Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Atp And Ams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 02:24 PM
  #76  
fimotorsports's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3
From: San Diego CA
Originally Posted by RnR Racing
Eric, I think we should do that. One of your customers with your GT35R kit and one of our customers with the GT35R kit. Then anyone else that is interested in putting their kit to the test. ATP, Buschur, etc


Then we can POSSIBLY end the debate of which is the best kit.
I'll donate my car for the test, that way you can have the same mods on the same car at the same track. Send me a PM if interested.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #77  
alex_alex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Az3ar
eh I am only 25 .. superz, please read my posts and you will realize that AMS is the winner for sure (I have said that). I am not defending ATP kit I am saying the truth. Alex (as you see in the begging of the thread) is spreading lies and rumors based on no facts. I had to chim in because his posts are un-true. I have seen and drove the AMS kit and the ATP so I am writing here from experience unlike Alex.
1) AMS is not just the winner, but the winner BY FAR. Their kit is not just 10-15 hp up on the ATP. Its MUCH much more than that.

2) You ARE defending the ATP, really, based on nothing. You make these "assertions" that are contrary to what the research and development of shops like AMS, VIshnu, and Buschur have realized, and keep pressing over and over and over that what you are saying is true.

3) What does "begging of the thread" mean?

4) If you are basing your experience on a "butt-dyno" driving of the two, you should probably understand that that is grossly inaccurate. First of all, after a certain amount of horsepower, having more or less power is REALLY hard to gauge just by "intuition." Second, many psychological factors play into your conlusion that the ATP is making only "a little" less power than the AMS. Its only natural i guess since you've invested a lot of money AND a long *** drive up to the bay area to get that turbo kit tuned, that you try and find any reason you can to convince yourself that the money was well spent. Cognitive dissonance is a mother.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #78  
MBGSTI's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Originally Posted by fre
Which dyno are you referring to when you say 330-350whp? My car feels at about 360-370whp on a dynojet, but I have stock cams. With cams I should be able to be around 400whp as I thought originally. Will get dynoed on Friday.
EVOtomig had his car dynoe'd @ Vishnu..

Smoggy had his car done there also and pulled about 330 hp on the DD dyno, then pulled 365 on a dynojet with no changes.

In Idaho, i hope u have better gasoline then here in Cali...
Ur better off runnin 91 with a little race gas mixxed in....maybe gonig up to 95 octane..as BIG turbo EVOs make LOWWW power on the gas we have around here.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 04:26 PM
  #79  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by DSMotorsport
I would SEVERLY dispute that AMS, buschur's, vischnu's kits make 100hp gain going from pumpgas to racegas. I haven't seen any dyno or track proof to support anywhere near that large of a gain. 45-50hp maybe.
obviously on different boost levels but on pump gas at one bar we did 400 whp. Then on C16 at 28psi we made 550 whp. I have dyno charts to prove it.

Eric
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 04:32 PM
  #80  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by Mark S
I have just done a AMS GT35R kit on a 2.227lt engine on 102ron fuel 636hp 568ftlb atf on a engine dyno at 2.4bar boost, Just started driving it on road at 2.500rpm touch the accel peddle .5bar there instant fantastic driveabiltly, just need to bed RPS clutch in so I can start testing it, The RPS carbon drives like a stock clutch even the Wife can drive the car, SO Far I am Very happy with both.

Mark
Mark, I am glad that you posted finally. I was hoping you would do so. We are very impressed with your results. Thanks for the kind words. Your compressor map info is on its way.

Oh and RNR we would be more then up for doing that.

Eric

Last edited by AutoMotoSports; Dec 13, 2004 at 04:46 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 04:56 PM
  #81  
RPSPP's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: OXNARD
Originally Posted by Mark S
I have just done a AMS GT35R kit on a 2.227lt engine on 102ron fuel 636hp 568ftlb atf on a engine dyno at 2.4bar boost, Just started driving it on road at 2.500rpm touch the accel peddle .5bar there instant fantastic driveabiltly, just need to bed RPS clutch in so I can start testing it, The RPS carbon drives like a stock clutch even the Wife can drive the car, SO Far I am Very happy with both.

Mark
Hi Mark,
Thank you for the RPS purchase, we know that your wife enjoys the clutch in the car but the real question is...can your Grandma drive it?
Cheers,
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 07:45 PM
  #82  
fre's Avatar
fre
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 1
From: Idaho
does evotomig have cams or no? Just curious.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 07:48 PM
  #83  
evotomig's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: N Cali
Originally Posted by fre
does evotomig have cams or no? Just curious.
272/272
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 07:52 PM
  #84  
fre's Avatar
fre
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 1
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by evotomig
272/272
Most interesting. I will be very curious to see what I make on the dyno now.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 07:53 PM
  #85  
evo542's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by HREVO
Lol anything to back it up though? How/why is AMS better than ATP other than it is more shiny? I know most people think it is better, but any reasons?
comes with it's own manifold which flows much better than stock one=>better spoool-up also comes with downpipe cone air filter etc.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 07:54 PM
  #86  
evotomig's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: N Cali
Originally Posted by fre
Most interesting. I will be very curious to see what I make on the dyno now.
Keep us posted.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 08:44 PM
  #87  
propellerhead's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: Agrestic
Originally Posted by Mark S
I have just done a AMS GT35R kit on a 2.227lt engine on 102ron fuel 636hp 568ftlb atf on a engine dyno at 2.4bar boost, Just started driving it on road at 2.500rpm touch the accel peddle .5bar there instant fantastic driveabiltly, just need to bed RPS clutch in so I can start testing it, The RPS carbon drives like a stock clutch even the Wife can drive the car, SO Far I am Very happy with both.

Mark
I'm glad you posted this too... can you give more specifics regarding your build? Hmm, 102 RON... that's about 96 octane (R+M/2) and you were pushing 2.5 bar (~35 psi) of boost? What compression ratio are you running? What engine management are you running?

Gee, I have a feeling the GT35R with a well built stroker is going to be the hot combo for the guys with a fat budget.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 01:53 AM
  #88  
CAR7's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Cool

Originally Posted by propellerhead
What engine management are you running?
Mark is the main agaent for Autronics in the UK, also one of the best all round Evo tuners that i know off.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 02:51 AM
  #89  
Dom's Avatar
Dom
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
obviously on different boost levels but on pump gas at one bar we did 400 whp. Then on C16 at 28psi we made 550 whp. I have dyno charts to prove it.

Eric
ok, but 28psi is almost 2 Bar. so the car gains 150whp by raising boost by 14,..psi

people should see that not the gas makes the hp but the higher boost that the

engine takes easier with the higher octane

probably the car would have close to 550whp even on pump at 28psi but would blow
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 03:20 AM
  #90  
tlohman's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
AMS is great
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:29 PM.