Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

3582HTA vs 6265 Dyno Comparo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2008, 04:02 PM
  #91  
Evolving Member
 
konstantinosIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Evoland
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you do the back to back test I am sure that you will have at least 5 to 10 orders for the winner turbo kit.
Which kit are you suggest to your customers?
AMS 850R or AMS HTA35R ????
Old Aug 7, 2008, 04:07 PM
  #92  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Crzbiasmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im sure your question would get answered quicker if you posted that up in ams's forum.
Old Aug 7, 2008, 04:07 PM
  #93  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
due the numbers we have seen on the GT850R we have been recommending that. This turbo has been able to produce Monster power and spool almost the same as a GT35R.

Eric
Old Aug 7, 2008, 04:32 PM
  #94  
Newbie
 
JPSR20DET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chile
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Crzbiasmr
holy run-on sentence...your language arts teacher failed!

Sorry but I dont undestand the meaning of your post...
I just give some feed back of what I have done .. take it for what it is just a test
Right now is pocible for me post the dyno diff between this 2 housings same day you can see the date on the dynosheet this are the only pics that I got since my old computer died its the only info I have got left( just recover this 1 day ago)
some pics






This dyno was with the Standar t04s housing at 1 bar




Dyno with the ported precision housing





The dyno its scaled different but you got the idea...
I will try to get this dynos from the dynoshop again re-scaled to see more cleary the diffs
Hope this people still keep them

My apologies to the owner of this post for the off topic.
Thanks.
Old Aug 7, 2008, 04:39 PM
  #95  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
we are actually talking about the difference between the two different ported shrouds. Correct me if I am wrong but it looks like you tested a non ported shroud to the drilled style ported shroud.

We are actually talking about comparing the drilled style ported shroud to the slotted style Garrett ported shroud.
Old Aug 7, 2008, 04:52 PM
  #96  
Newbie
 
JPSR20DET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chile
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are right Eric my mistake I just realized it.
But even with the drilled ported housing there was a little diff.
Take care.
Old Aug 7, 2008, 06:31 PM
  #97  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
hks-gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LONG ISLAND
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe I missed it, but was the Pte 6265 a bb or non bb version that was tested against the Hta3582?
Old Aug 7, 2008, 06:41 PM
  #98  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
DynoFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ForcedPerformance
I need to figure out how to quote someone and not clip off their name

From a manufacturing perspective, it is much faster and simpler to drill a circle of holes and mill the grove in the cover than it is to remove all that material and do a full on surge port. If I were to make a educated guess, I would say that you could process 5 bullet hole covers in the time it takes to process 1 TiAl style cover. Economics is often a motivator for manufacturing processes.
When I was originally sold the swiss chese cover several years ago, I was told its "just as good" as the genuine garret ported shorud unit

Since HKS has some jazzy looking turbos with fanzy holes I figured it must be true

Time and time again I came to dread the swiss cheese holes and the medicore results that come along with those covers

At the end of the day the results speak volumes for which approach works
Old Aug 7, 2008, 06:55 PM
  #99  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Migsubishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tampa bay area
Posts: 1,491
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
HTA35R vs 850R test FTW!!!!!!!!
Old Aug 8, 2008, 09:54 AM
  #100  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ForcedPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An important thing to keep in mind with both of these turbos is price point. AMS brought this up to us over and over. Our turbo is expensive, and our wholesale margins are usually described as "crappy" by most shops. Lots of shops would be much more inclined to use and sell our turbocharger if it were something they could profit from, make money on.

If you can make 15%-20% more profit selling one item over another, it doesnt take long for you to pick a champion to promote. Don't kid yourself into thinking that money doesn't factor into product reviews. Our product is expensive and we are unable to give shops huge discounts on these turbos, on top of that Garrett has somewhat limited availability on 35R chra. This produces unhappy distributors that need something to sell and make money on, que the PTE turbos, enter stage left.

At the same time there are a few guys out there that just want the best. Buschur for example will run whatever works best on his cars, regardless. This is a double edged sword for me working with him since it also means that whenever something else works better than my product, that is what ends up on his cars, period end of story. At the same time, it also tells me that none of the PTE turbos he has ever run work any better than our HTA.

