Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.
View Poll Results: Which do you like?
AMS
24.98%
APS
1.97%
ARC
7.40%
AVO
0.20%
Buschur
23.30%
Ebay Special
3.06%
Garrett
1.58%
GReddy
3.75%
GRE Performance
0.20%
HKS
6.12%
Hyperflow
0.99%
Injen
1.28%
Kensei
0.30%
Nisei
17.87%
Peakboost
1.28%
Perrin
5.13%
Precision
0.69%
Pruven
0.30%
PWR
0.79%
SBR
0.30%
Slowboy
0.79%
Spearco
2.37%
SSautochrome
1.09%
Stock
3.85%
Turbonetics
0.39%
TurboXS
6.61%
Other
4.94%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 1013. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: FMIC - Front Mount Intercooler

Old Jan 5, 2006 | 03:52 PM
  #271  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by Ted B
Anyone who can make their way out of a paper bag quickly realizes that with this test, there were clearly two winners, no losers.

Anytime one can get the level of efficiency from an IC such that demonstrated by these two, he'll be going places - fast. We're talking maybe 1psi differential at the 30psi level at peak torque, and intake air temps near ambient at peak power while under heavy loading. What more could anyone want?

We can all quibble over minutia, but the fact remains that both ICs were so efficient that it would seem virtually impossible to do measurably better - at any price. At least we know what these two ICs (Nisei and Buschur Race) can do. As far as I am concerned, this test shows neither of these ICs have anything left to prove through power levels approaching at least 500bhp.

As far as I'm concerned, that's the meat and potatoes of it, and what remains to be argued is but breadcrumbs.
100% agree.

I would like to thank Burningmoney97 for starting this thread, and Nisei along with Buschur racing for both putting out great products.

Best thing about this thread to me was that when Dave Buschur saw comperable results from the Nisei FMIC and looked at the price difference between them it propted him to work out a deal to buy his cores in larger lots to get a better price on them, allowing him to offer his FMIC at a comperable price to the Niesi FMIC.

Thanks,

Keith

PS: In a situation like this the customer is the true winner
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 03:55 PM
  #272  
sasquatch's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Left Coast
Why is anyone saying that the pressure drop is the cause of sub-ambient temperatures? We do all realize that atmospheric pressure at sea level is 14.7 psi, right? A 1psi difference in anything is negligable and certainly not enough to drop temps 7deg below ambient.

Thanks for the testing alot Dave , and I'm sorry everone is having such a hard time with this.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #273  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by bbar
[size=2]Keith, I think you’re a little confused. I didn’t say, nor did I imply, that water will not boil if the ambient air parcels are saturated. I said that water will not evaporate if the ambient air parcels are saturated. It is a mistake to use the two interchangeably.
Yup, I was trying to be funny, and if I came off as being mean I apologize.
Originally Posted by bbar
There are some non-linear models that explain evaporation relative to relative humidity, but for our purposes this simplified equation should do.

E = 1 – RH
(If you’re interested I can also provide you with the derivation to get this equation, but I don’t want to bore you, nor anyone else reading this!) Anyway, E is the rate of evaporation and RH is relative humidity (in a decimal value...so 70% is .7) So if we have 100% relative humidity, then the equation will look like this:
E = 1 – 1
E = 0 So the rate of evaporation at 100% relative humidity will be zero. Consider as an example a pot of water. If you take a pot of water and put it outside when the ambient air parcels are saturated, then as long water in the pot doesn’t reach its boiling point, the water will not evaporate because the relative humidity is 100%. So since the relative humidity is 100%, there is no energy available to do the work of evaporation. However, if you could somehow heat up the water in the pot (putting a fire under the pot, for example) and heat it above 100C, then it will boil. The steam will not be absorbed by the ambient air parcels because the air parcels are already saturated. What happens is that the steam coming from the boiling pot of water just moves into the ambient air. This will result in a higher local pressure (because there’s more stuff in it now). The water vapor (steam) will eventually cool and since the relative humidity is 100%, it will fall back down (just like rain).
Your equations and explanation are correct if the water is at ambient temperature. If you take a pot of water at 190F out into a fog (100% relative humidity area) it will still steam... this is an observable fact that you can demonstrate to yourself on a foggy day. And here is why it works. in steaming, the pot of water heats the ambient air allowing it to accept more moisture. As soon as this very hot moist air cools down just a bit the water vapor will condens out into droplets. In fact, if you do this you can create a "localized" rain storm right near your pot of hot water
Originally Posted by bbar

I’m confused. Can you explain this a little bit more? The air doesn’t need to be dry to get cooler than ambient temps (if you have a sprayer it would defiantly help…but it’s not necessary). The air just needs to have some moisture in it (this is so the water molecules will stick to the fins for a second), and the air cannot be saturated (this is so the water on the fins can evaporate to someplace).
By "dry" I mean in a laymens terms dry. As in not saturated, (fog or rain).

