Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Atp Kit/pruven Dyno Results!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #121  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
as long as we are updating this old *** thread



might as well have the newest dynosheet.

93 sunoco gas
25psi
aquamist 100% meth
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #122  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Wow that is laggy.

Scorke
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #123  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by deadbeatrec
hater!
Give me another good reason why the cheapest, most accessible turbokit wouldn't be used by more people?

This forum is filled with all kinds of people/owners can you give me a better guess as to why we havent seen them on here? The other one could be because the results were that dismal?

Scorke
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 02:02 PM
  #124  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
I guess he didnt go to pruven performance for his tune this time, I wonder why
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #125  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
I don't get why your running only 25PSI with METH on a 35R (30R?) Either way 25 is way too low and recent studies have show a properly set up 35R can run 25PSI on pump alone. Why not run 30PSI?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #126  
crazyitr's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
The turbo's housing adapts to the stock manifold. The increase in back pressure causes heat to accumulate near the head. As the exhaust gases back up in the manifold they create contamination in the cylinder head This contamination reduces the knock threshold of the motor. You have to run less timing and less boost. That is why tubular headers that remove the gases away from the motor before they collect them can run more boost and timing on the same given fuel. if this were not the case, everyone would be running log or cast manifolds.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 04:53 AM
  #127  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
i have a tubular manifold first off. Full race

second off its a 3037s/3076r not a 35r. i didnt want to go above 27psi or 480whp which ever came fist due to the stock bottom end.

thridly, laggy? i hit full boost by 4600 or so. its not as laggy as it appears.

and as for u shark- u are a tool with too much money. take ur assinine comments elsewhere.

Last edited by deadbeatrec; Nov 20, 2007 at 04:57 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 04:57 AM
  #128  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
u know what scorke, no one can tell u otherwise. you are always right, always buy/make the right parts and rarely give anyone/anything else credit where its deserved. anytime u say anything to anyone on this forum, it has to be taking with a grain of salt because if not like exactly like yours, something is wrong and the product sucks.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 06:54 AM
  #129  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by deadbeatrec
u know what scorke, no one can tell u otherwise. you are always right, always buy/make the right parts and rarely give anyone/anything else credit where its deserved. anytime u say anything to anyone on this forum, it has to be taking with a grain of salt because if not like exactly like yours, something is wrong and the product sucks.
Thats just simply untrue.

It is impossible to make everything yourself (or at least it was for me haha). I give credit to anybody/everybody that puts together a well sorted car. There is nobody on this forum that has a setup exactly like mine, and I rarely bash vendors products, only a couple who seem to really suck.

Scorke
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 07:38 AM
  #130  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
Originally Posted by deadbeatrec
i have a tubular manifold first off. Full race

second off its a 3037s/3076r not a 35r. i didnt want to go above 27psi or 480whp which ever came fist due to the stock bottom end.

thridly, laggy? i hit full boost by 4600 or so. its not as laggy as it appears.

and as for u shark- u are a tool with too much money. take ur assinine comments elsewhere.
hahahahah, OK go Pruven just wanted to know what happend you didn't go back to you peeps
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 09:36 AM
  #131  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Sharkbite2000
hahahahah, OK go Pruven just wanted to know what happend you didn't go back to you peeps
reason is because i met the owner of ICS at waterfest and he told me to stop by.

Pruven are awesome guys, have never done me or anyone i have sent there wrong. and in fact always give me awesome deals on parts and installs.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 09:39 AM
  #132  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by scorke
Thats just simply untrue.

It is impossible to make everything yourself (or at least it was for me haha). I give credit to anybody/everybody that puts together a well sorted car. There is nobody on this forum that has a setup exactly like mine, and I rarely bash vendors products, only a couple who seem to really suck.

Scorke
ok keep lieing to yourself. u know it and i know it. nothing will ever be good enough for u, unless its yours.

i have read countless number of times u bashing or saying bad things about other top notch vendors, so i really dont know what to tell u. u and many others feel as though ATP is crap, well i disagree.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 09:45 AM
  #133  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Deadbeat, there is no reason to make 27psi or 480whp your cutoff due to the stock bottom end. That's not even close to what it can handle safely. You say full boost by 4600, but peak torque isn't until 5100. What matters is what we see on the dynosheet, because that's our frame of reference.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 09:53 AM
  #134  
staatz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 1
From: Danbury, CT
Personally, everyone bashes the kit, but it's still making more power than most other evos in the area and on this board. Most people just have simple bolt ons and for the price/power output it justifies the cost.

OT - I'm a bodybuilder too =D hah.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #135  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Deadbeat, there is no reason to make 27psi or 480whp your cutoff due to the stock bottom end. That's not even close to what it can handle safely. You say full boost by 4600, but peak torque isn't until 5100. What matters is what we see on the dynosheet, because that's our frame of reference.
well u have to also take into account that the dyno is a dynojet and isnt load bearing. on the road cars act differently. all i can do is tell u what i see while im driving. full boost def hits before 5100 rpms when driving on the streets.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:17 PM.