Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

CBRD new BBKB results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #136  
YogSaahoth's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 780
Likes: 8
From: NY/PA
Originally Posted by evoviii272tbe
glad to hear and it seems most people I asked feel somewhat the same. dont want to be greedy but if I am making 330whp now with stock VIII turbo on E-85 (just exhaust and cams), what kind of gain can i realistilcally/conservatively expect?
I believe the other bbk-b dyno graph shows an overlay with the previous tomei arms setup...with an increase of about 70whp over that turbo. the tomei turbo has been shown to be not so great, but i would still bet it makes more power than an 8 turbo. I would worry more about having enough injector to support the bbk-b. a stock intercooler might be holding u back a bit also at that power level
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 12:39 PM
  #137  
evoviii272tbe's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by YogSaahoth
I believe the other bbk-b dyno graph shows an overlay with the previous tomei arms setup...with an increase of about 70whp over that turbo. the tomei turbo has been shown to be not so great, but i would still bet it makes more power than an 8 turbo. I would worry more about having enough injector to support the bbk-b. a stock intercooler might be holding u back a bit also at that power level
good point about the Tomei vs. stock VIII turbo. Yes i've been thinking about my exisiting Walbro setup and RC1000cc's and wondering if an upgrade is needed going from stock turbo to BBK-B and staying with E-85. i do believe a few of GST's customer Evo VIIIs (with BBK full and on E-85) are doing 400+whp with single walbro and 1000cc or larger injectors. Also definitely going with a 3.5" FMIC.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 06:27 PM
  #138  
atkins's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: delaware
Originally Posted by evoviii272tbe
good point about the Tomei vs. stock VIII turbo. Yes i've been thinking about my exisiting Walbro setup and RC1000cc's and wondering if an upgrade is needed going from stock turbo to BBK-B and staying with E-85. i do believe a few of GST's customer Evo VIIIs (with BBK full and on E-85) are doing 400+whp with single walbro and 1000cc or larger injectors. Also definitely going with a 3.5" FMIC.


im pretty sure chad maxed out a set of 1000cc injectors with the bbk-b on pump gas so if you are trying to run big numbers on e-85 you will need bigger injectors and possibly a double pumper.

i think you could definately reach 400 with e85 and a bbk full, i was able to do so on 93 pump gas. best all around turbo in my mind.

jeff
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 08:49 PM
  #139  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by atkins
im pretty sure chad maxed out a set of 1000cc injectors with the bbk-b on pump gas....jeff
Post up a link please!
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 06:31 AM
  #140  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by atkins
im pretty sure chad maxed out a set of 1000cc injectors with the bbk-b on pump gas so if you are trying to run big numbers on e-85 you will need bigger injectors and possibly a double pumper.

...

jeff
A BBK-B isn't big enough to max out a single pump or 1000 cc/min injectors on pump gas. The issue had to have been fuel pump. For sure though, 1200+ cc/min injectors and a double pumper will be needed for a BBK-B in kill mode with E85.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 08:16 AM
  #141  
atkins's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: delaware
Originally Posted by CBRD
ran into some problems with fueling yet again,

walbro in tank, 1000cc, going lean up top, either need to bump the pressure a little, or go to a double pumper, surpised we had that issue..

other car will go back on the dyno tomorrow, and another next week for back to back,

charlie (kreonic) was here to watch the tuning fun... we both smiled at the just under 460whp pull (the 3rd pull lol)..

cb
taken from page 3 of this thread!!

jeff
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 12:35 PM
  #142  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by atkins
taken from page 3 of this thread!!

jeff
A single Walbro with 1000 cc/min injectors and E85 is good for 400 whp on the GST Mustang Dyno. I can't see how an extra 60 whp but with pump gas is going to max out that combination of injector and fuel pump.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 04:13 PM
  #143  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Not at a peak pwr AFR, but maybe trying to maintain 11.4 AFR. Could be something else without knowing fuel pressure
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #144  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by mrfred
A single Walbro with 1000 cc/min injectors and E85 is good for 400 whp on the GST Mustang Dyno. I can't see how an extra 60 whp but with pump gas is going to max out that combination of injector and fuel pump.
The particular pump in Chads test may have been going south and not delivering enough volume. I agree with mrfred, that a healthy , single WALBRO and 1000's should have plenty of headroom leftover on a BBK-B on a pumpgas tune. This combo would be sufficient on a pumpgas Red which supposedly flows the same air through its compressor as the BBK-B.

