Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

evo 8 tubular k member.. whos making one

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 03:01 PM
  #46  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Nothing here. I called and expressed interest to AMS...so we get to wait and see. My other "plan" didnt pan out so nothing to report.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 03:05 PM
  #47  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
thanks john. i hope we can get something. at the least just a light weight k member. AMS come through for us.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 04:58 AM
  #48  
chuntington101's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: UK
sounds pretty intresting! just please make sure its nice and strong! also rose vointing everything would be helpfull for the all out race people!

Chris.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 06:22 AM
  #49  
Craig King's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: NW Pennsylvania
Nice custom fabrication!!


Originally Posted by LT1runner
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #50  
Most-Wanted's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 5
From: ATLANTA
I have a question about the statement from Ivan. If you are lowering the car via points on the k member, how are you going to address the rear ride height. I personally would rather have stock height and use my coil overs to adjust ride height.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #51  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
K member would be used to correct roll center more than it lowers the car.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #52  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
Also interested to see what everyone comes up w/
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 09:57 PM
  #53  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Ivan@AMS
I have to agree that weight savings would not be the primary benefit. Clutch jobs and transfer case removal would be easier for sure..... but being able to change around suspension geometry would be the main reason IMO. Combined with some chromoly adjustable suspension arms, it would be a wicked combo but quite cost prohibitive.
http://www.lancershop.com/customer/p...505&cat=7&page=

There are are the cro-mo adjustable arms. $1700 a set. I have the Nagisa rear bits, and the fronts will be in this spring. I'd buy a front tubular subframe if it came in at or under that price-point. . .

Building the first one and making the jig would be the expensive part. Let's say you can work that cost into the first 10 units (I bet you can sell 10 the first year) then it shouldn't be THAT expensive. . .
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 10:04 PM
  #54  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
BTW, want this for RR/AX suspension geometry benefits. Weight savings would also be great.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 10:48 PM
  #55  
DaveK's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by Ivan@AMS
Basically, I am interested in hearing what is important to people (besides weight reduction) when it comes to a custom tubular subframe.
This is certainly one of the things I was thinking about when trying to figure out how to lighten the PPIHC car, but I'll need to do some digging on the rule sets from the different groups I run with to see if I'm allowed to change the suspension geometry. In addition, I'm pretty sure I run my car at stock height or higher, so I'm guessing any geometry corrections that were engineered into this product wouldn't benefit me that much.

For now, I'd say lighter weight and easier accessability to the underside of the car would be my top "plusses" for a mod like this.

Dave
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 10:57 PM
  #56  
LT1runner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Nashville Metro
Originally Posted by Craig King
Nice custom fabrication!!
Thanks but I just bought it from BMR fabracations. That guy has some talent.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #57  
Fairclough's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: South Jordan, UT
I have a friend that owns a custom chassis shop, he said he could do it easy, he just needs a stock k-member.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 12:24 AM
  #58  
jbfoco's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Rohnert Park, CA
id be up for one if price was reasonable... this kinda stuff gets me excited.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 12:54 AM
  #59  
casper980's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Ivan, how about a dry sump setup + tubular K member! Lower the engine, maybe push it back a little, fix the suspension geometry...maybe that HKS Evo craziness would be closer to the common mans grasp! weight is always nice to lose, but most of us could lose 20lbs for free! Just jog a little. lol
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 03:33 AM
  #60  
tkklemann's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
At least the initial investiment for a Sub-Frame wouldn't be all that much, I believe last time I checked a Sub-Frame was a touch less than $400 from Mitsubishiparts.net. (Shipping might suck, but......)

Someone/Some vendor could pick up an OEM sub-frame for a very reasonable price and make their jig off that. Heck, if I had $400 right now (Don't because I just tore my clutch up and put in a Tilton) I would buy one and start to fabricate it up. If our stock Sub-frame was replaced with a tubular, maintenance would become pretty rediculously easy as it would clear up ton's of space on the rear bottom of the engine area. Plus, what would also be nice is to replace the parts of the member that have the weld nuts on the inside of the frame. After my car living through three Buffalo, NY winters, lets just say I had to improvise when getting the bolts out/and back in when they siezed up due to the salt & rust.

I would pick one up just because of how much easier the car would be to work on.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:06 PM.