Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Forced Performance Evo Red Turbo data

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #316  
GarretEvo8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Australia, Perth
look forward to seeing the results.
this turbo is sounding very good what are the wait times from buschur and FP?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #317  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
^^that'll be interesting Razorlab

green vs red
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 09:22 PM
  #318  
wizzo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 14
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally Posted by razorlab
We have a customer that is upgrading to a FPred from a FPgreen here pretty soon, probably a couple weeks or whenever FP sends him the turbo.

It's not a 8, it's a 9 but it's a normal 9.

cams/tbe/intake/fmic/ecu-boost/injectors/fp
Thats what I want to know
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 09:25 PM
  #319  
DJ Brett B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: salt lake city
Originally Posted by razorlab
We have a customer that is upgrading to a FPred from a FPgreen here pretty soon, probably a couple weeks or whenever FP sends him the turbo.

It's not a 8, it's a 9 but it's a normal 9.

cams/tbe/intake/fmic/ecu-boost/injectors/fp
+1 on wanting to hear how the red compares- this is the same setup I ill be running with it (or green depending...) only I will be running 65mm TB/ported intake/exhaust mani's also....
I would like to see a green vs. red on stock bottom end and head (except for cams) with all the bolt-ons at 91-93 octane and also on meth at higher (26-30psi)... Seems like this is the major comparison everybody is waiting for
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 03:50 AM
  #320  
dsmfan95's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 1
From: NC
Originally Posted by razorlab
We have a customer that is upgrading to a FPred from a FPgreen here pretty soon, probably a couple weeks or whenever FP sends him the turbo.

It's not a 8, it's a 9 but it's a normal 9.

cams/tbe/intake/fmic/ecu-boost/injectors/fp
I'm interested in seeing the results.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 08:07 AM
  #321  
jbrown's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
Originally Posted by 4kinboost
You again huh?

I guess you didn't learn anything since our last debate?

Nice example of a 'maxed-out' 3076r... Ecutek reflash and 31psi max boost.
*cough*douche*cough*bag*cough*

I can see that you choose to interpret what I say in your own twisted logic, so let me clarify since you seem to be missing something. What I meant was that particular car had a 3076 that maxed out at 500whp on that particular build with the parts he chose and the tuning decisions he made. I did NOT say that all 3076s max out at 500whp period.

I even invited you to show some examples. Come on big boy, let's see a few 3076s that "crush" the red over 7krpm.

Our last debate concluded with you looking like an idiot as well, so I'm not sure what you mean. But please keep that in PM or start a new thread (if you require public humiliation).
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 08:18 AM
  #322  
Liqquid's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 4
From: Sag-Nasty, MI
From this one chart, it looks like those two turbos are right in the same power range, I'll let you two decide on the "crushing"

Last edited by Liqquid; Jul 12, 2008 at 08:21 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 08:38 AM
  #323  
jbrown's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
Originally Posted by Liqquid
From this one chart, it looks like those two turbos are right in the same power range, I'll let you two decide on the "crushing"
My point exactly, in fact they use almost mirror-imaged compressor wheels, so unless one had a completely botched turbine (which they don't), neither is going to "crush" the other at any rpm.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 11:08 AM
  #324  
4kinboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
From: long island,ny
Originally Posted by jbrown
*cough*douche*cough*bag*cough*

I can see that you choose to interpret what I say in your own twisted logic, so let me clarify since you seem to be missing something. What I meant was that particular car had a 3076 that maxed out at 500whp on that particular build with the parts he chose and the tuning decisions he made. I did NOT say that all 3076s max out at 500whp period.

I even invited you to show some examples. Come on big boy, let's see a few 3076s that "crush" the red over 7krpm.

Our last debate concluded with you looking like an idiot as well, so I'm not sure what you mean. But please keep that in PM or start a new thread (if you require public humiliation).

Hey jacka$$. I'm done educating you since you just can't seem to 'agree to disagree' with-out turning the discussion into a slugfest. As I recall and others can as well as long as they can read your last posts to me consisted of retarded logic of increased manni voume 'never ever' being good for turbo applications-- You got shut down on that logic pretty quickly. Now you are here telling the world that 2 turbo's with the same compressor wheels will respond the same above 7k-- even IF one turbo has a larger compressor housing AND is running an equal length exhaust manni AND is running larger a/r turbine.

Are you 4kin dense or something? Did you go to school for any period of time and learn anything? Before you put your foot in your mouth I suggest that you use SEARCH-- it's your friend.

Since you haven't gotten past 360awhp yet, please take the back seat when adults are speaking. You are much better off.