Last edited by sparky; Aug 8, 2010 at 05:24 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #145  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Thanks for the reference Atkins. Do you happen to know what boost level and AFR's the car in question was running?

EDIT: I read on another thread that on a BBK-B equipped car at about 30#, albeit with rich AFR's, on a pumpgas tune at 460 WHP on CBRD's Mustang dyno they were maxing out a single WALBRO. So, I don't think that it is the 1000 cc injectors, but rather the pump that is going wimpy. Maybe they need to either hotwire the pump, or try a KenneBell Boost a Pump. This way they could avoid going to a double pumper maybe! Still that BBK-B is sure flowing a lot of air. Also, they are tring to keep the pump gas tune safely on the rich side.

Last edited by sparky; Aug 8, 2010 at 05:42 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 05:45 PM
  #146  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by atkins

i think you could definately reach 400 with e85 and a bbk full, i was able to do so on 93 pump gas. best all around turbo in my mind.

jeff
We've had multiple customers do 430-460whp with a BBK Full on E85 on the Evo 8/9. For some comparison data, the BBX has been putting down around 430-450whp on E85 on the Evo 10 platform.

Normal for 91 pump has been around 340-370whp with one particulary well setup Evo 9 hitting 400whp on 91 oct at only 24.5psi

Had a BBK-B on the dyno last night but had some technical difficulties with the car, possible boost leak. Even with that, the turbo had no problem holding 29psi to 7500 rpm (even with a 2.3L) and putting down 500whp. This was the same car that put down 502whp on E85 with the Beta BBK-B. It will be back soon at full health.

For some comparison data on that car, with the normal BBK Full it put down 460whp on E85 with the 2.3L. So far the BBK-B is putting down 40whp+ over the BBK Full on that car. That car maxed out the single pump on E85 at around 475whp. For the 500whp it now has a BlaqOps progressive double pumper.



- Bryan

Last edited by GST Motorsports; Aug 8, 2010 at 05:53 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 06:17 PM
  #147  
EvolutinIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rancho NM
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
We've had multiple customers do 430-460whp with a BBK Full on E85 on the Evo 8/9. For some comparison data, the BBX has been putting down around 430-450whp on E85 on the Evo 10 platform.

Normal for 91 pump has been around 340-370whp with one particulary well setup Evo 9 hitting 400whp on 91 oct at only 24.5psi

Had a BBK-B on the dyno last night but had some technical difficulties with the car, possible boost leak. Even with that, the turbo had no problem holding 29psi to 7500 rpm (even with a 2.3L) and putting down 500whp. This was the same car that put down 502whp on E85 with the Beta BBK-B. It will be back soon at full health.

For some comparison data on that car, with the normal BBK Full it put down 460whp on E85 with the 2.3L. So far the BBK-B is putting down 40whp+ over the BBK Full on that car. That car maxed out the single pump on E85 at around 475whp. For the 500whp it now has a BlaqOps progressive double pumper.



- Bryan
Good info, thank you sir. I was hoping for 450hp with the B on 91 octane, I think I may have set my goals a bit high...
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 07:33 PM
  #148  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
Any chance i could be an independant tester. Turns out my issues have more then likely been the head of the car so I will be fixing the valves and keeping my tubular manifold. Head will be coming off soon and I don't want to do the same work twice.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 06:31 AM
  #149  
mynx87's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: central cali
Great info thanks for sharing Brian
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #150  
Xolition's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Curious on a BBK-B, E85, built 2.3 engine combination. Anyone venture a guess at 32-35psi? 500+?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:49 AM.