In order to cool below ambient the water vapor in the air would have to "stick" to the intercooler fins and then evaporate. The only way for this to happen would be for the intercooler to already be below ambient in order for the water vapor to condense on the fins. This is not ever going to happen. The only way for it to work is for the water to already be in liquid form AND reletive humidity being below 100% (the lower the better). This only would happen with a sprayer of some kind.

Keith
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 07:26 PM
  #274  
ShaunSG's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Questions answered further down the page.

Last edited by ShaunSG; Jan 6, 2006 at 04:32 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 07:28 PM
  #275  
AMS's Avatar
AMS
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Originally Posted by Noize
I had an AMS for over a year on my TME turbo, cams, gears, engine mgmt, etc. I made no whp with it. I went back to the stock IC. It fits much better, makes the exact same power on the dyno, and spools 300rpm faster.

Stock or bust if you have a 16G!
Something was wrong then. We just put one an EVO and picked up 15whp with the IC and LICP, this was at roughly 290-300whp level. Possibly you had a boost leak?
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 07:37 PM
  #276  
ShaunSG's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Dave does not have the feedback loop turned on with the AEM boost control at this time, so it would not automaticly compensate for differences in pressure drop.

Keith
I'm thoroughly confused. Please excuse the stupid questions because I have never dealt with AEM and the last time I was involved with a turbo engine was quite a while ago.

How do you prevent boost runaway if there is no reading of pressure anywhere? Purely mechanically off wastegate spring pressure? If yes, then why is there mention of BC? Where does that BC read pressure reading from?
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 08:37 PM
  #277  
Smogrunner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 1
From: Inland Empire, CA
Originally Posted by AMS
Something was wrong then. We just put one an EVO and picked up 15whp with the IC and LICP, this was at roughly 290-300whp level. Possibly you had a boost leak?
Martin/AMS,
This is hardly scientific, but about a year and a half ago, I went from the stock 03 turbo and intercooler to the TME 6.5 and the AMS intercooler and LICP. I drove up to Vishnu to get retuned and my results so significant, that they could not really be explained by the TME turbo alone. I made a full 30 more whp on pump gas and 20 more hp on race gas. The torque gains were huge throughout the curve, but that I attributed to the 10.5 hotside. Everybody involved knew that your intercooler played a significant role in these results.

BTW, the reason I bought your intercooler in the first place was twofold: first, Shiv endorsed it (and, as everyone knows, he is a minimalist and is very slow to endorse aftermarket parts unless they really work). Then, while visiting Road Race Engineering, "Honda" Robert had one of your ICs and was very impressed with its build quality and design and he also recommended it.

The results? First time out to the track with the TME 6.5 and your intercooler:
11.9 at 115 on race gas
12.2 at 112 on 91 octane

to AMS
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 09:33 PM
  #278  
Smogrunner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 1
From: Inland Empire, CA
Nisei/Rob/Kevin,
First of all, I was VERY reluctant to let go of my AMS Intercooler in favor of the Nisei. But, I figured with a 35R and built 2.3 stroker motor, that your larger core would probably be advantageous, so I agreed to give it a try. Here are a couple of observations:
1. It fit perfect AND the front bumper beam fit too. Without that beam drivers risk a) having their valuable intercooler, piping, and turbo kits damaged with just a very low speed front collision, and b) sacrificing passenger safety at higher speeds.

2. Your upper and lower IC piping fit perfect and is show-quality. The smooth flat black is mean as hell looking. The lower piping uses an effective brace that connects to the OEM brace location. Unfortunately, I couldn't use it with my AMS 35R kit. However, either by luck or by design, your IC inlet matched up perfectly with the AMS LICP that came with their kit.

3. Hardware: Your use of super high quality formed silicone couplers AND expensive Dixon t-bolt clamps shows your commitment to preventing leaks, blown off couplers, and stripped clamps.

