Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Atp And Ams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 01:13 PM
  #46  
RnR Racing's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Eric, I think we should do that. One of your customers with your GT35R kit and one of our customers with the GT35R kit. Then anyone else that is interested in putting their kit to the test. ATP, Buschur, etc


Then we can POSSIBLY end the debate of which is the best kit.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 01:20 PM
  #47  
Dom's Avatar
Dom
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally Posted by RnR Racing
Eric, I think we should do that. One of your customers with your GT35R kit and one of our customers with the GT35R kit. Then anyone else that is interested in putting their kit to the test. ATP, Buschur, etc


Then we can POSSIBLY end the debate of which is the best kit.
I am sure with such a test the debate is beginning not ending.
Would be very interesting though
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 03:58 PM
  #48  
Az3ar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 1
From: none
Originally Posted by Dom
I am sure with such a test the debate is beginning not ending.
Would be very interesting though

I agree on that one
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #49  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
The trick is going to be getting two cars with the exact same modifications OTHER than the turbo kit. Otherwise your just going to get more people questioning the test rather than convincing.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 05:27 PM
  #50  
Quickshift's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: MD
Dont forget the same driver to
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 06:34 PM
  #51  
alex_alex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Az3ar
I will take my car to the track right when they open... on race gas I will brake in the 11's for sure.

here is my dyno chart with no cat on 91 gas. Race gas makes these turbos shine so I am looking at another 40WHP on race C16 and that will put me in the 390s WHP on dynojet.

oh let Alex tell me where is the lag??
1) stock turbos break into the 11's

2) stock turbos make an extra 40hp on race gas also.

3) AMS, Buschur's, Vishnu's turbo kits (NON- atp) make about 100 hp more on race gas. ATP = 40, hypothetically, at best.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 06:54 PM
  #52  
value's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
I would also like to see a HKS GT3037S kit included.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #53  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
Originally Posted by alex_alex
1) stock turbos break into the 11's

2) stock turbos make an extra 40hp on race gas also.

3) AMS, Buschur's, Vishnu's turbo kits (NON- atp) make about 100 hp more on race gas. ATP = 40, hypothetically, at best.
I would SEVERLY dispute that AMS, buschur's, vischnu's kits make 100hp gain going from pumpgas to racegas. I haven't seen any dyno or track proof to support anywhere near that large of a gain. 45-50hp maybe.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 09:08 PM
  #54  
3240's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by DSMotorsport
I would SEVERLY dispute that AMS, buschur's, vischnu's kits make 100hp gain going from pumpgas to racegas. I haven't seen any dyno or track proof to support anywhere near that large of a gain. 45-50hp maybe.
I have an Hks 3240 turbo kit on my car. On a 4 wheel dynojet on 91 octane I make about 480whp at 21psi. On C16 I make 590 whp at 29psi. Same conditions, same day.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 09:56 PM
  #55  
Derek888's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 1
From: Taipei
Originally Posted by 3240
I have an Hks 3240 turbo kit on my car. On a 4 wheel dynojet on 91 octane I make about 480whp at 21psi. On C16 I make 590 whp at 29psi. Same conditions, same day.
Those are good numbers. Correct me if Im wrong but HKS also use Garett turbos like ATP, AMS but instead they modifiy it internally which also makes it spool faster?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 10:25 PM
  #56  
Az3ar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 1
From: none
Originally Posted by alex_alex
1) stock turbos break into the 11's

2) stock turbos make an extra 40hp on race gas also.

3) AMS, Buschur's, Vishnu's turbo kits (NON- atp) make about 100 hp more on race gas. ATP = 40, hypothetically, at best.

Alex Alex you keep posting wrong information proving more and more how low your knowledge is about cars. My brother saw this thread today and could not stop laughing about you he told me why I am even wasting my time replying back to you. I really see my brother point and I know that talking to you is complete waste of time but I don’t see why you keep making numbers up and keep talking $hit. Here is another proof to you.

1- I can count on my fingers the stock turbos (not with the 10.5 hot side) that broke into the 11's , these cars where on the edge of disaster. Running the stock turbo 11 sec is not an easy task at all. It could cost more than buying a turbo kit.

2- Stock turbo makes 40whp extra with race gas with all supporting mods but after market turbos like the 3071, 3076, 3037 will make way more than that. It’s a known fact that big turbos shine with race gas (something you don’t know).

3- Back up what you are saying with dyno numbers and dyno sheets. I am sure that their kits will make 100WHP more with race gas with all supporting mods including cams, cam gears, FMIC and so on but in my case I said 40 because I don’t want to invest money in cams now. I can reach 370 on pump once my AMS intercooler is installed with water injection kit and I can reach the 400s with C16 (note: no cams are installed yet)

I am sorry Alex but when Garret introduced the 3071 they obviously know what they are doing and many customers are loving that turbo. The truth is that this turbo is new and more experience with it is required and so far it has served great.

Alex please come up with good argument before posting. You are boring to answer back too.


oh by the way your funny faces look funny to me
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 10:32 PM
  #57  
3240's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by Derek888
Those are good numbers. Correct me if Im wrong but HKS also use Garett turbos like ATP, AMS but instead they modifiy it internally which also makes it spool faster?
That's the basic idea.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 10:37 PM
  #58  
alex_alex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by DSMotorsport
I would SEVERLY dispute that AMS, buschur's, vischnu's kits make 100hp gain going from pumpgas to racegas. I haven't seen any dyno or track proof to support anywhere near that large of a gain. 45-50hp maybe.

IE EVO's dyno sheet from Vishnu

330 hp on the DD dyno on 91.

430 hp on the DD dyno on c16.

You can search for it, might still be on here, or you can call up the boys at Vishnu and ask.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 11:05 PM
  #59  
JustDSM's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne, WY
Originally Posted by 3240
I have an Hks 3240 turbo kit on my car. On a 4 wheel dynojet on 91 octane I make about 480whp at 21psi. On C16 I make 590 whp at 29psi. Same conditions, same day.
These numbers were obtained using a Dynojet with a correction factor of 1.25 or more... With elevation of 6200ft or so.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 11:25 PM
  #60  
3240's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by JustDSM
These numbers were obtained using a Dynojet with a correction factor of 1.25 or more... With elevation of 6200ft or so.
Correct. I've run an 11.3 @ 126mph at Bandimere which is at 6000ft. The HKS 3240 can boost to 35+psi at sea level. Up here it's out of its effeciency range after 29-30psi. That is why they use a 1.25 correction factor.

The car right now is getting a fairly radical upgrade done to it. We are attempting to put together a dual charger system. That's a supercharger with a large turbo such as a GT42 or HKS t51r. The design is being done right now and if all goes well the car will be finished by early spring. The cams have also been upgraded to piper racing cams and I've had a custom crank made by Pauter/RNR. The goal is 850+awhp and streetable. Should be intersting.

Last edited by 3240; Dec 11, 2004 at 11:29 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:33 PM.