605whp FP Green DBB
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (77)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 618
Likes: 3
From: Pittsburgh, PA
That turbo would crush the Green up top, especially if it was run at 39 psi(it's equal to a Red), Peak DJ boost was only 31.xx falling to 24ish, on the road or on a MD I can get it to hit 35+ and hold 27. So the Green will be better for low end power than the 3076HTA but will give up roughly 50 up top.
Which turbo do you think would preform better on a pump gas car (91 or 93 octane)?
FP Green DBB, what can I say it's my favorite turbo and now in a reliable bullet proof DBB configuration. First pull yielded 597/499 right off the street, second 602/503. third with a few more clicks on the MBC 605/529. That is pretty much the end of the map on this turbo, boost peaked at 31.5 and falls to 24.8 on the Dynojet, on the street it will hit 35ish and hold 26 with the cold air right now. So there you have it, one of the best street combos possible, BR 2.3RPM, FP Green DBB, ER SD, and pump E85(test E86 right now nice). These #'s are just a hair above(15% dyno diff) with what it did in the spring on Buschurs dyno at 533/424. Actually feels much faster with our cold weather than just 605 whp! Thanks Nate for letting me use the Dynojet.


Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (77)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 618
Likes: 3
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I see, both seem to be great options for fast spooling/power. Even with the lesser power potential I'd still gravitate towards the stock frame turbo to keep my budget lower. Although I haven't looked into the cost of a twinscroll t3 setup with hta 3076 vs sticking w/ the stock frame setups cost yet.
Which turbo do you think would preform better on a pump gas car (91 or 93 octane)?
Which turbo do you think would preform better on a pump gas car (91 or 93 octane)?
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
ER SD = English Racing Speed Density. It can be just JohnBradley's custom setup SD ROM and tune, but it can also include their their custom 4" MAF-less intake.
Congrats buddy, would have liked to see how a 4th gear pull would have effected the curve... I know torque would have come on faster and harder...
Last edited by Spec-Ops1; Nov 19, 2011 at 08:49 AM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (77)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 618
Likes: 3
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I was tempted but exploded a motor on my Talon on that dyno two years ago pulling 4th, 3rd gear made 811whp and 624tq at 34psi so we got brave turned the boost up to what I would have thought 38 but ended up being 40+ and went off the map(early ECMLINK SD version) and leaned out to 14-1, burned through the SS oring, the head and headgasket and exploded at about 6000 RPM at which point it was already at 724hp and 672 tq, so Ive been Mr. conservitive ever since!
I was tempted but exploded a motor on my Talon on that dyno two years ago pulling 4th, 3rd gear made 811whp and 624tq at 34psi so we got brave turned the boost up to what I would have thought 38 but ended up being 40+ and went off the map(early ECMLINK SD version) and leaned out to 14-1, burned through the SS oring, the head and headgasket and exploded at about 6000 RPM at which point it was already at 724hp and 672 tq, so Ive been Mr. conservitive ever since!


