BR, 2.4, high hp/high rpm build?
no its not that much of a difference.. its about 40whp over what ive seen. I loaded my logs in virtual dyno and i was within 30-40whp diff from iveys dynojet vs buschurs mustang. iveys dyno numbers were spot on with evoM's dyno numbers. the dynojet numbers in that java program are inflated to hell. so 477/488 - still a beast of a car. i hope my 2.3 can do this at low boost like your car is.
Its not 30-40 whp off. Dyno's read different by percentages. at your lower level the difference may be about 30-40 hp but the more power you make the greater the difference will be. When evom still had the 500whp stock block club they would correct mustang dyno numbers to 18% I believe.
433 + 52 = 485 what you got at 12%. ask Buschur what it is though, its his dyno he will know best.
if you got anywhere close to 500wtq your car should feel like a rocket ship.
no i was taking 12% from your number (433) which finds the missing 12% you would have from a dynojet. so once you find that number you add it to your 433 to find your dynojet numbers. its 52 on windows calculator, maybe your calculator is not working right or you have it setup for some kind of different setting
ya youre confusing me now.. you cant work it backwards and get the same number.... no clue...
all i know is your whp was 433 so id figure to find the 12% loss you take 433 x .12 and then you add that number to the 433 and thats your number in dynojet..
all i know is your whp was 433 so id figure to find the 12% loss you take 433 x .12 and then you add that number to the 433 and thats your number in dynojet..


