Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

for anyone that has crankcase pressure issues

Old Mar 7, 2016 | 06:53 PM
  #1276  
3gturbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 571
Likes: 8
From: Charlotte
Originally Posted by XSivPSI
First, I spent several days reading every single post in the thread and I was sure the 1/2NPT -> 5/8" hose to the intake pipe would fix my issues but I was mistaken

3 weeks ago I installed a XR BB Red and ever since, I get a blue smoke screen when coasting to a stop and taking off (e.g. coming to a stop sign; doing a three point turn; backing into a parking spot) and also while in boost, but much less noticeable. When cruising down the road and at a sustained idle it seems fine though. So this weekend I drilled out the line that connects the VC to the pre turbo intake to 1/2 npt and have a 5/8" hose from that to the intake but there has been basically no change. I still have the stock PCV hooked up. I haven't seen any oil on the intake side, just smoke from the exhaust. Stock block with 105k miles. No issues or smoking before the BB FP Red.

I have purchased the STM -10AN fitting for the rear of the VC and a 1/2" boomba check valve before I read that Tom went back to stock PCV and the large line on the side of the VC to the intake pipe. I was hoping that would be sufficient for me. I prefer to keep it simple.

Will the car be able to idle correctly if I increase the PCV flow with a 1/2" line and the boomba CV, removing the stock PCV? I'm assuming it won't idle well. Would running both enlarged VC vents to the intake pipe be good or should I just try venting them both to atmosphere?

I did verify my PCV functions. I pressurized it to 40psi and while it does leak it is a very small amount. Lightly touching my finger to the back side of the valve stops the leak, very little flow rate and pressure leaks. I'd prefer to keep the PCV system but I gotta get this smoking to stop.

Did we ever determine what application the purple .020" restrictor is for that FP recently put on their site? Maybe I need that?

Its an embarrassing amount of smoke... I wouldn't really care about small puff here and there or even in boost but this is ridiculous.

I believe the engine is healthy, its making ~430 whp @25psi running a little too rich (minimal tuning done so far due to the smoke). I'm going to do a leak down test soon and if I can find a compression tester, I'll do that too.
What size restrictor are you running and where is your oil feed?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 07:04 PM
  #1277  
XSivPSI's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 27
From: Huntsville, AL
The black 0.030" restrictor from the head that FP supplied with the turbo.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 05:34 AM
  #1278  
dr_latino999's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Army
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 424
Likes: 18
From: Central TX
Originally Posted by XSivPSI
First, I spent several days reading every single post in the thread and I was sure the 1/2NPT -> 5/8" hose to the intake pipe would fix my issues but I was mistaken

3 weeks ago I installed a XR BB Red and ever since, I get a blue smoke screen when coasting to a stop and taking off (e.g. coming to a stop sign; doing a three point turn; backing into a parking spot) and also while in boost, but much less noticeable. When cruising down the road and at a sustained idle it seems fine though. So this weekend I drilled out the line that connects the VC to the pre turbo intake to 1/2 npt and have a 5/8" hose from that to the intake but there has been basically no change. I still have the stock PCV hooked up. I haven't seen any oil on the intake side, just smoke from the exhaust. Stock block with 105k miles. No issues or smoking before the BB FP Red.

I have purchased the STM -10AN fitting for the rear of the VC and a 1/2" boomba check valve before I read that Tom went back to stock PCV and the large line on the side of the VC to the intake pipe. I was hoping that would be sufficient for me. I prefer to keep it simple.

Will the car be able to idle correctly if I increase the PCV flow with a 1/2" line and the boomba CV, removing the stock PCV? I'm assuming it won't idle well. Would running both enlarged VC vents to the intake pipe be good or should I just try venting them both to atmosphere?

I did verify my PCV functions. I pressurized it to 40psi and while it does leak it is a very small amount. Lightly touching my finger to the back side of the valve stops the leak, very little flow rate and pressure leaks. I'd prefer to keep the PCV system but I gotta get this smoking to stop.

Did we ever determine what application the purple .020" restrictor is for that FP recently put on their site? Maybe I need that?

Its an embarrassing amount of smoke... I wouldn't really care about small puff here and there or even in boost but this is ridiculous.