Last edited by ForcedPerformance; Aug 8, 2008 at 10:21 AM. Reason: correct my poor grammer
Old Aug 8, 2008, 10:11 AM
  #101  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
hks-gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LONG ISLAND
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hks-gst
Maybe I missed it, but was the Pte 6265 a bb or non bb version that was tested against the Hta3582?

................?
Old Aug 8, 2008, 10:20 AM
  #102  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ForcedPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The PTE6265 turbo sample we have is a BB, and I think they are all BB. The 35R CHRa are BB and all 3582HTA turbos are BB also.
Old Aug 8, 2008, 10:56 AM
  #103  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Migsubishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tampa bay area
Posts: 1,491
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by ForcedPerformance
Buschur for example will run whatever works best on his cars, regardless. This is a double edged sword for me working with him since it also means that whenever something else works better than my product, that is what ends up on his cars, period end of story. At the same time, it also tells me that none of the PTE turbos he has ever run work any better than our HTA.
Nuff Said /End Thread
Old Aug 10, 2008, 08:31 PM
  #104  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
03whitegsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,001
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
There can be very subtle differences in machining on the housing that can make for very significant differences in power. Precision use to have issues with holding tolerances on the diffuser of the compressor housings. A friend of mine was running a PT71 where simply swapping compressor housings around he managed to pick up 80 WHP.

I'm not talking different styles of housings either. I'm talking exact same housing style, just switching out one cover for another and pickup up 80 WHP on a 700 HP car. When inspected, you could visually tell the diffuser area was different on the two housings and it was the older housing that he had on his car for 2 years that made the higher power.

Just something to think about while comparing housings.
Old Aug 10, 2008, 11:25 PM
  #105  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
DynoFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ForcedPerformance
An important thing to keep in mind with both of these turbos is price point. AMS brought this up to us over and over. Our turbo is expensive, and our wholesale margins are usually described as "crappy" by most shops. Lots of shops would be much more inclined to use and sell our turbocharger if it were something they could profit from, make money on.

If you can make 15%-20% more profit selling one item over another, it doesnt take long for you to pick a champion to promote. Don't kid yourself into thinking that money doesn't factor into product reviews. Our product is expensive and we are unable to give shops huge discounts on these turbos, on top of that Garrett has somewhat limited availability on 35R chra. This produces unhappy distributors that need something to sell and make money on, que the PTE turbos, enter stage left.

At the same time there are a few guys out there that just want the best. Buschur for example will run whatever works best on his cars, regardless. This is a double edged sword for me working with him since it also means that whenever something else works better than my product, that is what ends up on his cars, period end of story. At the same time, it also tells me that none of the PTE turbos he has ever run work any better than our HTA.

There are two aspects to price point

Retail price

Profit margin

While you are very correct that there is little margin or profitability built into the FP line of turbos, I would doubt that any serious performance house if is going to push a cheaper turbo just to make a few more $. In most cases the sale of the turbo upgrade or turbo is just part of a whole turbo kit, injectors, install and tuning. Simply put, I dont think that any serious facility would recomend a sub par product to try and gain a bit more profit.

For example I only sell Buschur Racing parts which have the lowest dealer margins of any speed parts - period. I would rather know that my customer is getting the best American made parts that can be bought and dont mind it if they are slightly less profitable for me.

I dont agree with you that some of my fellow tuners would shy away from your product becuase they make less selling it. At least I like to think that way about my peers. We are an industry which focuses on results and data. I cant see any serious shop pushing sub par products.

I guess one simple soultion is to try and build more profit into your dealer's margins.

While we only make 10% selling your FP HTA upgrade, I would still recomend it to my customer as when the car is done I know they will be happy with the results.


The RETAIL PRICE issue is a more significant issue for the customers, especially in a weak economic climate. If the customer thinks they can make the same power with a turbo which costs several hundred dollars less then that may be motivated to save some money and go with a lower priced unit.

The PT 62/62 is a lower priced turbo and the customer will save some money if they go that direction.

I am not sure if the dealer makes more money on that unit as most sales of PT turbos occur below retail price. While FP units are all at retail as there is no margin left to discount it.

I do agree that the FP HTA units are certainly the best turbos available at this time and the results prove that they are the best you can buy - period.

I would only run FP HTA units on my own cars.

Al

Last edited by DynoFlash; Aug 10, 2008 at 11:29 PM.


Quick Reply: 3582HTA vs 6265 Dyno Comparo



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:40 AM.