Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 motors / strokers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 09:01 AM
  #1  
ta ace's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: wichita, KS
2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 motors / strokers

what to put in the evo this winter...


stroker kit or whole assy.???

currently running mods in sig... looking for 600+ horse mainy street driven and some track (1/4)


open to any and all advice winter just started!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 09:11 AM
  #2  
Tribal's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 660
Likes: 1
From: Austin TX
mostly street I would say go with the 2.3
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 09:31 AM
  #3  
2003lancerevo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: IL
I would probably have to say a built 2.4
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 09:37 AM
  #4  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
I have owned all of them but the 2.1. I like my 2.4 for easy street power. The 2.2 was good for the part of me that wants a bike motor in my car. Austin needs to hammer some Subes
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 09:51 AM
  #5  
ta ace's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: wichita, KS
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
I have owned all of them but the 2.1. I like my 2.4 for easy street power. The 2.2 was good for the part of me that wants a bike motor in my car. Austin needs to hammer some Subes
LEANING TOWARDS 2.3l lol

2.4 seems a lil much? but then again i want to keep the fp red maybe switch to black later..

2.3 stroker kit
twin disc clutch
double pumper and bigger injectors?
cometic head gasket

anything else you think would be needed?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 09:57 AM
  #6  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
2.4 is the best way to keep downtime to a minimum and allows for a LR 100mm stroke vs the 2,3 being limited by max rpm.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 09:57 AM
  #7  
NOMIEZVR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 560
Likes: 41
From: Chitown
why not just get a 2.0L and higher revs? I wanted to go stroker but lately ive been thinking why not just get a built 2.0 and rev to like 9.5K. With a fpred you will hit full boost around 4k but can go up to 9.5k.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 10:04 AM
  #8  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
It all depends on personal preference, but we have been selling mostly 2.4l variations based on the affordability of the cores and the upsides of increased displacement in a daily driver. If you're worried about revs you could even go with a long rod 2.4l and find yourself in a best of both worlds scenario I would love to help you out whatever route you decide to go!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 10:13 AM
  #9  
wreckless969's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 1
From: Fort Riley, KS
What are these 2.4s spinning to. My 2.3 spinds to a healthy 8.3k so I wouldnt say the 2.3 is gimped on revs.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 10:13 AM
  #10  
evo 9 guy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 357
Likes: 1
From: California
Originally Posted by wreckless969
what are these 2.4s spinning to. My 2.3 spinds to a healthy 8.3k so i wouldnt say the 2.3 is gimped on revs.
+1
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:15 AM
  #11  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
8700, there is one I can think of that is north of 9200.

aaron
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #12  
wreckless969's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 1
From: Fort Riley, KS
8700 is the standard?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #13  
NOMIEZVR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 560
Likes: 41
From: Chitown
WOW! I was always under the impression that 2.4l would only go to 7k. 8700rpm is damn good.
Now is that on a long rod?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:22 AM
  #14  
wreckless969's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 1
From: Fort Riley, KS
I like the 2.4 but as a personal thing there are just 2 things I can't get around.

1 No oil squirters

2 I just dont like the idea of having a Galant block. Pure Evo engine for me.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2010 | 11:22 AM
  #15  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
8700 on a long rod. My rev limit and Mikeys have bee 8691 since we put them together. Turbo and valve springs go a long way. 8500 has been the 2.3 (1.5 R/s) forever, like since DSM days of long ago. The GSR is 1.58 and turns far higher than we do. This has been well discussed in other threads like the "to stroke or not to stroke" thread thats not longer stickied.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:51 AM.