I believe the engine is healthy, its making ~430 whp @25psi running a little too rich (minimal tuning done so far due to the smoke). I'm going to do a leak down test soon and if I can find a compression tester, I'll do that too.
I'll be honest, I had the same issue with my last gen DBB Red until I opened up the PCV system with 3x -10 fittings, and two recirculating cans. Completely overkill but no more smoking / oil consumption.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 05:47 AM
  #1279  
XSivPSI's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 27
From: Huntsville, AL
Originally Posted by dr_latino999
I'll be honest, I had the same issue with my last gen DBB Red until I opened up the PCV system with 3x -10 fittings, and two recirculating cans. Completely overkill but no more smoking / oil consumption.
Thanks for the input. Can you expound on your set up a little more? Did you run two back to the intake pipe and one to the intake manifold or what?

When I get time I'm opening up the rear port to -10 and I'll probably just VTA it with a check valve so it doesn't pull in un-metered air if the line to the intake happens to pull enough under boost and ditch the pcv.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 07:02 AM
  #1280  
3gturbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 571
Likes: 8
From: Charlotte
Originally Posted by XSivPSI
Thanks for the input. Can you expound on your set up a little more? Did you run two back to the intake pipe and one to the intake manifold or what?

When I get time I'm opening up the rear port to -10 and I'll probably just VTA it with a check valve so it doesn't pull in un-metered air if the line to the intake happens to pull enough under boost and ditch the pcv.
Im using crank vents as well http://www.3sx.com/store/comersus_vi...?idProduct=895
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 08:11 AM
  #1281  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
You guys are hiding an actual problem with your setup if you have to use 3 huge ports to remove the issue. a single 5/8 hole on the driver side fixed my car and many others 100%, and i make almost double the power then most people on here with issues. 750wtq the last time i had my car out. use your imagination to figure out the HP in that.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 08:13 AM
  #1282  
XSivPSI's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 27
From: Huntsville, AL
Originally Posted by tscompusa
You guys are hiding an actual problem with your setup if you have to use 3 huge ports to remove the issue. a single 5/8 hole on the driver side fixed my car and many others 100%, and i make almost double the power then most people on here with issues. 750wtq the last time i had my car out. use your imagination to figure out the HP in that.
Do you have customers whose issues were fixed with Xona Series Ball Bearing CHRA FP Turbos? I had no issues with 100% stock ventilation until I switched to this turbo. So far the 5/8 line to the intake hasn't remedied the oil burning.

Last edited by XSivPSI; Mar 8, 2016 at 08:36 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 09:16 AM
  #1283  
3gturbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 571
Likes: 8
From: Charlotte
i didnt modify my valve cover yet I just run my egr as a vent also to the catch can and use the turbo to help pull the pressure out of the engine I have a 5/8 line ran to the intake before the turbo going to the catch can seems to work well car uses about 200ml per tank of gas not too bad. Same as its been since I first built the engine.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 11:16 AM
  #1284  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 76
From: Riverview, FL
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
I really like the STM sealed catch can setup, and I may switch to it, or build something similar to it. It allows both valve cover ports to vent to the intake pipe when there is no vacuum in the IM, but it has a PCV valve that opens when the IM has vacuum.
Just installed mine recently. VERY tight fit if you still have the stock radiator/fan. I'll try and snap a pic in the next few days.

Any smoking my car had have disappeared. Will be able to tell reduced oil consumption after some mileage (did a fresh oil change at the same time). Will also get a better gauge once I get retuned at English in the next week or two (hopefully).
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 12:33 PM
  #1285  
dr_latino999's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Army
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 424
Likes: 18
From: Central TX
Originally Posted by tscompusa
You guys are hiding an actual problem with your setup if you have to use 3 huge ports to remove the issue. a single 5/8 hole on the driver side fixed my car and many others 100%, and i make almost double the power then most people on here with issues. 750wtq the last time i had my car out. use your imagination to figure out the HP in that.
I did state - COMPLETELY over kill. I'm the kind of person to do it once, and that's it. There is no iterative design here At 505 minor ftlbs, I was burning Oil like a Kuwaiti oil field circa Gulf War. Once I went for my solution, I haven't burned hardly a drop. Now, could your way work for everyone? Maybe. Most Likely. But dealing with the frustration that is the FP Center Housing....well....overkill appears.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2016 | 07:25 AM
  #1286  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by XSivPSI
Do you have customers whose issues were fixed with Xona Series Ball Bearing CHRA FP Turbos? I had no issues with 100% stock ventilation until I switched to this turbo. So far the 5/8 line to the intake hasn't remedied the oil burning.
No not with those specific line of turbos.

Originally Posted by dr_latino999
I did state - COMPLETELY over kill. I'm the kind of person to do it once, and that's it. There is no iterative design here At 505 minor ftlbs, I was burning Oil like a Kuwaiti oil field circa Gulf War. Once I went for my solution, I haven't burned hardly a drop. Now, could your way work for everyone? Maybe. Most Likely. But dealing with the frustration that is the FP Center Housing....well....overkill appears.
Yes thats why I commented. You had to do it because of the turbo. Im glad you know that yourself and I didnt have to say it.

