Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Finally got Dyno'd! 3076r

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 09:30 PM
  #106  
VajEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Evoryder
How long have you been tuning? I wouldn't recommend tuning your car. You even admit that you lack restraint. So from one extreme to the other lol extremely rich paid tune vs a potentially lean self tune.

I can't wait to read "update: able to run 12.5:1 on 93 oct thanks to new intercooler.

Eventhough we come off as rough and abrasive with our comments, we do so because we care. I think the level of ignorance you show to constructive critism is off the charts, however, if you're willing to open your eyes and listen we can help.

Fact:
your paid tune was crap
You have boost leaks or may have had during tuning
You don't listen to reason
Your car is under powered based on mods
Your too defensive
You probably should go to another tuner before messing with your car.
That's why most people say this "You get what you paid for".
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 04:30 AM
  #107  
emotart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, IL
Originally Posted by Evoryder
How long have you been tuning? I wouldn't recommend tuning your car. You even admit that you lack restraint. So from one extreme to the other lol extremely rich paid tune vs a potentially lean self tune.

I can't wait to read "update: able to run 12.5:1 on 93 oct thanks to new intercooler.

Eventhough we come off as rough and abrasive with our comments, we do so because we care. I think the level of ignorance you show to constructive critism is off the charts, however, if you're willing to open your eyes and listen we can help.

Fact:
your paid tune was crap
You have boost leaks or may have had during tuning
You don't listen to reason
Your car is under powered based on mods
Your too defensive
You probably should go to another tuner before messing with your car.
I've tuned many cars, I know that you can't run 12.5 on 93...

Your facts....
I'll leave #1 alone since we have beaten it like a dead horse.
#2 There were no boost leaks, car was BLT before and during tune
#3 You don't have the logs I have in front of you, I am making decisions based on looking at my logs and the maps in the tune
#4 I know the car is under powered for the mods I should be making about 25 hp more and now that the setup is flowing better, it will make that
#5 People on here don't read, they simply post, I have to defend things I've made explanations to and it gets old.
#6 I've tuned many cars, so I'm not worried about tuning this one.

I know everyone on here has my logs in front of them and has worked on my car, but I'm giving you guys the facts of looking at logs, instead of a computer screen.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 04:32 AM
  #108  
emotart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, IL
Originally Posted by VajEvo
Correct me if I'm wrong, Shoudn't you be making more? I'm got mine dyno tune on a dyno dynamics and making 413whp/338TQ. But my setup is ATP GT3071R w/ Tial 38mm WG.
Turbos don't make power, setups do. You can't just compare what turbo is on the car, you have to look at how that turbo works in the setup. I have fixed some choking points in my setup and the car will sit in that power range once I go through the tune.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 04:40 AM
  #109  
VajEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by emotart
Turbos don't make power, setups do. You can't just compare what turbo is on the car, you have to look at how that turbo works in the setup. I have fixed some choking points in my setup and the car will sit in that power range once I go through the tune.
I basely have the almost the same setup as yours.

BC 272 Cams
Wally
1000cc Injectors
TBE
ATP GT3071R
Custom licp
upper icp
eBay intercooler
speed density

that's pretty much it of mods I have on mine. I'm pretty sure you'll get up there with a nice tune. Turbo does make the power.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2012 | 07:41 PM
  #110  
emotart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, IL
I went out and did some tuning tonight and here is what I came away with...



I have to pull a little timing in the midrange, as there is a little bit of knock, but goes away fairly quick. I started seeing quite a few police cars, so I thought it would be better to continue this at a later date. Not bad, considering nearly everyone in this thread said I had no idea what I was doing and the IC wasn't the problem. The tune wasn't that bad, and all I had to do was touch up a few areas and run it a little lean. AFRs are at 11.0 most of the rev range and 10.8 by redline. I think power wise, it is not going to make much more, but I do want to have 0 knock through out the rev range so there is a little bit of work left.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 05:03 AM
  #111  
VajEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by emotart
I went out and did some tuning tonight and here is what I came away with...



