Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

LR 2.4 + HTA86 + E85 results and info inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 10:59 PM
  #91  
06MREvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by tscompusa
whats this look like? http://youtu.be/hIUwRR5Uf-0
Slow...
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 11:07 PM
  #92  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by 06MREvo
Slow...
ill show you slow spool was dog **** in that vid, so def nothing impressive for a 2.3. peak tq is tuned conservative also so leaving torque on the table also. also that was 95degrees outside. ok i cant think of any more excuses.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2011 | 12:00 AM
  #93  
06MREvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by tscompusa
ill show you slow spool was dog **** in that vid, so def nothing impressive for a 2.3. peak tq is tuned conservative also so leaving torque on the table also. also that was 95degrees outside. ok i cant think of any more excuses.
Your flux capacitor wasn't charged??? Vtec fluid was low?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2011 | 12:03 AM
  #94  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by 06MREvo
Your flux capacitor wasn't charged??? Vtec fluid was low?
ya and the muffler bearings were seized up also.

oh and it was running on diesel fuel also LOL.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2011 | 05:22 AM
  #95  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
Dont forge the JDM blinker fluid.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 03:28 PM
  #96  
ta ace's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: wichita, KS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=4Q6oiXuoUW4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=exJNPv0iXr8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=kOVfRNZwcK8

storm was moving in and it was very hot / muggy out

Last edited by ta ace; Jun 26, 2011 at 03:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 05:33 PM
  #97  
3gEclipseTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: ma
I didnt read the whole thread but did you try nonprotruding tip plugs? I was having blow out issues even with a .017 gap and switched to nonprotruding plugs gapped to .019 and problem solved.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 09:08 PM
  #98  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by 3gEclipseTurbo
I didnt read the whole thread but did you try nonprotruding tip plugs? I was having blow out issues even with a .017 gap and switched to nonprotruding plugs gapped to .019 and problem solved.
He doesn't have any spark issues anymore, that was a long time ago when i first started tuning him. we upgraded the ignition and that problem was gone.

usually if it doesn't stop blowing out past 0.19 i try to adjust the dwell on the ecu for the ignition, and if that doesn't work, then we upgrade ignition. and also like you said sometimes the plug type fixes it also.

Last edited by tscompusa2; Jun 29, 2011 at 09:25 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 09:12 PM
  #99  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
ok heres where his car sits atm when its trapping 128mph, so it should have 133 or more in it with a good pass id imagine.

he said this was 85f outside.

granted the timing is lower then what it initially was at the beginning results on this thread, the weather changed the tune a bit as well.

when he gets some free time ill put some more strength back into the tune, but based on what we have here it looks like the car will not make it past 650 as it sits without changing to bigger cams or removing some bottlenecks that exist.

Last edited by tscompusa2; Jun 29, 2011 at 09:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 11:05 PM
  #100  
S13 Curtis's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Orlando,FL
it lost alot of power
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 11:28 PM
  #101  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by S13 Curtis
it lost alot of power
yep its what i expected though. around the 620-630 range. the tune is dialed down for safety and the weather is responsible for a good 40whp i would say. still tho 600/500 should be trapping about 134-135 so after he changes to diff wheels and slicks i bet he gets his mph. it was his decision to have the tune conservative (safe).

from the logs i got from him we can make it spool quicker & give it more torque also.. so that will help also. ill add some timing back for him also uptop to get rid of that flat HP curve.. but the idea is to make the car reliable and powerful which has been accomplished in my opinion. hes been beating on this car for months now. its taken out high 9 second cars on the street from rolls.. the cars just not prepped for a track and the experience isn't 100% there.

ill work with him to assure it runs through the gears clean and tune each gear that way next time he goes back to the track the car will be ready to go with its slicks and smaller wheels.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2011 | 03:27 PM
  #102  
bambooi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: NC
My guess was close.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2011 | 08:11 PM
  #103  
Creamo3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
How much boost is it running now and how much timing did you pull? Also noticed the weight went up on this recent pull, what caused that? 100whp drop is pretty extreme even in warmer weather. Lighter wheels/tires might help the trap MPH from rotational losses, but the traction from slicks could actually lower the overall trap speed from cutting a better ET. I've noticed higher trap speeds when I cut a bad 60' vs lower traps w/ a decent 60' & ET. There are definitely some bottlenecks in the setup holding things back here.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2011 | 09:11 PM
  #104  
CMB's Avatar
CMB
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: Near water
Originally Posted by Creamo3
How much boost is it running now and how much timing did you pull? Also noticed the weight went up on this recent pull, what caused that? 100whp drop is pretty extreme even in warmer weather. Lighter wheels/tires might help the trap MPH from rotational losses, but the traction from slicks could actually lower the overall trap speed from cutting a better ET. I've noticed higher trap speeds when I cut a bad 60' vs lower traps w/ a decent 60' & ET. There are definitely some bottlenecks in the setup holding things back here.
Prolly had his girl in the car...or 2 kids in the back seat

Thats a lotta weight for someone trying to go fast. Put that pig on a diet man
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2011 | 10:29 PM
  #105  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by Creamo3
How much boost is it running now and how much timing did you pull? Also noticed the weight went up on this recent pull, what caused that? 100whp drop is pretty extreme even in warmer weather. Lighter wheels/tires might help the trap MPH from rotational losses, but the traction from slicks could actually lower the overall trap speed from cutting a better ET. I've noticed higher trap speeds when I cut a bad 60' vs lower traps w/ a decent 60' & ET. There are definitely some bottlenecks in the setup holding things back here.
its running about 34psi uptop
i pulled about 2deg. in this car that's about 35whp and varies at lower rpm. its running 16deg at redline right now.

his gf was in the car.

also the log is 1byte RPM capped so its repeating 7968.75. so it may be more or less power uptop. i cant tell. we need to log 2byte rpm.

i thought a taller tire will always give more trap? he never passed the finish at the track reving out.. he always got cut off early.

i agree i think the cams are a big cause and maybe the fmic? the fmic doesn't have much info about it in the evo community that i know of. he doesnt want to change anything right now on his setup though.. so we have to work with what we got for now.

i did some mods to the rom i think it will gain an additional 30whp uptop based on what i changed so i will report back.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:20 PM.