Didn't you learn anything from my last link to Full race's research. The same turbo picked up 63hp from nothing more than an exhaust manifold/tune. The highlight of the RED is that it's a bolt-on application with quick spool. It makes gobbs of power and it is a much more desireable turbo. Turbo logic 101 tells you that you can't have your cake and eat it to.

So now you want me to find you a link that shows a garrett gt3076r outperforming a brand new turbo that has been released in less than 1 week, that was tested by the world's greatest 4g63 shop-Buschur- on a 9 sec capable stage 3 built motor- oh yeah and of course driven by the guy who drives the worlds fastest (155+mph) evo street car? And just what data where you looking for, since the info is right in front of you and you still can't see it?

I won't be responding to you anymore. I don't do 'internet slugging'. It's beneath me. I tried to respect others by ignoring your previous posts since this was getting off topic, but you felt the need to wake up this morning and not watch the Flinstones like other good little boys,,, instead you want to get online and argue with grown men. Put an end to this. You sound like a 4kin idiot.

Nuff said. I'm done.


My apologies to everyone else for the bs.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #325  
sekula's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
so why dont you guys start a thread and argue there as this thread is called "forced performance evo red turbo data" not "*****ing and arguing"

basically, the evo red will make very good power all across the board, more top end than the evo green for sure, but we don't know for sure if it'll make as much as a 3076 because that is a bigger compressor housing and just a bigger turbo overall, so it has more top end potential, with the sacrifice of lag of course

thanks
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #326  
tony gibson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
Are you done lol???^^ I havent seen you "educate" anyone lmao...just get on here and whine and make claims that you cant even back up. I would love to see a 3076 even on a built stroker with an aem "CRUSH" the red....how many lbs/hr does a 3076 flow hmmm? I bet it isnt much if anymore than the red. An FP3065 is a 65lb turbo and it outflows a 3076....thats simple math in my book and I am mediocore with math at best lol Go buy a 3076 if you think it is som much...especially when price is a factor.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 12:52 PM
  #327  
dsmfan95's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 1
From: NC
Originally Posted by 4kinboost
You again huh?

I guess you didn't learn anything since our last debate?

Nice example of a 'maxed-out' 3076r... Ecutek reflash and 31psi max boost.
Buschur tested the HTA3076 on his RS a while back. It put down 504whp/462ftlb torque. That was on 31-32psi. I don't know if that's completely maxed out, but I bet it's close.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 01:14 PM
  #328  
4kinboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
From: long island,ny
Originally Posted by dsmfan95
Buschur tested the HTA3076 on his RS a while back. It put down 504whp/462ftlb torque. That was on 31-32psi. I don't know if that's completely maxed out, but I bet it's close.

Here's a link to the thread you are speaking about. I love sharing info- I hate arguing.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...uschur+HTA3076
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #329  
4kinboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
From: long island,ny
Originally Posted by sekula
so why dont you guys start a thread and argue there as this thread is called "forced performance evo red turbo data" not "*****ing and arguing"

basically, the evo red will make very good power all across the board, more top end than the evo green for sure, but we don't know for sure if it'll make as much as a 3076 because that is a bigger compressor housing and just a bigger turbo overall, so it has more top end potential, with the sacrifice of lag of course

thanks

Thank you so much for reading between the lines. We are all just discussing theory here and that is my opinion.

I think TedB said something very on point...

Originally Posted by Ted B

All else being equal, improving intake flow while relieving exhaust pressure/reversion at the same time reduces combustion charge temps, which reduces the detonation threshold - all at the same indicated manifold pressure. This illustrates why intake manifold pressure alone is of limited value without knowing exh manifold pressure.


.
This all co-ordinates my opinion. At the same time I must say this--- The spool-up/response and airflow characteristics of the FPRED makes it an awesome choice. In fact if I was building my pump gas, stocker motor with bolt-ons car all over again this may have been my turbo of choice. I still think that the 3076 can outperform this turbo in the upper rpm band but I have to admit it would be an unfair comparison with a tubular manifold and larger garrett hotside. Quite frankly I don't understand how this discussion got so heated.

I've already tuned my 10.5t evo8 turbo-- loved the response but not enough "push" on the road for my taste.

I've already tuned my gt3076r-- nice pick up in power on pump gas (433awhp on pump 93) , but for the added lag I'd rather have a bigger "push".

And now I'm in the process of tuning my 35r (506awhp on 93 pump).


Had this turbo been available sooner it would have been my turbo of choice. Stock appearing, tons of airflow, and no added price/fabrication to install. Dynocharts don't mean everything.
I continue to watch trent's results at the track and root for him to touch 9's with this new set-up.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #330  
Tarmacisback69's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Maryland
fp red fo sho
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:26 AM.