4. Customer service: I called Rob at MyEvoStore.com yesterday and he was very responsive to my few concerns (posted earlier) and has given me assurances that my concerns are already being addressed.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 10:13 PM
  #279  
Boosted GP's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: South Africa
Originally Posted by deadbeatrec
I am sorry but i dont get what u are saying? when did i say anything about 20psi droping to 15psi? please elaborate.

Ok,

Sorry if I confused you, but the way you worded your post about the pressure drop. this is how I read it:

if a vendor posts a pressure drop figure of a particular intercooler, they are posting how much more the drop is compared to standard, in other words saying that the std cooler is the base (zero point) and that the aftermarket has a drop of 1 psi, meaning it will have a pressure drop of 1 psi more than std.

That is how I read your post, sorry for the confusion as I was just trying to illustrate a point with the numbers I used.

Mike
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 01:24 AM
  #280  
bbar's Avatar
Newbie
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Newport Beach, CA
Originally Posted by Fourdoor
Your equations and explanation are correct if the water is at ambient temperature. If you take a pot of water at 190F out into a fog (100% relative humidity area) it will still steam... this is an observable fact that you can demonstrate to yourself on a foggy day. And here is why it works. in steaming, the pot of water heats the ambient air allowing it to accept more moisture. As soon as this very hot moist air cools down just a bit the water vapor will condens out into droplets. In fact, if you do this you can create a "localized" rain storm right near your pot of hot water .

Keith, you’re absolutely right. I was assuming that the air was saturated with the pot example. But yeah, if the pot is giving off atomic energy, then it will heat the local air, and in turn increase how much water it can hold. Then it wouldn’t be saturated anymore and the steam would evaporate. We’re on the same page!

Originally Posted by Fourdoor
In order to cool below ambient the water vapor in the air would have to "stick" to the intercooler fins and then evaporate. The only way for this to happen would be for the intercooler to already be below ambient in order for the water vapor to condense on the fins. This is not ever going to happen. The only way for it to work is for the water to already be in liquid form AND reletive humidity being below 100% (the lower the better). This only would happen with a sprayer of some kind.

This, too, is right on about water condensation. However, it’s still possible to cool the air below ambient without a sprayer. For example, say you’re swapping intercoolers. During the time it takes you to swap intercoolers though, the temps drop 10 degrees or so. Then moisture in the air will condense on, say, the intercooler itself. So when you first start driving around the core will see some type of wind. Evaporative cooling will now take place and lower the core below ambient. You will keep driving and the core will see more wind and since it is cooler than ambient, condensation will take place. From then on, it’s possible for the core to maintain below ambient temps the whole time as long as the relative humidity is between 1-99%.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 01:25 AM
  #281  
panem's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: Milpitas, CA
i'd go with nisei
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 01:43 AM
  #282  
Str8Ryda's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Wink

Well looks like I missed a lot of action again, alot has been said already. I think I'll just sum it up like this:

Originally Posted by myevostore.com
David,


You're always quick to share your thoughts on things but rarely ever offer concrete backing/data/facts about those thoughts. In addition, you're always quick to attack others who bring a different prospective which may not be the same as your ideology.


Rob
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
My guess is our standard or Deluxe will make atleast the same gains and our race will flat out stomp it.





Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Buschur Racing Race FMIC Nisei FMIC

Max HP 374 Max HP 369
Max TQ 372 Max TQ 371
Max Boost 31.07 psi Max Boost 30.36 psi

David Buschur
Well if thats getting stomped, then its really not much of a difference. I think someone already made the point of the dyno runs and how the same car will not repeat the same #'s as the previous run.

Originally Posted by atlvalet
David,

Wouldn't the fact that peak boost was almost 1 psi higher on your Race FMIC compared to the the Nisei affect horsepower?
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Yes, absolutely could mean more power from our core than the Nisei from the 1 extra psi.

David Buschur
Now, that is a truly interesting point.

Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Bottom line is the two intercoolers are close.

David Buschur
Originally Posted by myevostore.com
Nisei also felt that testing the standard Nisei vs. the Race FMIC would be un-matched since the Nisei Competition Series of products is in development, including the Nisei Competition intercooler which has been in development since early fall and is now in the testing phase.

The fact the standard Nisei IC did so well when challenged by the BR race FMIC only sustains what we've always said - that Nisei products are engineered to be "Race Ready" even if it's marketed for the street guy while still maintaining the best fitment and quality. We've always said the product will speak for itself and is the reason I've been so concise in my postings.
Rob

Well I guess this is just part one, I'm VERY interested to see what the Nisei Competition Intercooler will do.....