I have to pull a little timing in the midrange, as there is a little bit of knock, but goes away fairly quick. I started seeing quite a few police cars, so I thought it would be better to continue this at a later date. Not bad, considering nearly everyone in this thread said I had no idea what I was doing and the IC wasn't the problem. The tune wasn't that bad, and all I had to do was touch up a few areas and run it a little lean. AFRs are at 11.0 most of the rev range and 10.8 by redline. I think power wise, it is not going to make much more, but I do want to have 0 knock through out the rev range so there is a little bit of work left.
This sounds about right. You should really get it on a dyno and see the actual number what the car will put out.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 05:36 AM
  #112  
todd6027's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 13
From: Ireland
Originally Posted by VajEvo
You should really get it on a dyno and see the actual number what the car will put out.
where would you find one of those
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 06:23 AM
  #113  
VajEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by todd6027
where would you find one of those
Locally?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 10:33 AM
  #114  
dastallion951's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 3
From: riverside, ca
Originally Posted by emotart
The before and after dyno I posted were the old IC and stock UICP vs the new IC and ETS UICP. Clearly, the new setup flows much better as I made 11whp more at 2psi less. The Mishimoto IC is a great stock replacement, but won't be used on cars making decent power. This is something I tried to tell people, but the refused to listen, so the Virtual Dyno was used to prove my point as I knew it would.

10.4 AFR will not make the car miss or foul out the plugs like crazy. If you look at a stock Evo map the target AFRs are in the 9s. So if 10.4 was to rich and cause problems a stock Evo would be a hot mess... I also said this was just to see how the parts would react to the current tune when I posted the new graphs. I will be tuning the car and will be somewhere around 11.0 AFRs when all is said and done, now that I don't have to worry about the IC heat soaking.
Actually let me clarify a few things, I know you think your knowledgable, but a 10.4 will foul plugs sooner, and that will be due to an overly rich mixture which will create excessive carbon buildup and blacken up your plugs thus misfires etc. Secondly target afrs and actual afrs are very different. If are cars ran consistently a 9.0:1 afr everytime one of us went wot we would be shooting black smoke all up on the car behind us like a diesel truck and basically gagging the driver if his windows are down. If your gonna tune your car, for your safety and safety of your pocketbook, do some research. Go onto the advanced thread where you can learn to tune and read dont post just read, read as much as you can. I have a feeling your possibly gonna run it overly rich too much, and wash the cylinder walls down with excess fuel which can create issues in itself. But on a good note im glad you got that ic off, I run there radiator, but after 300 hp a 3" is really limiting your hp potential unless your running e85.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 11:18 AM
  #115  
emotart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, IL
Originally Posted by VajEvo
This sounds about right. You should really get it on a dyno and see the actual number what the car will put out.
I under guessed on the weight and used a higher smoothing number to help deflate the numbers. I have no fear that this car will make those same numbers on a DynoJet in my area, but to me its not worth the $100 for 3 pulls. There is a noticable difference from last Saturday when I did the IC install and how it was pulling last night. The power is definitely there.

Originally Posted by dastallion951
Actually let me clarify a few things, I know you think your knowledgable, but a 10.4 will foul plugs sooner, and that will be due to an overly rich mixture which will create excessive carbon buildup and blacken up your plugs thus misfires etc. Secondly target afrs and actual afrs are very different. If are cars ran consistently a 9.0:1 afr everytime one of us went wot we would be shooting black smoke all up on the car behind us like a diesel truck and basically gagging the driver if his windows are down. If your gonna tune your car, for your safety and safety of your pocketbook, do some research. Go onto the advanced thread where you can learn to tune and read dont post just read, read as much as you can. I have a feeling your possibly gonna run it overly rich too much, and wash the cylinder walls down with excess fuel which can create issues in itself. But on a good note im glad you got that ic off, I run there radiator, but after 300 hp a 3" is really limiting your hp potential unless your running e85.
I know the difference between what AFR the car runs at and its target AFR, as well as how the car uses cells around which cell its reading to help calculate the AFR. This isn't the first car I've tuned and definitely not the first Evo I have tuned. You are correct in saying that a richer AFR will foul out plugs sooner, but you are exaggerating on how bad it truly is... After 2500 miles on the "to rich tune" the plugs didn't look bad at all. The only way you would see a problem is going WOT for long periods of time (such as laping around a road course or something like that), short spurts aren't going to kill you with a 10.4 AFR. Stock Evos are hitting AFRs much more rich than 10.4, so I will stick to my point that if 10.4 would kill my car, then a stock Evo won't have a standing chance. Hell, my old Caliber SRT4, was in the 9 AFR range stock and yes there was black smoke, but the car would have never blown up due to the factory tune and the plugs never came out looking horrible.

