Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Another new PUMP gas record, thanks Driven Innovations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #616  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
I fully intend on finding the limits of the stock ECU/mas, it's just a matter of time.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 09:32 AM
  #617  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Good point Ted it does seem a bit intimidating hearing about patches and scaling and maf conversion stuff. Converse of your point, the only reason I'd like to move to the stock ECU is it's knock control. Which is sort of what drives some of my questions in this thread. Is the lack of knock control in the ECU I use a substantive reason to be jealous of other ECU's? I love Autronic but wish it had knock control.

I went so far as to try the KnockBlock from Link, run into a analog input on the Autronic, and see what I came up with. This was with the KnockBlock connected to the stock knock sensor. I found it did not work well at all... as RPM rise so did noise. Incuced det, and the log seemed to not identify anything abnormal. I think the the KnockBlock was a lot less sophisticated than I thought it would be.

I'd like to see someone come up with a way to use the Stock ECU's knock control system in a small easy to install device with an analog output which can feed into a standalone.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #618  
zbomb's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 1
From: Mass
Originally Posted by crcain
It's interesting... there is a lot of faith out there in both AEM's and the stock ECU's knock control. In fact I think many tuners solely rely on these systems to tune a car. IE not use det cans and their ears. Just logs and knock counts.

So... if a tuner is comfortable enough to trust these systems to tune with... why not make the tune quite aggressive and if their is a bad tank of gas, who cares as the knock control system will pick it up just fine.
Don't you think that the combination of tuning using KS inputs as well as not going overly aggresive is what helps to keep so many motors together?

I am faced with the same dillemma as many who choose to go the standalone route in the end of the day...Big turbo, huge airflow, big injectors. Do I think to go AEM and save the headache of trying to get everything right on the stock ECU? Not at the moment, there are too many developments happening with the stock hardware at a fast rate for me to not follow closely and try the new methods that are being put fourth. In the end I think the faith in the stock KS as well as how knock is interpreted by the AEM and others is based on the success posted by those using these devices ( motors still in one piece ).

Do we see every failure....Obviously not so I guess it comes down to an individual's prefference. Another thing to keep in mind is that a large portion of street cars need to go through OBD2 testing, standalones won't get me through that easy enough for me to justify getting one at the moment.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #619  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Removed because it was Irrelevant to this thread.

Last edited by MalibuJack; Mar 1, 2008 at 06:34 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 10:12 AM
  #620  
Mark S's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: England
There is also a misconception that tunes have to have ZERO knock to be good tunes, zero knock means its a conservative tune, and safe, but under varying loads and conditions, knock is inevitable. Its the job of the ECU to properly handle these occasional knock events. This is DIFFERENT than running a tune that knocks severely enough to always rely on the knock sensor to save someone from a bad tune.

This is completely wrong, When you run in to knock you have to pull more timing out than a no knock tune, when it starts to knock unless you pull out enough to stop it the knock will only get worse unit it blows up,
To live on the knock sensor will shorten engine live as it will nibble away at the piston egde/top ring/head gasket, This is fine with a lifed race engine but not correct with a road engine,
A correctly biult/spec'd/mapped engine will only wear out over a extended period of time it will not blow up.

Mark
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 10:23 AM
  #621  
DTM's Avatar
DTM
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Dulles, VA 20166
Originally Posted by Mark S
There is also a misconception that tunes have to have ZERO knock to be good tunes, zero knock means its a conservative tune, and safe, but under varying loads and conditions, knock is inevitable. Its the job of the ECU to properly handle these occasional knock events. This is DIFFERENT than running a tune that knocks severely enough to always rely on the knock sensor to save someone from a bad tune.

This is completely wrong, When you run in to knock you have to pull more timing out than a no knock tune, when it starts to knock unless you pull out enough to stop it the knock will only get worse unit it blows up,
To live on the knock sensor will shorten engine live as it will nibble away at the piston egde/top ring/head gasket, This is fine with a lifed race engine but not correct with a road engine,
A correctly biult/spec'd/mapped engine will only wear out over a extended period of time it will not blow up.

Mark
DING DING DING We have a winner
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #622  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
obviously engines can survive for very long periods of time with extremely high knock counts...I can't count how many 91 octane modded cars came to me with 20 counts of knock and apparently had been that way for years.

True tuning for 0 counts of knock is likely going to be a conservative tune but I choose to tune for little to no knock to make the car consistent between runs also. If you're knocking in each run the ecu is pulling timing for you so you might as well pull the timing to keep that from happening and have a more consistent car.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 03:00 PM
  #623  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Removed because it was Irrelevant to this thread.

I wanted to remove my clutter to keep the thread on-topic.

Last edited by MalibuJack; Mar 1, 2008 at 06:35 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #624  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
ding ding ding..............any chance of getting this topic remotely close to back on topic.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 08:37 PM
  #625  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
U2SLO get a friend with a nice camera and go out during sunset and take some pics of this beast. Then do a nice in car video of you going through some twisties.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 09:08 PM
  #626  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
Originally Posted by crcain
I always thought the term "knock" when used normally meant detonation. AFAIK there is only detonation and pre-ignition correct?
Sorry, should have read "noise" instead of "knock."
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 09:13 PM
  #627  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Mellon
obviously engines can survive for very long periods of time with extremely high knock counts...I can't count how many 91 octane modded cars came to me with 20 counts of knock and apparently had been that way for years.

.
The reason why 91 octane cars last with high knock counts is becuase the ecu is pulling down the timing to a safe level.

Its all in how you set up the ecu.

I have been tuning on 90 octane and 91 octane all over the west and its often very difficult to get those cars to run properly.

Al
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 09:14 PM
  #628  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
ding ding ding..............any chance of getting this topic remotely close to back on topic.
ding ding ding - it seems the arm chair tuners have invavded with talk of fast stock ecus

Lets get back to the matter of Master Buschur rasing the bar on pump gas power !
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #629  
Wicked E's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Edited: Not worth the hassle...

Last edited by Wicked E; Mar 1, 2008 at 12:11 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2008 | 12:07 AM
  #630  
EvoRecordSetter's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by crcain
DB has said the HTA mod does nothing for peak horsepower.
sorry but your wrong.

Originally Posted by AMS
Why would you like the idea of pulling the WG off the collector more than the turbine housing out of curiosity. The 35HTA from Forced Performance does work well, it's an option that we can offer also. I've seen about 25whp gain over a standard 35R with it, but it still won't make the peak power a 37R will. The FP 35HTA does spool very nicely though.
http://store.forcedperformance.net/m..._Code=Turbo-FP

Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:00 AM.