Is it possible???
Originally posted by Claudius
My lambda values go from 12.3:1 between 3000 rpm and 6000 rpm to 11.6:1 from 6000 rpm to 7000 rpm to 10.6:1 over 7000 rpm. EGT around 950°C (but I have 2.10 bar boost at 4000 rpm!
)
My lambda values go from 12.3:1 between 3000 rpm and 6000 rpm to 11.6:1 from 6000 rpm to 7000 rpm to 10.6:1 over 7000 rpm. EGT around 950°C (but I have 2.10 bar boost at 4000 rpm!
)
As for the airflow fuel cut, it won't be based strictly on MAF Hz reading. As I think someone else posted ealier, it will factor in air temps and baro pressure too, but it also includes RPM... It's basically an "air mass per rev" comparison. Which is why the fuel cut might not happen one day when it's 60F out, but might the next when it's 30F. More mass requires more fuel which is what the real limit is based on...the fuel requirements for the given airflow. If the fuel requirements exceed the capacity of the factory fuel system, the ECU cuts the motor.
Thomas Dorris
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by twdorris
Damn that sounds like a fun ride. All the right numbers in all the right spots. The EGT is a bit higher than I might have expected. Is that sustainable on a road course or is that a setup for a pure power pull?
Damn that sounds like a fun ride. All the right numbers in all the right spots. The EGT is a bit higher than I might have expected. Is that sustainable on a road course or is that a setup for a pure power pull?

EGT was pretty stable when setting the ECU with the wideband O2 sensor connected (on the road) but went higher on the dyno with that tiny fan
Originally posted by twdorris
As for the airflow fuel cut, it won't be based strictly on MAF Hz reading. As I think someone else posted ealier, it will factor in air temps and baro pressure too
As for the airflow fuel cut, it won't be based strictly on MAF Hz reading. As I think someone else posted ealier, it will factor in air temps and baro pressure too

Originally posted by twdorris
If the fuel requirements exceed the capacity of the factory fuel system, the ECU cuts the motor.
If the fuel requirements exceed the capacity of the factory fuel system, the ECU cuts the motor.
Originally posted by Claudius
Yes, but there's a lot of safety margin in that program. The stock fuel pump can supply fuel for about 22 PSI held boost IIRC, especially if you bridge that relay to increase the voltage.
Yes, but there's a lot of safety margin in that program. The stock fuel pump can supply fuel for about 22 PSI held boost IIRC, especially if you bridge that relay to increase the voltage.
Thoma s Dorris
Last edited by twdorris; Apr 8, 2003 at 05:31 PM.
Yes you did
... But I have never seen more than 1900 Hz on my PowerFC...
... But I have never seen more than 1900 Hz on my PowerFC...
You mean it "drives you crazy"?
I understand you very well!
Where are you from?
I understand you very well!
Where are you from?Now I live in Diamond bar, CA.
I've doing ECU tune in KOREA.
Well, I think Mitsubishi programmed a fuel cut into the ECU when Karman frequency =1700 Hz and temp = 18 or 20°C at 1000 mmHg barometric pressure.
for Boost control,
First value is AFS's OUT put
but in USDM EVO8 ECU not set AFS freq.
It's value is like EVO5 RS (6350Hz)
Yes, that what I use the SARD ANALYZER for 
You can see it here (in Kanji I think): http://gooparts.com/special/spe8/08.html

You can see it here (in Kanji I think): http://gooparts.com/special/spe8/08.html
Yes, it's higher at idle: 6 bars.
more big size injector.
Last edited by Drivemecrazy; Apr 9, 2003 at 01:34 AM.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanks for all the info, Drivemecrazy 
I plan on getting 720cc/min injectors to get below 80% duty cycle. Maybe SARD injectors with the SARD fuel rail? (this is for an Evo 6) What would you suggest? I was also thinking maybe a bigger MAF (RB26 maybe?). Thanks

I plan on getting 720cc/min injectors to get below 80% duty cycle. Maybe SARD injectors with the SARD fuel rail? (this is for an Evo 6) What would you suggest? I was also thinking maybe a bigger MAF (RB26 maybe?). Thanks
Originally posted by Claudius
Thanks for all the info, Drivemecrazy
I plan on getting 720cc/min injectors to get below 80% duty cycle. Maybe SARD injectors with the SARD fuel rail? (this is for an Evo 6) What would you suggest? I was also thinking maybe a bigger MAF (RB26 maybe?). Thanks
Thanks for all the info, Drivemecrazy

I plan on getting 720cc/min injectors to get below 80% duty cycle. Maybe SARD injectors with the SARD fuel rail? (this is for an Evo 6) What would you suggest? I was also thinking maybe a bigger MAF (RB26 maybe?). Thanks
In my experience. 75~80% duty is safety and max for
Engine...
See atached image. I don't know exactly.
May be your injector looks like that.
That type injector still small size than EVO's stock.
May be HKS ready to sell 820cc in japan.
Other way is change to top feed type injector,
Fuel rail. but this mod. need change injector connector too.
About MAF... as far as I know.
no bigger type for EVO, EVO's AFS is Kalmann vortex type.
But most Japanese car's AFS is Hot film or Hot wire.
RB26's type to Hot wire,
If you use HKS F-Con V Pro, you can remove stock AFS.
Last edited by Drivemecrazy; Apr 9, 2003 at 12:59 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nzevo8
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
5
Jan 14, 2016 04:30 AM
Derekj03
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
17
Jul 21, 2005 07:28 PM




