Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 motors / strokers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:23 AM
  #16  
lbcevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 392
Likes: 2
From: Sherman Oaks, CA
Saw a test that showed Cometic gasket had poor sealing quality. Get the Cosworth gasket, or stock. Cosworth has great sealing and construction.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:33 AM
  #17  
wreckless969's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 1
From: Fort Riley, KS
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
8700 on a long rod. My rev limit and Mikeys have bee 8691 since we put them together. Turbo and valve springs go a long way. 8500 has been the 2.3 (1.5 R/s) forever, like since DSM days of long ago. The GSR is 1.58 and turns far higher than we do. This has been well discussed in other threads like the "to stroke or not to stroke" thread thats not longer stickied.
I read the actually document on it when I was looking to stroke my car back in April but I don't recall it having the 2.4 in it.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:42 AM
  #18  
still*boostn's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
I rev my 2.4 to 8K all day 'er day.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 02:11 PM
  #19  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by wreckless969
I like the 2.4 but as a personal thing there are just 2 things I can't get around.

1 No oil squirters
That's easily remedied
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 02:19 PM
  #20  
KarmaSRT's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: ****sburg
A 2.3 or a 2.4 is what you need if you want the most power but non streetable go with a 2.1 badest one out right now i want to go with a 2.3 because i can still drive it on the streets and still make 700 plus
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #21  
RockmanX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 4
From: Louisiana
with a stroker motor you will make a ton of power under that rpm limit no real need to rev that high with a stroker vs a standard 2.0. Im sorry to the above poster but 2.4 are waaaaaaaaaaaaay more popular and gaining. Cant go wrong with a stroker
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 02:54 PM
  #22  
Yamahar1's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 275
Likes: 3
From: wichita ks
I have no problems with my 2.0......Thanks Aaron! I drive mine everyday.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 03:01 PM
  #23  
Jarrett 03's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: NJ
f that go with a 2.6 lol
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #24  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
My favorite street engine is by far our 2.3. I've built all of them but the 2.2's, driven all of them, raced and tuned. If you have a good core and it sounds like you do, the 2.3 is what I'd recommend.

I advertise 8500 rpm redline for our 2.3's. I have not had a single rpm related failure with that rev limit. If you search for Alan Szabo on here he has our 2.3 in his car, it's gone 9's in two different EVO's he owns and has been together for at least 3 years, he runs it to about 9300 rpm. John Shepherd also runs our stroker, he won the shootout this year running consistent 9.60's, it's been in the car for 2-3 years and is also being rev'd beyond what I recommend.

I am building a '32 Ford coupe, it is getting our 2.3 in it.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 03:27 PM
  #25  
RockmanX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 4
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by Jarrett 03
f that go with a 2.6 lol
you first brian crowler parts here you come good luck to you sir
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #26  
ta ace's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: wichita, KS
Originally Posted by Yamahar1
I have no problems with my 2.0......Thanks Aaron! I drive mine everyday.
haha i fig if im going in to build the bottom end might as well stroke it too.. 2.3 kits are not very exspensive.. plenty of winter time
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 03:34 PM
  #27  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
I've always wondered how long those really last. I guess you can beat any engine to death if you hammer on them long enough, but it just seemed like the life of the average 2.4 (DSM or Evo) wasn't very long. I'd have to think that most people kind of did it the budget way instead of the more exotic ($$$) versions you can get from the top name builders. I really would like a 2.2L or 2.4LR in my Evo, but imagine a 2.3L is more in my budget when the time comes. I'd love to have a 2.1L for maximum revs in my GS-T.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 03:38 PM
  #28  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
Originally Posted by GPTourer
I've always wondered how long those really last. I guess you can beat any engine to death if you hammer on them long enough, but it just seemed like the life of the average 2.4 (DSM or Evo) wasn't very long. I'd have to think that most people kind of did it the budget way instead of the more exotic ($$$) versions you can get from the top name builders. I really would like a 2.2L or 2.4LR in my Evo, but imagine a 2.3L is more in my budget when the time comes. I'd love to have a 2.1L for maximum revs in my GS-T.
thats my concern. a lot of people rev 2.3's and 2.4's up over 8,500 and assume that its fine because nothing breaks. im curious how many miles these motors actually have on them and how abused they actually are. either way, they are going to wear faster than a shorter stroke motor.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 05:19 PM
  #29  
wreckless969's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 1
From: Fort Riley, KS
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
My favorite street engine is by far our 2.3. I've built all of them but the 2.2's, driven all of them, raced and tuned. If you have a good core and it sounds like you do, the 2.3 is what I'd recommend.

I advertise 8500 rpm redline for our 2.3's. I have not had a single rpm related failure with that rev limit. If you search for Alan Szabo on here he has our 2.3 in his car, it's gone 9's in two different EVO's he owns and has been together for at least 3 years, he runs it to about 9300 rpm. John Shepherd also runs our stroker, he won the shootout this year running consistent 9.60's, it's been in the car for 2-3 years and is also being rev'd beyond what I recommend.

I am building a '32 Ford coupe, it is getting our 2.3 in it.
Oh it's a 8500 redline, my bad I have taken over 8k honestly. Its got so much low end and I still havent gotten used to driving it I find myself shifting at my old shift point. Have yet to hit hte rev limiter.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 05:21 PM
  #30  
wreckless969's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 1
From: Fort Riley, KS
Originally Posted by n2oiroc
thats my concern. a lot of people rev 2.3's and 2.4's up over 8,500 and assume that its fine because nothing breaks. im curious how many miles these motors actually have on them and how abused they actually are. either way, they are going to wear faster than a shorter stroke motor.
If your engine dies because of sidewall wear then I would say you are doing pretty good and got the full life outta that motor.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 AM.