Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Aluminum rods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #46  
SILVERnSLOW's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
I am looking at building a long rod 2.0 for my 57 trim witch will turn into an hta35r sometime in the next 2 years. Looking to put out 500ish on the 57 and 600-650 on the 35 (both on e85).

Would you recommend alum. rods for this kind of build? Will the possibility of having a lighter piston have any effects on the aluminum rod pro or con?

Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #47  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
SILVERnSLOW- I would only because I dont like to see people spend money twice on parts of engine rebuilds. If you intend to step the car up to 600+whp with an ultimate goal of 650 or so I think your bearings and overall engine life will be greatly enhanced. 156mm 2.0 will be pretty cool by itself. I get stoked hearing about all these non-typical builds.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 07:52 PM
  #48  
Sykotic's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: California
What if you were building a 2.6L with really high compression, 10-11:1, and high boost, 40-50psi, with the rod angle and increased cylinder pressures would aluminum rods be strong enough? It seems like for strokers something like carrillos or pauters would be better than bme and grodens with the opposite being true for 2.0L and 2.1L. Confirm or deny?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #49  
miragevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 488
Likes: 7
From: Long Island, NY
Are Aluminum Rods able to handle the extra compression type loads of a stroker?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #50  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
Cant wait to build my motor w/ these rods Aaron.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 12:14 AM
  #51  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
They handle 1400whp so I doubt there is much you can throw at them that will make them just break. The lighter weight is ideal in a stroker becuase you are talking about reducing reciprocating mass which frees up the engines ability to rpm (or in english frees up hp). Remember these are the rods that are in TOP ALCOHOL and TOP FUEL, I am pretty sure our stuff is covered under that umbrella

It still comes down to things like bearing life, reciprocating mass, etc.

I am curious why you are building a 2.6 that will see 50psi? Honestly you will have lag no matter what so opting for a better R/S ratio of the 2.4 is a better way to go, if not something like a 2.3L 4G64.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #52  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Brent Rau likes these rods
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 03:53 PM
  #53  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
Brent Rau likes these rods
Exactly
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 09:14 PM
  #54  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
How about Al, I know hes been running aluminum for awhile.
IIRC, one snapped in half on him, wreaking the usual havoc.

When it comes to attempting to gauge the service life of the rods, I'm not certain that checking for stretch is a viable/reliable indicator. Those rods do continually stretch and compress while the engine is running. This is why engine building guides will typicall advise to increase piston/head clearance by 40-50% more than an equivalent steel rod engine. If pistons begin to kiss the heads, it's curtains.

Aluminum rods definitely have advantages and disadvantages, just like anything else. I remain highly skeptical of manufacturers' claims, simply because they produce no data pool, no statistics, and since they can't really be held accountable, they're free to say pretty much anything they like.

Ultimately, it boils down to what is practical and financially acceptable to an individual. Regardless of what's claimed, I would advise changing these rods at regular intervals. I would advise the same for the rod bearings for high HP steel rod motors that are expected to last (DD applications). For me, it's far easier and more cost effective to change rod bearings than rods. Those with unfettered access to a specialized shop, low cost expertise and labor, and parts at jobber cost are likely to see a different range of practicality than most.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 03:46 AM
  #55  
EE's Avatar
EE
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Lebanon
^ nice
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 06:57 AM
  #56  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by Ted B
IIRC, one snapped in half on him, wreaking the usual havoc.

When it comes to attempting to gauge the service life of the rods, I'm not certain that checking for stretch is a viable/reliable indicator. Those rods do continually stretch and compress while the engine is running. This is why engine building guides will typicall advise to increase piston/head clearance by 40-50% more than an equivalent steel rod engine. If pistons begin to kiss the heads, it's curtains.

Aluminum rods definitely have advantages and disadvantages, just like anything else. I remain highly skeptical of manufacturers' claims, simply because they produce no data pool, no statistics, and since they can't really be held accountable, they're free to say pretty much anything they like.

Ultimately, it boils down to what is practical and financially acceptable to an individual. Regardless of what's claimed, I would advise changing these rods at regular intervals. I would advise the same for the rod bearings for high HP steel rod motors that are expected to last (DD applications). For me, it's far easier and more cost effective to change rod bearings than rods. Those with unfettered access to a specialized shop, low cost expertise and labor, and parts at jobber cost are likely to see a different range of practicality than most.

Those engine building guides i beleive are more geared toward v8's.. From my experience a tiny 85mm piston doesnt cause as much rod stretch as a BBC will.. Taking that into consideration i still believe that aluminum for big hp has more advantages then disadvantages.. I havent seen an aluminum rod fail as of yet.. I have seen wreckage due to other failure but not rod failure being the cause of the wreckage..

