BR presents the new FP BLACK HTA82!
Oct 20, 2009, 10:25 AM
#47
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (74)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: miami florida
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting dyno results Mr. Buschur. Thanks for posting them! But it still takes 41.4 psi and E85 to make that 537whp on a fully built Evo? Most of us here would much rather see a pump gas tune with around 30 to 35 psi instead. But maybe thats in a perfect world so to speak.
Oct 20, 2009, 10:25 AM
#48
Interesting dyno results Mr. Buschur. Thanks for posting them! But it still takes 41.4 psi and E85 to make that 537whp on a fully built Evo? Most of us here would much rather see a pump gas tune with around 30 to 35 psi instead. But maybe thats in a perfect world so to speak.
#2) Pump gas dyno's will be out soon enough. I think Dave was right to compare the two turbo's running flat out.
#3) I don't think you'd have a whole lot of success keeping con-rods inside your block if you ran this turbo all out on a stock block.
Oct 20, 2009, 10:47 AM
#52
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It looks like the bottom line numbers for a best comparison are
RED - 494 whp / 507 ft/lbs
BLACK - 537 whp / 522 ft/lbs
Am I incorrect?
Oct 20, 2009, 10:49 AM
#53
This turbo appears to me to be good enough to autocross, 20 psi of boost at 3800 rpm is pretty low in the RPM range. I'd say this turbo looks to be the best all around turbo there is, autocross, road course, drag, whatever.
The turbo comes with the HD actuator and the oil line kit. That is not the i/c pipe kit.
The turbo comes with the HD actuator and the oil line kit. That is not the i/c pipe kit.
Oct 20, 2009, 10:56 AM
#55
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Chester, OH
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea i know but still want want to see how it lays down on 93 oct. ill have a built head and 2.3 installed so thats good but i dont have the luxury of e85 here so a 93 oct test to make sure its still spooling great and putting down some numbers is in order but hey least you put a test out there thanks dave. just hard for me to pull the trigger as i want a good road racing/somewhat drag turbo with decent spool up.
Read before you post.
Oct 20, 2009, 10:56 AM
#56
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think pushing this turbo on a stock block with all the bolt-ons might be a little too much like RTErnie said.
David, do you think running this turbo on a stock block safely will even be worth it? I think you will end up having to cut so much of the turbos potential it will end up being a waste.
David, do you think running this turbo on a stock block safely will even be worth it? I think you will end up having to cut so much of the turbos potential it will end up being a waste.
Oct 20, 2009, 11:03 AM
#57
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info Dave, 40 psi is just gettin ridiculous.
Wonder if this will be the end of the FP turbo line for the Evo 8/9's for a while.
Stock block + HTA82 = carnage. Good luck to anyone willing to sacrafice their block for the experiment.
- Steve
Wonder if this will be the end of the FP turbo line for the Evo 8/9's for a while.
Stock block + HTA82 = carnage. Good luck to anyone willing to sacrafice their block for the experiment.
- Steve