In reality I believe you're patching an actual design flaw though, but if its working let it do its job! Def no downside to relieving to much pressure as long as oil isnt coming out with it!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2016 | 06:03 AM
  #1287  
XSivPSI's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 27
From: Huntsville, AL
Originally Posted by dr_latino999
I did state - COMPLETELY over kill. I'm the kind of person to do it once, and that's it. There is no iterative design here At 505 minor ftlbs, I was burning Oil like a Kuwaiti oil field circa Gulf War. Once I went for my solution, I haven't burned hardly a drop. Now, could your way work for everyone? Maybe. Most Likely. But dealing with the frustration that is the FP Center Housing....well....overkill appears.
How did you end up routing your 3 vent lines? Did you VTA any? All to intake pipe for vacuum under boost? a combination? I'm assuming 1 from the original PCV port and one from each cam hump on the driver side of the VC? Do you get much oil out of the intake cam one or the pcv location?

If anyone cares, I called FP and asked about the purple 0.020" restrictor hoping it might be suggested for people burning oil with their bb turbos but they said its for people that have higher than normal oil pressure due to removing balance shafts on 4g63s. Also usually for GTRs for whatever reasons, I didn't ask.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2016 | 09:20 AM
  #1288  
dr_latino999's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Army
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 424
Likes: 18
From: Central TX
Originally Posted by XSivPSI
How did you end up routing your 3 vent lines? Did you VTA any? All to intake pipe for vacuum under boost? a combination? I'm assuming 1 from the original PCV port and one from each cam hump on the driver side of the VC? Do you get much oil out of the intake cam one or the pcv location?
Built this diagram, the arrow directions indicate pressure flow. If I screwed anything up, I blame my lack of coffee. I'll take some pictures when I get home tonight and post it up.

Version 1

Version 2
Name:  1qydEBm.png
Views: 0
Size:  94.5 KB

I collect more oil/water vapor (E85) out of the PCV Location, it sees up to 22.7 psi of vacuum as I drive around town. The cam side collects its fair share of vapor itself. If I were to quantify a ratio, 4:1 output - PCV:Cam.

If anyone cares, I called FP and asked about the purple 0.020" restrictor hoping it might be suggested for people burning oil with their bb turbos but they said its for people that have higher than normal oil pressure due to removing balance shafts on 4g63s. Also usually for GTRs for whatever reasons, I didn't ask.
I had tested out a 0.026" and 0.024" restrictors, but it required three additional fittings in addition to the oil filter housing. I'm going to give this guy a shot to minimize the number of leak spots.

Last edited by dr_latino999; Mar 10, 2016 at 10:37 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2016 | 09:22 AM
  #1289  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
The 2x 10an on side aren't helping any more than a single 10an since they tee into a single 10an line anyways.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2016 | 09:52 AM
  #1290  
XSivPSI's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 27
From: Huntsville, AL
Originally Posted by dr_latino999
Built this diagram, the arrow directions indicate pressure flow. If I screwed anything up, I blame my lack of coffee. I'll take some pictures when I get home tonight and post it up.

https://i.imgur.com/vYGMncL.png?1

I collect more oil/water vapor (E85) out of the PCV Location, it sees up to 22.7 psi of vacuum as I drive around town. The cam side collects its fair share of vapor itself. If I were to quantify a ratio, 4:1 output - PCV:Cam.



I had tested out a 0.026" and 0.024" restrictors, but it required three additional fittings in addition to the oil filter housing. I'm going to give this guy a shot to minimize the number of leak spots.
Thanks for taking the time to make a diagram. So your bottlenecks are a single -10 an to the turbo intake and the OEM PCV line(?) to the intake manifold +8mm VTA when the IM is in vacuum and under boost you just lose the port to the intake manifold which could be made up by the 8mm VTA, if I'm following that correctly.

Is there an advantage to having the two side valve cover lines when they just Tee into a single -10 over just having a single -10 from the front port straight to the turbo intake?

If you get 1/4th the oil from the rear VC side port I think I'll just drill another port there instead of messing with the PCV port for now and leave that hooked up as stock. I'll just duplicate what I did for the front VC sideport, on the rear and add another fitting to my turbo intake.

my VC and inlet pipe are going to look like swiss cheese... and the engine bay, a bowl of spaghetti...

Last edited by XSivPSI; Mar 10, 2016 at 11:13 AM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:08 PM.