Mike
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 07:35 AM
  #57  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
I havent seen an aluminum rod fail as of yet.. I have seen wreckage due to other failure but not rod failure being the cause of the wreckage..
Right here Mike:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/5801773-post1.html

I understand your point about the smaller mass piston not creating as much force (which ultimately stretches the rod). I would think that the mass of the rod would (or should) be sized with approximate piston mass taken into account. Maybe they do this or maybe not, I don't know.

Again, I'm not arguing the virtue of an Al rod, I am questioning the practicality of changing the rods at periodic intervals vs changing the bearings. I'm not questioning it from a vendor/drag racer point of view, but from a retail consumer/daily driven transportation point of view.

For those who may find it interesting, here are some average rod masses for common 4G63 rods. These are for a 6-bolt 4G63, but I'd expect the 7-bolt figures to be relative:

Stock = 695 grams

Aluminum:
GRP = 470 grams
Map = 470-480 grams
Groden = 490 grams
R&R = 500 grams

All other material:
Crower titanium = 410 grams
Carrillo = 520 grams
Engine pro = 557 gram
Manley H beam = 573 grams
Eagle = 575 grams
Oliver = 605 grams
Pauter lightweight = 610 grams
Crower = 612 grams
Scat = 640 grams
Map billet rods = 652 grams
Pauter = 685 grams
Manley I beam = 690 grams

(from DSMtuners.com)

Last edited by Ted B; Dec 30, 2008 at 07:37 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 07:49 AM
  #58  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by Ted B
Right here Mike:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/5801773-post1.html

I understand your point about the smaller mass piston not creating as much force (which ultimately stretches the rod). I would think that the mass of the rod would (or should) be sized with approximate piston mass taken into account. Maybe they do this or maybe not, I don't know.

Again, I'm not arguing the virtue of an Al rod, I am questioning the practicality of changing the rods at periodic intervals vs changing the bearings. I'm not questioning it from a vendor/drag racer point of view, but from a retail consumer/daily driven transportation point of view.

For those who may find it interesting, here are some average rod masses for common 4G63 rods. These are for a 6-bolt 4G63, but I'd expect the 7-bolt figures to be relative:

Stock = 695 grams

Aluminum:
GRP = 470 grams
Map = 470-480 grams
Groden = 490 grams
R&R = 500 grams

All other material:
Crower titanium = 410 grams
Carrillo = 520 grams
Engine pro = 557 gram
Manley H beam = 573 grams
Eagle = 575 grams
Oliver = 605 grams
Pauter lightweight = 610 grams
Crower = 612 grams
Scat = 640 grams
Map billet rods = 652 grams
Pauter = 685 grams
Manley I beam = 690 grams

(from DSMtuners.com)

Maybe i should have specified better.. of course i am aware there have been aluminum rods that people have broken.. I personally havent seen a failure myself on any of my motors.. My little RS that ran 8's is still getting beat on weekly on the streets today.. The picture of Al's broken rod could have come from any failure in the motor. I am not sure if he determined the exact cause or not.. Also, i might be mistaken but i believe he had re tq'd those rods more than 1x also.. Unless i see the failure for myself on something we have assembled and tuned here i dont see any drawback to the aluminum rods yet..

Mike
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 08:22 AM
  #59  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
My little RS that ran 8's is still getting beat on weekly on the streets today.. Unless i see the failure for myself on something we have assembled and tuned here i dont see any drawback to the aluminum rods yet..
Sure, but the only thing that can prove anything for certain is the passage of time. Not a few passes at the track, not a few months of use, not a few thousand miles. Why? Because time (specifically heat cycles) is the thing that eventually fatigues aluminum to failure. When she goes, nobody really knows, and that is the issue at hand.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 08:30 AM
  #60  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by Ted B
Sure, but the only thing that can prove anything for certain is the passage of time. Not a few passes at the track, not a few months of use, not a few thousand miles. Why? Because time (specifically heat cycles) is the thing that eventually fatigues aluminum to failure. When she goes, nobody really knows, and that is the issue at hand.

Well I think there have been 12k miles logged atleast on an aluminum rod motor and its still running so thats good sign.. Id never really expect 12k miles out of a race motor that sees 50-60psi.. Thats a lot of street driving and track use.. In most cases you go to aluminum rods for a race motor not for longevity of street use.. So if its 2k heat cycles before they lose shape and break i can handle that..
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:45 AM.