Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

MAP EF4 e85 built 2L tuned by tscompusa/vr-speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2011 | 05:34 PM
  #76  
4g63evoeight's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
From: Albany NY
Originally Posted by tscompusa
he stayed in front the entire time. all i know is that it was a alphra 9 GTR.. even on pump gas they run low 10's. on racegas they are in the high 9's.

i was told he did race the switzer e900 and obviously got pulled on. but seeing the video and seeing how much gap there is between cars is still something very interesting to see.. it gives us an idea how a 580whp~ evo fairs against a 800whp GTR.

I have not seen footage of it yet though myself.
when you get the vids post them on highboost!!!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2011 | 06:05 PM
  #77  
RSMike's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 372
From: New Zealand
Originally Posted by S13 Curtis
-1 You my friend are an idiot.
Do you really go wide open from every streetlight?
If you want all that low end power go buy a Camaro.
He's not an idiot, he's opinionated.
There is nothing wrong with that.

At the end of the day, it depends what the client wants.
Personally WHAT I WANT is similar to Jerry.
Thats why i built a 2.3 with Mivec and a FP Red turbo.
Full boost @ 3500-3800 yes please.

Cheers, Mike
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2011 | 06:36 PM
  #78  
ecktt's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 256
Likes: 2
From: Trinidad
Originally Posted by RSMike
He's not an idiot, he's opinionated.
There is nothing wrong with that.

At the end of the day, it depends what the client wants.
Personally WHAT I WANT is similar to Jerry.
Thats why i built a 2.3 with Mivec and a FP Red turbo.
Full boost @ 3500-3800 yes please.

Cheers, Mike
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2011 | 06:58 PM
  #79  
turboimpala's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: flint
Originally Posted by 4g63evoeight
when you get the vids post them on highboost!!!
Keep looking in this thread. i will keep posting videos until they get removed. This weekend should be good. going to run a few local guys. Including my buddies GTR E900!!!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2011 | 08:30 PM
  #80  
4g63evoeight's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
From: Albany NY
Good deal
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 01:32 AM
  #81  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 298
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by RSMike
He's not an idiot, he's opinionated.
There is nothing wrong with that.

At the end of the day, it depends what the client wants.
Personally WHAT I WANT is similar to Jerry.
Thats why i built a 2.3 with Mivec and a FP Red turbo.
Full boost @ 3500-3800 yes please.

Cheers, Mike
No Mike he is an idiot, look at the facts we all put out to him then he throws out cars that are much different with totally different turbos tring to compair.

Originally Posted by S13 Curtis

If you want all that low end power go buy a Camaro.


I have an 01 Berger camaro ss and that really doesnt come alive in the power band till nearly 3500 rpms and that thing comes stock with 405hp
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 02:12 AM
  #82  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by cursedsm
No Mike he is an idiot, look at the facts we all put out to him then he throws out cars that are much different with totally different turbos tring to compair.



I have an 01 Berger camaro ss and that really doesnt come alive in the power band till nearly 3500 rpms and that thing comes stock with 405hp
I have been in the 4g63 hobby for 15 years and turbo hobby for 30 years. You have no idea what knowledge I have. You sound like a 16 year old punk who paid big bucks to have his car built. Then you get all butt hurt when someone with knowledge comes along tells you your setup isnt all that from a poor choice of turbo.

600hp 460 tq are suck *** laggy numbers dude. dont even need a dyno graph to know that, thats how uneducated you really are. learn to read dyno graphs and except criticism. or get old before your time. I built a 600hp 570tq 4g63 in a sub 2600lb car eight years ago before the evolution board even came along. and your telling me your car is responsive I am not gonna learn anything from you. you obviously have lots to learn.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 09:52 AM
  #83  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but its pretty obvious that people have different goals and expectations for their cars. I can't wait until we get more results from these turbochargers as we currently have a very small sample set to work with compared to the plethora of FP Black configurations out there.

In regards to that EFR 7670 it is certainly impressive. However, how long did that customer have to wait to get the turbo? And how much did he have to spend to utilize it? I'm betting it was more than double the investment these guys made on their EF4. (Edit: Actually it was far more than double with that dual wastegate setup)

Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
new turbos should always improve on the old designs. if they dont they are failures.
This is where you're wrong. Our motivation to launch this program wasn't based on quality or performance deficiencies it was based on availability issues and a lack of customer service from one of the main players. Don't get me wrong improving performance over existing product offerings and continually improving our own product is at the forefront of our efforts, but there are several other factors to consider when measuring the success of a product.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 01:04 PM
  #84  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Here's a few more apples for the EF4 basket, 300 ft/lbs before 4000 on the Evo IX and between 3700-3800 on the 2.4L Evo 8.

2006 Evo IX



Evo 8 2.4L


Last edited by ChrisCarey; Sep 9, 2011 at 01:06 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 01:16 PM
  #85  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
learn to read dyno graphs and except criticism.

I am not gonna learn anything from you.
How about grammar? Just sayin'
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 01:54 PM
  #86  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 298
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
I have been in the 4g63 hobby for 15 years and turbo hobby for 30 years. You have no idea what knowledge I have. You sound like a 16 year old punk who paid big bucks to have his car built. Then you get all butt hurt when someone with knowledge comes along tells you your setup isnt all that from a poor choice of turbo.

600hp 460 tq are suck *** laggy numbers dude. dont even need a dyno graph to know that, thats how uneducated you really are. learn to read dyno graphs and except criticism. or get old before your time. I built a 600hp 570tq 4g63 in a sub 2600lb car eight years ago before the evolution board even came along. and your telling me your car is responsive I am not gonna learn anything from you. you obviously have lots to learn.
hahaha Just so you know I don't sound like a 16 year old kid I am a 35 year old kid who has been playing with dsms and now evos since 94 so what ever dude. Whats next your gonna tell me you have a 12 inch ****. I highly doubt that too. Oh and as for someone building my car uh no I do all of my own work and what I cannot do I have a buddy help me do it. Its funny how people like you get butt hurt and then always take the same defence I did this I did that blah blah blah. You sound like a ragging old ****ing lady do you realize that. The sob story you just said makes me laugh cause who hasnt made those kinda #s on a older turbo vehicle? Obviously you don't have to much knowledge because there are 3 other people on here who said the same thing I did when your compairing x amount of dyno graphs with cars in 4th gear and a couple with stroker motors tring to pass that its some ungodly ****in graph and how much better it is then this turbo. Sure we all have our own opinions and obviously my opinion of you is your a ****in idiot and I think you just proven with this last post your imatureity. So what else do you have for me? I can do this all day.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 01:59 PM
  #87  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
No more bickering, everyone leave it at that and move on.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 02:01 PM
  #88  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 298
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by Kracka
No more bickering, everyone leave it at that and move on.
sorry brotha you posted as I was replying hahaha. My dyno graphs will come as soon as it stops monsooning
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 02:04 PM
  #89  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
All good
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 07:19 PM
  #90  
turboimpala's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: flint
Well it rained south of here tonight so i had to stay home. it was dry around me so i fixed some things. like the leaky PCV and threw on a Tial Q BOV. Made some passes the new graphs will be posted shortly. Seems like those were both holding me a back a little bit.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:57 PM.