Super charger/ Turbo pics
Originally Posted by Evoisdream
i thought it was supposed to b running this month?
Originally Posted by 3240
It was. The tranny isn't going to be here until the first week of July, that is the hold up. We should be ready to go by the middle/end of July.
cool, please post up some vids or something of that thing running, especially the trick trans
Originally Posted by 3240
Alot will depend on the engine and head as the turbo, fuel, and cooling system will support well over 1000 HP.
One thing he did mention that caught my eye was when choosing a turbo you need to find out what the mass flow rate of the engine is WITH the supercharger, not the engine by itself. Mass flow rate is how much air the engine is capable of pumping. He said to find out in pounds instead of volume since compressing changes the volume of the air. He also mentioned when putting the turbo after the supercharger it would need a smaller compressor . The supercharger will compress the air first and the compressed air will take up less volume, hence the smaller compressor. Makes sense.
Did you account for this 3240? Do you know what the mass flow rate is for your engine?
Last edited by EVOONYOASS; Jun 30, 2005 at 10:21 PM.
Originally Posted by EVOONYOASS
I was reading in the June 2005 issue of Sport Compact an article on twin charging. The writer was talking about the benefits and potential hazards of this setup. He went into great detail on how each compliments the other if properly setup.
One thing he did mention that caught my eye was when choosing a turbo you need to find out what the mass flow rate of the engine is WITH the supercharger, not the engine by itself. Mass flow rate is how much air the engine is capable of pumping. He said to find out in pounds instead of volume since compressing changes the volume of the air. He also mentioned when putting the turbo after the supercharger it would need a smaller compressor . The supercharger will compress the air first and the compressed air will take up less volume, hence the smaller compressor. Makes sense.
Did you account for this 3240? Do you know what the mass flow rate is for your engine?
One thing he did mention that caught my eye was when choosing a turbo you need to find out what the mass flow rate of the engine is WITH the supercharger, not the engine by itself. Mass flow rate is how much air the engine is capable of pumping. He said to find out in pounds instead of volume since compressing changes the volume of the air. He also mentioned when putting the turbo after the supercharger it would need a smaller compressor . The supercharger will compress the air first and the compressed air will take up less volume, hence the smaller compressor. Makes sense.
Did you account for this 3240? Do you know what the mass flow rate is for your engine?
Total WW2 fighter plane technology, thin air twin charged piston engine from h3ll!
Originally Posted by EVOONYOASS
I was reading in the June 2005 issue of Sport Compact an article on twin charging. The writer was talking about the benefits and potential hazards of this setup. He went into great detail on how each compliments the other if properly setup.
One thing he did mention that caught my eye was when choosing a turbo you need to find out what the mass flow rate of the engine is WITH the supercharger, not the engine by itself. Mass flow rate is how much air the engine is capable of pumping. He said to find out in pounds instead of volume since compressing changes the volume of the air. He also mentioned when putting the turbo after the supercharger it would need a smaller compressor . The supercharger will compress the air first and the compressed air will take up less volume, hence the smaller compressor. Makes sense.
Did you account for this 3240? Do you know what the mass flow rate is for your engine?
One thing he did mention that caught my eye was when choosing a turbo you need to find out what the mass flow rate of the engine is WITH the supercharger, not the engine by itself. Mass flow rate is how much air the engine is capable of pumping. He said to find out in pounds instead of volume since compressing changes the volume of the air. He also mentioned when putting the turbo after the supercharger it would need a smaller compressor . The supercharger will compress the air first and the compressed air will take up less volume, hence the smaller compressor. Makes sense.
Did you account for this 3240? Do you know what the mass flow rate is for your engine?
hey 3240 i just started up a site for hosting pics to make it really simple and load fast its www.photo-garage.com just if u wanted to
looking amazing i cant wait to c it run!
looking amazing i cant wait to c it run!
The tranny just shipped from Australia and should arrive within the next couple of weeks. The car is running but the tuning is far from complete. We see just over 30 psi on that big turbo at a little over 5000rpms (about 500awhp) which is amazing. We have not been over 5500 rpms yet. It spools much quicker than the HKS 3240 thanks to the supercharger. It also already feels much more powerful then my last setup which was almost 600awhp. 800awhp with almost stock like spool????
The car is also very easy to drive. We're far enough along now where I can safely say that twin charging, when setup right, does work and works well. It's not going to require any high rpm launches since the supercharger will hit over 10psi at low revs. The car is on schedule to be done within 30 days.
The car is also very easy to drive. We're far enough along now where I can safely say that twin charging, when setup right, does work and works well. It's not going to require any high rpm launches since the supercharger will hit over 10psi at low revs. The car is on schedule to be done within 30 days.
Last edited by 3240; Jul 11, 2005 at 01:38 PM.



