Flashed White Rabbits: Please post your numbers Here!!
Originally Posted by BadazzCR
The run#24 was from the first tune I did, I tuned first a pumpgas map and then a racegas map. So it took 24 runs to get there.
The run #13 is from same car new folder so they start at 1 again. So again since I had allready tuned this car before it took less time to get her dialed in. Only a few tweaks here and there on the map. Run #13 being the last one of the day on the new tune.
Edit: the original 16g turbo was totally stock, NO 10.5 hotside. It was a factory 2003 Evo turbo
The run #13 is from same car new folder so they start at 1 again. So again since I had allready tuned this car before it took less time to get her dialed in. Only a few tweaks here and there on the map. Run #13 being the last one of the day on the new tune.
Edit: the original 16g turbo was totally stock, NO 10.5 hotside. It was a factory 2003 Evo turbo
Doug thanks for the post. Can you confirm that run 24 was the same car with a Stock turbo and run 13 is the WR. Are these from different folders? Also what is your impression? The torque lost is huge.
Is anyone familiar with Switzers dyno. Any baseline charts online (besides that one on the WR chart) Also food for thought the protos and original design might be as Switzer and Zeus report and growing pains in production
Is anyone familiar with Switzers dyno. Any baseline charts online (besides that one on the WR chart) Also food for thought the protos and original design might be as Switzer and Zeus report and growing pains in production
Originally Posted by David@Vishnu
Doug thanks for the post. Can you confirm that run 24 was the same car with a Stock turbo and run 13 is the WR. Are these from different folders? Also what is your impression? The torque lost is huge.
Is anyone familiar with Switzers turbo. Any baseline charts online (besides that one on the WR chart) Also food for thought the protos and original design might be as Switzer and Zeus report and growing pains in production
Is anyone familiar with Switzers turbo. Any baseline charts online (besides that one on the WR chart) Also food for thought the protos and original design might be as Switzer and Zeus report and growing pains in production
[QUOTE=BadazzCR]
Mod: 880cc injectors, AEM EMS, Intake pipe w/o maf, HKS 272cams, 3" turbo back exhaust, ceramic coated Ebay header, upper and lower intercooler piping.
Still on stock intake, intercooler, head un-ported, block
QUOTE]
Mod: 880cc injectors, AEM EMS, Intake pipe w/o maf, HKS 272cams, 3" turbo back exhaust, ceramic coated Ebay header, upper and lower intercooler piping.
Still on stock intake, intercooler, head un-ported, block
QUOTE]
Originally Posted by johnjonfenomeno
Doug was this a flash or AEM?
Still on stock intake, intercooler, head un-ported, block
Then someone needs to ask tym if we can borrow his map... Lets clear the air.. Tym can you loan us your map?
We need a third party test with the same setup and same map as the 370 pump gas pull tym did. Mark ask him for his map
We need a third party test with the same setup and same map as the 370 pump gas pull tym did. Mark ask him for his map
Last edited by johnjonfenomeno; Jul 15, 2005 at 09:34 PM.
Map? This has nothing to do with tuning, the turbo wouldn't hold boost up top. It would tapper just like the stocker. Hell when I get to the shop tomorrow I will post the log from the dyno pull with the white rabbit so you can see for yourself.
Originally Posted by johnjonfenomeno
Then someone needs to ask tym if we can borrow his map... Lets clear the air.. Tym can you loan us your map?
What Doug provided us with is total independent testing on a car that he tuned before (16G) and after (WR). There certainly isn't anything wrong with his tune. He has no agenda in posting his results, just education for the evoM community.
In my opinion, his post deserves major praise, because he just saved a lot of people $1500.
Originally Posted by Noize
Its not a mapping problem.
What Doug provided us with is total independent testing on a car that he tuned before (16G) and after (WR). There certainly isn't anything wrong with his tune. He has no agenda in posting his results, just education for the evoM community.
In my opinion, his post deserves major praise, because he just saved a lot of people $1500.
What Doug provided us with is total independent testing on a car that he tuned before (16G) and after (WR). There certainly isn't anything wrong with his tune. He has no agenda in posting his results, just education for the evoM community.
In my opinion, his post deserves major praise, because he just saved a lot of people $1500.
, but that doesn't help the ppl who already purchased and are hoping to see those results