The "Bite" has a new toy to play with 6765 AKA 950R!!!
You got it , I think also I would make better with a 6262 and 82. a/r for sure it will unleash the hidden power that's missing, I'm going to switch my AMS set up very soon and going with something else that 63. back housing is not cutting it but im very limited with the AMS kit.
Good call man! The AMS kit is still the best and well crafted kit for a 450-600 whp (dynojet) Evo. When the kit was made the smaller runner manifold, and .63 housing are perfect for Horsepower and Torque in that 450-600whp. Now with all these big "small" turbos running around. To extract that power up you need to step up to a bigger runner manifold, and a bigger turbine housing.
Good luck with your Sick Ride..
, I got your PM it will be time to shine very soon , I'll let yu know see if want to ride out 
You got it , I think also I would make better with a 6262 and 82. a/r for sure it will unleash the hidden power that's missing, I'm going to switch my AMS set up very soon and going with something else that 63. back housing is not cutting it but im very limited with the AMS kit.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
I was very intrested in your dyno numbers but it got kinda of quite so I didnt hear anything else.
Newbie
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Switch over to a kit that allows .82 rear and if you have room get the big cover with 3" outlet... My feeling is that the 6765 needs more room to breathe and thats why its down on power.. We did make around 40 more HP over the 6262 but i think my setup was even limited with small front cover, 2.5" piping and 65mm TB.. I am going to step up the piping and TB and well see if i can get the 875whp i think the 6765 is capable of.. Ill have results next week.. Ill keep you guys updated..
Mike
Mike
Newbie
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Mike, I'm tracking my .81 T4 housing and I should have some new numbers next week as well.(Maybe even this weekend.)
I'm more curious to see if I have to step up to the .96 a/r due to backpressure issues with the smaller housings.
Next week should be interesting for us both.
I'm more curious to see if I have to step up to the .96 a/r due to backpressure issues with the smaller housings.
Next week should be interesting for us both.
You got it , I think also I would make better with a 6262 and 82. a/r for sure it will unleash the hidden power that's missing, I'm going to switch my AMS set up very soon and going with something else that 63. back housing is not cutting it but im very limited with the AMS kit.
I would go with the the .82 ar if i was you since your on a stroker. And your looking to make mad power.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
The only way I see to go is with a shear header and then my choices open up as of right now im just stuck with this AMS kit which will be for sale very soon 