Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Official "Pure" 91 octane evo thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2013 | 12:07 PM
  #106  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by Nimpoc
Is this a stock 8 turbo car? Looks too laggy and has way too much power. Stock pump and injectors too? Maybe someone could update the mod list?
It had a BB HTA Green.

IIRC injectors were RC 1000s.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2013 | 07:46 AM
  #107  
HsamehH's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 4
From: EGYPT
The HTA Green is awesome turbo and makes decent power but needs more than 2.0L if it's AutoX car..we had to switch from 2.0L to 86mm 2.3L to make peak torque around 3900-4000rpm,could be better if using S1 Cams..i am using S2 and it broke 400 easy with no more than 22 psi.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2013 | 06:29 PM
  #108  
RMDZidane's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Originally Posted by Nimpoc
Were the injectors really needs for that power level, or do you not have an upgraded fuel pump? Over in the 'What injectors do I need' thread it seems people move up toward 400whp before they go static if they have a Wally 255, etc.

Hi Nimpoc. I have a Walbro 255. The 850cc injectors are at 80% duty cycle after the tune, so I'm glad I got them.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2013 | 04:39 PM
  #109  
Nimpoc's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 402
Likes: 6
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Thanks for the reply RMD,

I ask because over in this thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...511951&page=22

It was suggested stk injectors were good for 400whp. Also in there was commentary that the IDC reported by EvoScan isn't spot on, and static is closer to 120%. To be sure I'm just asking questions here and trying to learn! Glad your system is running well.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2013 | 04:28 PM
  #110  
thatguy5's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Norcal
Originally Posted by Nimpoc
Is this a stock 8 turbo car? Looks too laggy and has way too much power. Stock pump and injectors too? Maybe someone could update the mod list?
yeah lol i forgot some mods, thanks for pointing it out
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 01:21 AM
  #111  
RMDZidane's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Originally Posted by Nimpoc
Thanks for the reply RMD,

I ask because over in this thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...511951&page=22

It was suggested stk injectors were good for 400whp. Also in there was commentary that the IDC reported by EvoScan isn't spot on, and static is closer to 120%. To be sure I'm just asking questions here and trying to learn! Glad your system is running well.
Hi Nimpoc. It wasn't worth it to me not to get injectors. On the dyno I was on the general consensus is stock injectors start to do weird things around 290whp. Thats why I got higher flowing ones. I just purchased a LICP, and I'm 'eyeing' various intercoolers now too. I'll probably get S1 cams as well when I do a timing belt replacement....then I'll have more 91 dynos to show
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 06:34 PM
  #112  
RMDZidane's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Added an ETS IC and made adjustments to the cars tune. 91 oct. on a Mustang dyno:
313awhp, 305 ft-lb tq. Very conservative numbers because I want to minimize the chances of my 116k mi. motor blowing up while at a HPDE

Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 07:01 PM
  #113  
BEKevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 718
Likes: 2
From: Ventura, Ca
RMDZ, with just the addition of the ETS IC & lower pipe you made great gains! (IIRC about ~ 50 whp/wtq) Congrats
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 07:50 PM
  #114  
RMDZidane's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Originally Posted by BEKevo
RMDZ, with just the addition of the ETS IC & lower pipe you made great gains! (IIRC about ~ 50 whp/wtq) Congrats

Oh no! I added just about everything except cams So 50+hp is decent but only after a 71hta, IC and and a full 3" exhaust w/O2 housing.
I probably won't add any more parts because I'm starting to eye C6 Z06's as well as some other potential replacement cars
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 09:54 PM
  #115  
BEKevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 718
Likes: 2
From: Ventura, Ca
Originally Posted by RMDZidane
Oh no! I added just about everything except cams So 50+hp is decent but only after a 71hta, IC and and a full 3" exhaust w/O2 housing.
I probably won't add any more parts because I'm starting to eye C6 Z06's as well as some other potential replacement cars
Haha I was going to say.. Congrats anyways!
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2013 | 05:44 PM
  #116  
spinner85's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 231
Likes: 2
From: RAF Lakenheath, UK
Nice thread can't wait to post my results! Hopefully by the end of June I'll get 'er on the dyno.
I've got all the parts either waiting or on the way, I'm just not with my Evo atm
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 06:55 PM
  #117  
lostsoulsevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 771
Likes: 3
From: Ohau
virtual dyno was done uphill.

Evo 9 turbo
STM catback w/aluminum race pipe
STM UICP
STM LICP
Bushcur Street core FMIC
Tial BOV
Maperformance 02 eliminator downpipe
1450cc FIC inj
Buschur Double pumper
Omni 4 bar
TScomp 4'' SD intake
Grimmspeed 3 port

tuned 28 psi on SD/ECU boost

next will be cams, ported IM/EM, 65mm TB tuned on 91 and E85
Attached Thumbnails Official "Pure" 91 octane evo thread-test2.jpg  
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 08:19 PM
  #118  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
^ Why do a VD pull uphill??

And 28psi and barely 300hp....
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 09:04 PM
  #119  
lostsoulsevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 771
Likes: 3
From: Ohau
Originally Posted by Boosted Tuning
^ Why do a VD pull uphill??

And 28psi and barely 300hp....
tscomp was tuning me, and i wanted accurate numbers. forgot to mention i'm at 4300ft. car trapped 105 in 1/4 mile...couldnt drop my 60ft from a 1.8. car has a 12.8 pass in it. Car is an evo 8 w/9 turbo, what do you think i should be pushing? i dont have a dyno near me
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 09:49 PM
  #120  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by lostsoulsevo
tscomp was tuning me, and i wanted accurate numbers. forgot to mention i'm at 4300ft. car trapped 105 in 1/4 mile...couldnt drop my 60ft from a 1.8. car has a 12.8 pass in it. Car is an evo 8 w/9 turbo, what do you think i should be pushing? i dont have a dyno near me
Ahh That makes more sense. Use 25.6 in the baro box to "correct" for that elevation.

Edit: Was that trap at elevation also?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:40 PM.