes, I know. It was merely humor, but thank you for clearing that up

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:12 PM

#322

tscompusa2

Former Sponsor

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 5,375

Likes: 10

From: pa

Quote:

Originally Posted by localtoys73

its not a ttp correction factor it is a feature on the mustang dyno

lol

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:12 PM

#323

Mellon Racing

Account Disabled

iTrader: (38)

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 9,319

Likes: 1

From: Virginia Beach, Virginia

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyuEvoIX

Uncorrected TTP only made 8whp peak more then your Dynojet figures Mellon.

right but as you can see in the title of this thread, those weren't the ones posted which is why some people jumped on him about the numbers.

personally, I don't care one way or another, just trying to explain.

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:21 PM

#324

RyuEvoIX

Evolved Member

iTrader: (10)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 2,126

Likes: 1

From: Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning

Ok, I understand what your getting at.

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:22 PM

#325

TTP Engineering

Thread Starter

Account Disabled

iTrader: (465)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 8,824

Likes: 2

From: Central FL

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsm25psi to David Buschur

i was trying to stay out of here too, but since you posted this i will have to say something out about it too. You only stay behind your own people or who ever runs your engine, WE all know that. You and Mike got on my *** about me making 6.6 @111 pass while i was running 700hp then. Mike specially was on my *** about it, then ,lol what about a month later mellon same power does almost same 1/8 mile lil slower and guess what NOTHING from you or mike saying **** about his time.

I am glad that more people don't have their blinders on.

Last edited by TTP Engineering; Nov 9, 2009 at 01:33 PM.

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:23 PM

#326

detroit pistins

Evolved Member

iTrader: (102)

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 2,173

Likes: 19

From: Detroit

subscribed!

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:29 PM

#327

AWD Motorsports

Former Sponsor

iTrader: (211)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 9,665

Likes: 1

From: South Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsm25psi

i was trying to stay out of here too, but since you posted this i will have to say something out about it too. You only stay behind your own people or who ever runs your engine, WE all know that. You and Mike got on my *** about me making 6.6 @111 pass while i was running 700hp then. Mike specially was on my *** about it, then ,lol what about a month later mellon same power does almost same 1/8 mile lil slower and guess what NOTHING from you or mike saying **** about his time.

This thread can go on for ever, Evey one asking TTP to re dyno it seems it wont happen, so I dont know why people are still asking or telling him to redyno the car. If he was planing too he would have already said YES, so just leave it alone. As far as we know in USA he did set the highest MPH record and ET so

so just leave it at that.

DOnt take it personal.. I dont buy into any dyno dynamics #'s and MD #'s that are higher than we show on our dynojet and run much slower.. Honestly i dont even care anymore though but since you mentioned me i responded..

My signature speaks for itself..

NO dynojet HP records and a ton of track records.. In 2 years i havent had 1 post questioning my HP #'s on any car we have so makes life much easier on me and i can work each day with a clear conscience.. We dont sell dyno records we sell track results..

Mike

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:32 PM

#328

SloRice

Evolved Member

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 1,347

Likes: 0

From: West Chester, OH

So, TTP's car makes 708whp uncorrected and runs 143MPH.

My car made 614whp uncorrected on BR's dyno and ran a best of 146.81MPH

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:34 PM

#329

David Buschur

Evolved Member

iTrader: (53)

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 14,622

Likes: 32

BTW, I will say this, nice job on the 143 mph run on the stock ECU, speed density set up, seriously. That is not my issue, that is a good job no matter what the numbers say. My issue is clear and I've stated it plenty of times, no sense in typing it again.

So in case you missed it. TTP, nice job going 143 mph on the stock ECU with Speed density and E85. That part of all this is an accomplishment.

Nov 9, 2009 | 01:34 PM

#330

dsm25psi

Evolved Member

iTrader: (44)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 914

Likes: 0

From: Charlotte,NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports

i dont, dont worry i still bought some stuff from your website

I really wanted to take the car to the 1/4 track but its about 2 hours away, plus if something happens thats a huge bill to tow it back, i wish i had a truck with trailer. the car will go to the 1.4 track with new setup thats for sure

Reply Share

First
Prev
22 / 27
Next
Last