To be continued.



Last edited by Str8Ryda; Jan 6, 2006 at 01:49 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 02:18 AM
  #283  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by ShaunSG
I'm thoroughly confused. Please excuse the stupid questions because I have never dealt with AEM and the last time I was involved with a turbo engine was quite a while ago.

How do you prevent boost runaway if there is no reading of pressure anywhere? Purely mechanically off wastegate spring pressure? If yes, then why is there mention of BC? Where does that BC read pressure reading from?
Dave is in the process of setting up his AEM to control boost. When you first set up the boost with the AEM you manually input the wastegate solenoid duty cycle into the boost control chart. Then you do a run on the dyno to see what your resulting boost pressure was. With a good load bearing dyno it is pretty easy to dial in your settings. But this is just your "base map" with no compensation for weather conditions or changes in your system (like changing out the FMIC). After you have the base map set up you put in your feedback parameters in a seperate little map in the AEM program.

Hope this helps,

Keith
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 02:36 AM
  #284  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by bbar
This, too, is right on about water condensation. However, it’s still possible to cool the air below ambient without a sprayer. For example, say you’re swapping intercoolers. During the time it takes you to swap intercoolers though, the temps drop 10 degrees or so. Then moisture in the air will condense on, say, the intercooler itself. So when you first start driving around the core will see some type of wind. Evaporative cooling will now take place and lower the core below ambient. You will keep driving and the core will see more wind and since it is cooler than ambient, condensation will take place. From then on, it’s possible for the core to maintain below ambient temps the whole time as long as the relative humidity is between 1-99%.
The way you would get moisture on your intercooler would be if air temperature (and humidity) rise while your intercooler is still cold (say, from sitting overnight). Then the warm moist air hitting your cold FMIC will condense out a little moisture. I can go with that.

Now, in the process of condensing that moisture the FMIC temperature goes up. This is what a phase change from vapor to liquid is all about, a transfer of heat from the warm water vapor to the cold FMIC is what allows the water vapor to change phase from a vapor into it's liquid state. This transfer of heat engergy warms up the FMIC to the new ambient temperature.

Now you take your FMIC at ambient temperater covered in water droplets and go for a drive. For about the first min of driving (if you never hit boost at all and inlet temps into the FMIC stay low) you will have a minor amount of sub-cooling of the FMIC outlet air. After about a min of driving (at the extreme... probably a much shorter time) all that water vapor has evaporated.... this act of evaporation is what carrys the "extra" heat away from the FMIC which results in the sub-cooling in the first place.

If getting your intercooler cold and moist once meant it stayed cold and moist forever you would have invented a perpetual motion machine. Every machine is a heat engine of some kind, and if you discover one that violates the laws of conservation of energy you will be a very rich man (or assasinated by the oil companies).

Keith

Last edited by Fourdoor; Jan 6, 2006 at 02:40 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 02:55 AM
  #285  
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 5
From: Tucson
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
Nisei/Rob/Kevin,
First of all, I was VERY reluctant to let go of my AMS Intercooler in favor of the Nisei. But, I figured with a 35R and built 2.3 stroker motor, that your larger core would probably be advantageous, so I agreed to give it a try. Here are a couple of observations:
1. It fit perfect AND the front bumper beam fit too. Without that beam drivers risk a) having their valuable intercooler, piping, and turbo kits damaged with just a very low speed front collision, and b) sacrificing passenger safety at higher speeds.

2. Your upper and lower IC piping fit perfect and is show-quality. The smooth flat black is mean as hell looking. The lower piping uses an effective brace that connects to the OEM brace location. Unfortunately, I couldn't use it with my AMS 35R kit. However, either by luck or by design, your IC inlet matched up perfectly with the AMS LICP that came with their kit.

3. Hardware: Your use of super high quality formed silicone couplers AND expensive Dixon t-bolt clamps shows your commitment to preventing leaks, blown off couplers, and stripped clamps.

4. Customer service: I called Rob at MyEvoStore.com yesterday and he was very responsive to my few concerns (posted earlier) and has given me assurances that my concerns are already being addressed.
So ..what have you found other than safety for the passengers in a high speed collision, fittment and customer service? What about the performance? was it better?, worst?any dyno? any testing on the roads to see boost?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:13 AM.