Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

MAP EF-series Turbochargers results thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 08:49 AM
  #1531  
NateEvans's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: MN
First of all...I want to thank everyone for continuing to add data and feedback to this thread. Looking through the information, here, is beneficial for the entire community.

I tend to agree with the input from everyone else. I would highly suggest starting to address fueling issues before changing the pump out...the pump is capable of supporting much more power and every little bit helps. I consider hard wiring of pumps...even factory pumps, to be mandatory...and even MORE so when you go to larger pumps. Something like a Walbro 400 pump will actually demand a lot of power...power which the stock wires can't handle. I typically go so far as to actually sealed bulkhead fitting the sending unit and run the larger wiring directly to the pump to ensure the most amount of voltage getting to the pump.

Beyond THAT, fluid dynamics dictate that a single restriction will cause pressure increase across the entire system. To that end, it is best to reduce the restrictions wherever the pop up. For example, we ran a DSM on a DEA 300 on E85 some years back and it made 630+WHP...only a couple of months ago, we ran almost the same fueling setup on a similar car and saw the same pump max out at just around 500WHP...upon trouble shooting, it was determined that the only difference between the two setups was the fuel feed side after the filter. The larger HP car was running one of our fuel feed line kits...the lower HP car was running the stock line...that length of line is approximately 1.5 feet in length...but was creating enough restriction to decrease the entire system's efficiency enough to cause the deficiency.

I would suggest hardwiring the stock pump, changing out to an aftermarket FPR/Install kit to dial in the base fuel pressure and see where that gets you first...just to start heading in a positive direction with the minimal investment.

Nate
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 09:29 AM
  #1532  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Do not hardwire a W416 with the stock return line. You'll not be able to control fuel pressure under low load conditions.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 10:52 AM
  #1533  
rs03evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: SACRAMENTO, CA
Originally Posted by mrfred
Do not hardwire a W416 with the stock return line. You'll not be able to control fuel pressure under low load conditions.
This was My understanding from what I read.. that's why i didn't run re-wire kit.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 11:27 AM
  #1534  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by mrfred
Do not hardwire a W416 with the stock return line. You'll not be able to control fuel pressure under low load conditions.
I had the wally 450 hardwired last year with FIC2150's on E85 and stock return.

I think the lowest base fuel pressure we could get was 55psi but I had an AEM AFPR and it seemed to work ok.

But needless to say, lots of P0300's from weird fueling and the idle took a long time to dial in.

I would also not recommend haha.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 08:14 PM
  #1535  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,636
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by murlo26
Injectors aren't it either I don't think.

On my 2.2L I maxed out at 630whp or so on E85 with a wally 450 and 1300cc injectors. There are a lot of other restrictions this car has.

I had fuel feed line (6AN), AFPR, boomba fuel rail and I modified my return in my basket to reduce pressure.

Instead of getting new injectors or spending money on a new pump it might make sense to upgrade other parts of your fuel system. Just saying.
wow. that is a lot of power on e85 and those injectors. what was the DC?? i'm pretty high at >500whp on 1450s.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 08:49 PM
  #1536  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by kaj
wow. that is a lot of power on e85 and those injectors. what was the DC?? i'm pretty high at >500whp on 1450s.
The -6 AN feedline makes a huge difference.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 03:34 PM
  #1537  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,636
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by mrfred
The -6 AN feedline makes a huge difference.
true dat!
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 05:22 PM
  #1538  
VKEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: WPB, Florida
Anybody had a good experience with these turbo, like issues kaj mentioned above or the miles you have put on these turbos??. I'm looking to upgrade to the ef2 or ef2.5 down the road.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 06:15 PM
  #1539  
Raptord's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 20
From: Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
My EF2's been fine, I have about 20-25k miles on it.

I actually don't remember hearing about anyone having issues with EF2's. Seems like the 2.5's have been the most troublesome.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 09:55 PM
  #1540  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,636
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by VKEVO
Anybody had a good experience with these turbo, like issues kaj mentioned above or the miles you have put on these turbos??. I'm looking to upgrade to the ef2 or ef2.5 down the road.

