Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Evo Turbo Information

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2003, 11:15 AM
  #46  
Newbie
 
DragonEvoVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vancouver, WA. (for now)
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wrong thread

Originally posted by ShapeGSX


Chances are that he just revved the turbo too high, and/or the turbo was just abused.

I've seen 14B's (standard TD05H - inconnel) do the same thing. In fact, the one I saw shot out the car's tailpipe and was sitting on the track after his run.


this is the one i was laughing at
Old Dec 9, 2003, 07:26 PM
  #47  
Newbie
 
YellowEvo8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey guys, i was wondering what the max psi of the evo 8 turbo is
Old Dec 9, 2003, 08:02 PM
  #48  
Evolved Member
 
ShapeGSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am running 26psi out of my Evo III turbo, which supposedly has the same compressor as the 8. I can't be sure, though.
Old Dec 12, 2003, 09:21 PM
  #49  
Newbie
 
chiraoka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lima - Peru
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ShapeGSX what is the weight of your 97 GSX ?

Carlos H.
Old Dec 13, 2003, 04:40 AM
  #50  
Evolved Member
 
ShapeGSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
3150lbs with the spare removed. That is how I race it.
Old Dec 13, 2003, 09:27 AM
  #51  
Newbie
 
chiraoka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lima - Peru
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that is about 1,428.82 kgs. ..... EVO 5 RS and EVO 6 RS (both came with a 16g6 and a 10.5T hotside) only weight 2,755.77 lbs. guess that is why they can get easily into the high 11s territory with minor mods.

Carlos H.
Old Dec 13, 2003, 12:00 PM
  #52  
Evolved Member
 
alleggerita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 638
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
BTW, anybody know why went to the counterclockwise turbo on the version 4? Was it for gasflow, packaging???
Old Dec 13, 2003, 01:28 PM
  #53  
Evolved Member
 
ShapeGSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
With the engine on the other side of the engine bay, the exhaust gasses just want to flow in that direction. Plus it would have meant a big change to the engine bay if the turbo compressor were pointed at the other side.
Old Dec 15, 2003, 10:44 PM
  #54  
Evolving Member
 
ItsStockOfficer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
With the engine on the other side of the engine bay, the exhaust gasses just want to flow in that direction.
I would like to hear this...explain please?
Old Dec 16, 2003, 04:26 AM
  #55  
Evolved Member
 
ShapeGSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think that the other reason I gave was probably the major factor.

However, take a look at this picture:


When the gasses hit the exhaust manifold, they have to make a 90 degree turn to enter the turbo. Hopefully this is a gradual turn in the manifold. You will notice in the picture that the exhaust will immediately start to turn more, in the same direction as the 90 degree turn (back towards the engine) as it enters the snail of the exhaust housing.

If they instead mounted a normal rotation turbo on the car, the exhaust would have to make a turn in the other direction as it enters the snail. This would probably decrease the efficiency of the system. I think that with all the tiny tweaks that Mitsu has done to the Evo's 16G turbo over the years, that this probably was a small part of their consideration.
Old Dec 16, 2003, 05:59 AM
  #56  
Evolved Member
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by chiraoka
that is about 1,428.82 kgs. ..... EVO 5 RS and EVO 6 RS (both came with a 16g6 and a 10.5T hotside) only weight 2,755.77 lbs. guess that is why they can get easily into the high 11s territory with minor mods.

Carlos H.

The RS’s where designed for competition use and have basic interiors and less sound deadening, that’s why they are lighter. This reduction of equipment leads to their slightly lower price as much of the equipment in the GSR’s are not wanted when you go rallying!
Old Dec 16, 2003, 07:45 AM
  #57  
Newbie
 
chiraoka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lima - Peru
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and the RS versions also came without the AYC rear diff , with the larger RS rear diff and a LSD, with bigger driveshafts, etc. .....

Carlos H.
Old Dec 28, 2003, 01:59 AM
  #58  
Evolving Member
 
ItsStockOfficer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
I think that the other reason I gave was probably the major factor.

However, take a look at this picture:


When the gasses hit the exhaust manifold, they have to make a 90 degree turn to enter the turbo. Hopefully this is a gradual turn in the manifold. You will notice in the picture that the exhaust will immediately start to turn more, in the same direction as the 90 degree turn (back towards the engine) as it enters the snail of the exhaust housing.

If they instead mounted a normal rotation turbo on the car, the exhaust would have to make a turn in the other direction as it enters the snail. This would probably decrease the efficiency of the system. I think that with all the tiny tweaks that Mitsu has done to the Evo's 16G turbo over the years, that this probably was a small part of their consideration.
No...either way the exhaust gases would be going towards the block because if they mounted a normal rotation housing it would point towards the passenger side, or forse a huge heat shiled to cover the turbo that would probably hit the radiator....and the manifold turns are hardly gradual at all anyways.
Old Jan 6, 2004, 03:46 PM
  #59  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (58)
 
mifesto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i always believed the U.S. evo 8 had titanium turbos
Old Jan 26, 2004, 12:09 AM
  #60  
Newbie
 
-ND4SPD-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Broomfield Co.
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

What is the max horsepower that both the
TD05RA-15GK2-10.5T (GSR) / E6)
TD05HR-16G6-9.8T (GSR / USDM E8)
can support?


Quick Reply: Evo Turbo Information



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:02 PM.