Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

evo 8 tubular k member.. whos making one

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 04:02 PM
  #31  
Most-Wanted's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 5
From: ATLANTA
Sign me up for one I'm sure Mike at AWD would buy one also. An 800 WHP 2200# evo would be ridiculous....
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #32  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by Most-Wanted
Sign me up for one I'm sure Mike at AWD would buy one also. An 800 WHP 2200# evo would be ridiculous....
I already have something in the works..
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #33  
dsmfan95's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 1
From: NC
Subscribed
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 05:43 PM
  #34  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 7
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
I already have something in the works..

cool mike. promise to keep me posted. either through pm or here. are your goals for 100% street able and lightweight or is this a drag only part your making??? i would personally love a 100%street able part but be as light as possible. as for all that stuff Ivan said. im also interested in that but thats another story. seems his thoughts are to add other parts and go extreme with this witch im also down for. i just need to learn wtf he is saying. HAHAH
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2008 | 05:51 PM
  #35  
Mulholland0132's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 848
Likes: 1
From: CT
Originally Posted by dsmfan95
subscribed
+1
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 10:27 AM
  #36  
Ivan@AMS's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
Originally Posted by evodan2004
as for all that stuff Ivan said. im also interested in that but thats another story. seems his thoughts are to add other parts and go extreme with this witch im also down for. i just need to learn wtf he is saying. HAHAH
I will try to explain where I am coming from.

Lowering the car is important for many reasons for both road racing and drag racing. Lower center of gravity and aero advantages are at the top of the list. The issue with lowering the car is: you have just messed up your suspension geometry.

Your caster, camber and tow all change as the suspension moves through its travel. This is factory engineered. It is supposed to change to help the car turn and maintain tire contact with the road. Lowering the car changes all this as your suspension is now starting its travel in an area of the camber / tow curve that was supposed to be designated for turning. You have also changed your roll center which changes how side loads affect the suspension. The more you lower the car, the further outside factory specs you get.

The best way to lower the car and keep the factory engineered suspension geometry is to move the inboard suspension points.

Here is a quick MS Paint drawing to show visually what I am talking about. This depicts what happens to the front control arm in a lowered car.



As you can see, moving the inboard suspension point up after lowering positions the control arm as it was designed by the factory.


On both the 8/9 and X, the front suspension mounting points are on the subframe. This makes keeping factory suspension geometry easy when moving them up.

When you get to the rear subframes, the 8/9 have a control arm mounted to the body in addition to the trailing arm. This makes keeping factory suspension impossible without moving the point on the body.

The X rear suspension has all mounting points on the subframe with the exception of the trailing arm. This makes it much easier to move suspension points.

I know this doesn't mean much to those that are solely interested in going straight but if we are going to put the effort into building subframes, it makes sense to try to cover all bases.

While on the subject of drag racing, there would be a benefit in eliminating the factory camber curve. The issue is more so in the rear of the Evo as the front camber does not change much. In the rear of the car, camber changes during a launch generally pull the outside of the tires off the ground limiting traction. This is especially prevalent when using stiff sidewall radials over soft sidewall slicks. The way to eliminate the camber curve is to run more equal length control arms. Obviously a rear subframe for drag racing would differ from one for road racing.

Sorry this got so long and thanks to anybody that read the whole reply. Basically, I am interested in hearing what is important to people (besides weight reduction) when it comes to a custom tubular subframe.

Last edited by Ivan@AMS; Dec 28, 2008 at 10:32 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 10:37 AM
  #37  
2k4EvoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: "Tri-Cities" WA
Ivan:

I think you hit the nail on the head. Really although i personally would only be interested in a drag setup. From a business point of view the more you can do to the same piece to cover all your basis the better. For drag guys that maybe dont need extra mounting points or whatever maybe you can just have brackets cut off depending on what they are asking for.

Anyway wish you were closer seems you know your stuff with suspension setup. I could really use you for next season.

And Mike @ AWD please keep us posted on your findings also. I believe about a year ago NRGTech made something for a 3000GT and had pictures posted around here somewhere.

Chris

EDIT: Here is a link to a Subframe NRGTech made for a 3000GT. From what i hear they are building a front and rear subframe for a EVO as we speak.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/we...-subframe.html

Last edited by 2k4EvoVIII; Dec 28, 2008 at 10:48 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 10:45 AM
  #38  
Billy@EnglishRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
Really excited to see where this thread goes, I was talking about this last night before i saw the thread
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #39  
Ivan@AMS's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
For me the suspension geometry is the sole reason. IF we could tune roll centers a little easier and dare I say lower the engine a little (I know this is not as easy as it was to type), there are significant gains to be had in road racing.

The Zero camber change rear end geometry has advantages as well.
I think on an Evo, lowering the motor may be as easy as using offset motor mount bushings. This is something we have been looking at.

Justin and I are currently working with the factory subframes on the Evo X. By cutting down the points on the subframe where it attaches to the body, we are essentially moving all of the factory suspension points up. This will aid in keeping a lowered car closer to factory geometry.

Unfortunately, moving the front subframe up is reducing clearance and causing fitment issues with the rack to the body, rack to the transfer case and subframe to engine, trans and transfer case, etc.... I do not see an issue that cant be resolved at this point, but plans on dropping the motor lower in the engine compartment have been suspended. We may be able to lower the motor with a custom tubular subframe in the future.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #40  
evofool's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR pnw
removing weight and fixing the front supspension geometry at the same time would be perfect, definetely be in on that
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 10:27 PM
  #41  
evovin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,374
Likes: 0
From: Florida
This is interesting.

*Dumb question:
would this void you insurance claim incase of accident? I guess....

but interested here so count me in!

Last edited by evovin; Dec 28, 2008 at 10:39 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 10:30 PM
  #42  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 7
From: New Jersey
Ivan thanks for the reply. Well said and under stud . I'm interested to see where this go's
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 10:42 PM
  #43  
fbikawi's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Abu Dhabi, UAE
i am highly interested and would definitaly buy this immediately.

interested in the weight reduction and the suspension geometry fixing.

evodan2004,

if you managed to get this done please send me a pm.

thanks for AMS and AWD for considering this.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #44  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 7
From: New Jersey
any more info out there?
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #45  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 7
From: New Jersey
anyone?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:11 PM.