I'm very happy with the 2.5s power delivery
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 06:46 PM
  #1541  
ODUB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 2
From: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Originally Posted by VKEVO
Anybody had a good experience with these turbo, like issues kaj mentioned above or the miles you have put on these turbos??. I'm looking to upgrade to the ef2 or ef2.5 down the road.
I had two EF2.5's fail with less than 250 miles on each. They failed back to back on a fresh fully built 2.0. I've been dealing with this since May, and I'm still trying to get a refund from MAP so I can get another turbo. My tuner put a stock turbo he had laying around on the car just to get it back to me, otherwise it would still just be parked like it has been for the last 5 months. It's been running strong for 300+ miles now with the used stock turbo. I'm picking the car up this weekend while he continues to deal with MAP. Then I'll have to make the 460 mile trip back out there to get the new turbo put on whenever all of this finally gets settled.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 07:07 PM
  #1542  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,636
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by ODUB
I had two EF2.5's fail with less than 250 miles on each. They failed back to back on a fresh fully built 2.0. I've been dealing with this since May, and I'm still trying to get a refund from MAP so I can get another turbo. My tuner put a stock turbo he had laying around on the car just to get it back to me, otherwise it would still just be parked like it has been for the last 5 months. It's been running strong for 300+ miles now with the used stock turbo. I'm picking the car up this weekend while he continues to deal with MAP. Then I'll have to make the 460 mile trip back out there to get the new turbo put on whenever all of this finally gets settled.
Why don't you install your own turbo? Takes a couple hours and saves you a TON of trouble.
Also, out of curiosity, was either of yours the newer design?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 08:54 PM
  #1543  
ODUB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 2
From: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Originally Posted by kaj
Why don't you install your own turbo? Takes a couple hours and saves you a TON of trouble.
Also, out of curiosity, was either of yours the newer design?
I don't have the time, the tools, or the dyno to tune it on. The whole thing was supposed to be a one stop deal. Rebuilt the motor, new turbo, install/cornerbalance coilovers, and some other preventative maintenance items. Everything else is done. Just waiting on the turbo now.

As for if it was a new or old, I'm not sure. They were ordered/built/fell apart back in March/April, so whichever was available at the time.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2014 | 01:34 AM
  #1544  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,591
Likes: 303
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by ODUB
I don't have the time, the tools, or the dyno to tune it on. The whole thing was supposed to be a one stop deal. Rebuilt the motor, new turbo, install/cornerbalance coilovers, and some other preventative maintenance items. Everything else is done. Just waiting on the turbo now.

As for if it was a new or old, I'm not sure. They were ordered/built/fell apart back in March/April, so whichever was available at the time.





Who built your motor just out of curiosity? For 2 turbos to fail back to back with that many miles on them sounds to me it could be one of 2 things. One would be crap left in the motor that reached the turbo after a fresh rebuild, or 2 you put the turbo on the car, didn't use the correct oil spot and beat the **** out of it for the first 200 miles on a dyno/street. To me it sounds like the second situation being the first one would more then likely cause other issues in the motor. It is funny how both of them failed around the same mileage but yet a stock turbo worked just fine to me that sounds like abuse and lack of oiling causing the turbo to kill itself. Turbos don't just fall apart. Hell even **** turbos off ebay will last longer then that.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2014 | 06:46 AM
  #1545  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by kaj
wow. that is a lot of power on e85 and those injectors. what was the DC?? i'm pretty high at >500whp on 1450s.
Didn't check, very high.

Here is what it looked like for AFR's, I needed more injector for sure. My fuel pickup in tank wasn't perfect though either so that was probably contributing slightly but for sure out of injector. Call this 600+whp, it wasn't a perfectly flat road so I won't guess what it was but it's up, I'd guess 640ish but who knows.

Name:  Newlogtoday.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  63.6 KB
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:18 PM.