Clearly, you didn't read a couple posts up where I posted the new Virtual Dyno and said the AFRs are now at 11.0 for most the rev range and hit 10.8 up top. There is still a bit of fine tuning left and I do want to lean it out a bit more, but it is making a considerable amount of power more than it was a week or a month ago, so clearly this is a large step in the right direction.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 09:40 PM
  #116  
Howulikemyevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 293
Likes: 2
From: Orlando
i just did a street tune on my evo viii with a gt3076r with internal wastegate. I made 389hp. But my cel flash like crazy. We just tune it again. But still knock. Maybe u can tell me if ur car does the same. I have wisco 8.3:1. Manley rod,bc cam280, bc valve spring retainer, cop kit ignition,880 cc precision injector, fuel rail n fuel pressure regulator @ 42-43psi,injen piping, 3" intercooler, oil cooler, air density kit( take off the MAF), block off plate, eliminate egr,act clutch, 3" catback exhaust,3" intake,aem wideband n true boost, map 4bar. I think that all of it. Afr is at 11.5@5500rpm then lean to 12.5@7500rpm. But with that setup, it make my cel reads knocking sometimes on all the gears. Sometimes it knock on 1st n 2nd, other times it knock on 3rd n 4th. I have set my cam on the intake side 4 degree retard n my exhaust side 1 degree retard. So anyone can help me what am i doing wrong????? Pm me please
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 09:49 PM
  #117  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Howulikemyevo
i just did a street tune on my evo viii with a gt3076r with internal wastegate. I made 389hp. But my cel flash like crazy. We just tune it again. But still knock. Maybe u can tell me if ur car does the same. I have wisco 8.3:1. Manley rod,bc cam280, bc valve spring retainer, cop kit ignition,880 cc precision injector, fuel rail n fuel pressure regulator @ 42-43psi,injen piping, 3" intercooler, oil cooler, air density kit( take off the MAF), block off plate, eliminate egr,act clutch, 3" catback exhaust,3" intake,aem wideband n true boost, map 4bar. I think that all of it. Afr is at 11.5@5500rpm then lean to 12.5@7500rpm. But with that setup, it make my cel reads knocking sometimes on all the gears. Sometimes it knock on 1st n 2nd, other times it knock on 3rd n 4th. I have set my cam on the intake side 4 degree retard n my exhaust side 1 degree retard. So anyone can help me what am i doing wrong????? Pm me please
You should not lean the car out as RPM's increase, you should do the opposite. You might be running too lean.

Honestly, the more important thing would be your boost profile and even more importantly your timing curve. You might have too much timing at peak torque. It all depends on where you are getting knock.
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 03:15 PM
  #118  
careed's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Switch to e85 it will bump you 50 horse
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 03:39 PM
  #119  
emotart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, IL
Originally Posted by careed
Switch to e85 it will bump you 50 horse
I would have to get new injectors, rescale and what not to switch to E85 and to be completely honest, the car is a blast to drive right now. There are no more issues with heat soak thanks to the new IC! I know everyone in this thread said I was crazy and have no idea what I was doing, but today was 80*+ and they car had no issues after a few WOT pulls, the Mishimoto would heat soak after a couple gears with the 30R.
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 04:01 PM
  #120  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Nevermind.............everyone has said what I said and I see it's not going over well! haha

Last edited by David Buschur; May 3, 2012 at 04:05 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:22 AM.