Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Evo 8 with MAP EF2.5

Old Mar 31, 2013 | 11:48 AM
  #121  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
OP: In your modlist you have a 3" BR "catback" exhaust listed. So, sre you running a catalytic convertor, or a test pipe?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 11:50 AM
  #122  
evotuner04's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year MemberLikedLoved
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 937
Likes: 5
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by sparky
OP: In your modlist you have a 3" BR "catback" exhaust listed. So, sre you running a catalytic convertor, or a test pipe?
Its been hollowed out theres nothing in there (high flow cat, now just straight through haha)
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 12:41 PM
  #123  
evotuner04's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year MemberLikedLoved
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 937
Likes: 5
From: Minnesota
Ive also thought of just throwing my stock exhaust manifold back on and see if that will help spool any. I'm not sold on these aftermarket ones unless making big power
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 03:31 AM
  #124  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by evotuner04
Ive... thought of....throwing my stock exhaust manifold....on and see if that will help spool any......
Your manifold is not the problem. Neither is the grind on your Kelford cams the problem. You are barking up the wrong tree. The turbo can be made to spool faster by merely increasing the spring tension on the wastegate flapper valve. To increase spring tension you will need to adjust the length of the threaded actuator rod on your Turbosmart actuator.

I don't agree with your tuner that preload was checked and is "fine" and is not the problem. Or that your EBC alone determines all boost parameters on your turbo without regard to spring pressure.

Likewise MAP telling you that it makes no difference and has no bearing which pressure of spring is fitted inside your actuator. If the spring was of no import then Turbosmart would not offer different pressures of springs for their actuator.

I maintain that your slow boost problem is probably actuator related. There is insufficient spring tension being exerted on the flapper valve. You first need to temporarily disconnect the EBC and run the actuator straight off the compressor's boost signal port. This way we establish what spring pressure actually is. We do not rely on your tuner's saying that he checked preload and that it is "fine".

Last edited by sparky; Apr 1, 2013 at 03:36 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 05:43 AM
  #125  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by evotuner04
Ive... thought of....throwing my stock exhaust manifold....on and see if that will help spool any......
Your manifold is not the problem. Neither is the grind on your Kelford cams the problem. You are barking up the wrong tree. The turbo can be made to spool faster by merely increasing the spring tension on the wastegate flapper valve.

I disagree with your tuner's assurance that preload was "checked "and is "fine" and is not a probable cause of lag. I also disagree that your EBC alone determines all boost parameters on your turbo without regard to spring pressure. He is just talking through his hat.

Likewise MAP telling you that it makes no difference and has no bearing on turbo spoolup as to which pressure of spring is fitted inside your actuator. If the spring was of no import then Turbosmart would not offer different rates of interchangeable actuator springs for their actuator.

I still maintain that your slow boost problem is actuator related. There is insufficient spring tension being exerted on the flapper valve. You first need to temporarily disconnect the EBC and run the actuator straight off the compressor's boost signal port. This way we will establish an exact baseline for comparison and as a starting point for preload adjustment.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 06:06 AM
  #126  
Craig King's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: NW Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by evotuner04
Heres my EF3 graph with no boost leak a year ago


Perhaps I missed it... but was this on 93oct?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 10:35 AM
  #127  
evotuner04's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year MemberLikedLoved
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 937
Likes: 5
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by sparky
Your manifold is not the problem. Neither is the grind on your Kelford cams the problem. You are barking up the wrong tree. The turbo can be made to spool faster by merely increasing the spring tension on the wastegate flapper valve.

I disagree with your tuner's assurance that preload was "checked "and is "fine" and is not a probable cause of lag. I also disagree that your EBC alone determines all boost parameters on your turbo without regard to spring pressure. He is just talking through his hat.

Likewise MAP telling you that it makes no difference and has no bearing on turbo spoolup as to which pressure of spring is fitted inside your actuator. If the spring was of no import then Turbosmart would not offer different rates of interchangeable actuator springs for their actuator.

I still maintain that your slow boost problem is actuator related. There is insufficient spring tension being exerted on the flapper valve. You first need to temporarily disconnect the EBC and run the actuator straight off the compressor's boost signal port. This way we will establish an exact baseline for comparison and as a starting point for preload adjustment.
Thanks for the pointers sir. I'm going to try and get MAP on this later this week or next.

Originally Posted by Craig King
Perhaps I missed it... but was this on 93oct?
Noooo. E85. Arent many stock blocks making that kind of power on a mustang dyno
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 01:50 PM
  #128  
Craig King's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: NW Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by evotuner04
Noooo. E85. Arent many stock blocks making that kind of power on a mustang dyno

Not many stock blocks making 425hp on a MustangDyno ??????
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 01:56 PM
  #129  
DisgustipatedM3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by sparky
Your manifold is not the problem. Neither is the grind on your Kelford cams the problem. You are barking up the wrong tree. The turbo can be made to spool faster by merely increasing the spring tension on the wastegate flapper valve. To increase spring tension you will need to adjust the length of the threaded actuator rod on your Turbosmart actuator.

I don't agree with your tuner that preload was checked and is "fine" and is not the problem. Or that your EBC alone determines all boost parameters on your turbo without regard to spring pressure.

Likewise MAP telling you that it makes no difference and has no bearing which pressure of spring is fitted inside your actuator. If the spring was of no import then Turbosmart would not offer different pressures of springs for their actuator.

I maintain that your slow boost problem is probably actuator related. There is insufficient spring tension being exerted on the flapper valve. You first need to temporarily disconnect the EBC and run the actuator straight off the compressor's boost signal port. This way we establish what spring pressure actually is. We do not rely on your tuner's saying that he checked preload and that it is "fine".
I told him this as soon as I saw the spool when he texted me the cell phone pic. Glad to know I wasn't too off-base. Also reassures me that taking my Turbosmart, putting in the extra spring to make it 23 psi, and messing with the preload on it when I install my EF2.5 this weekend is the right thing to do straight out of the gate.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 03:33 PM
  #130  
evotuner04's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year MemberLikedLoved
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 937
Likes: 5
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Craig King
Not many stock blocks making 425hp on a MustangDyno ??????
Not on pump gas in MN
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 04:57 PM
  #131  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Yeah, I like the idea of running the 22-24# extra spring in your MAP/Turbosmart WGA. Especially since the OP is going to be boosting 30+ PSI peak pressure.

At just 25# manifold boost pressure, the exhaust pressure inside the turbine housing exceeds boost pressure by a 2:1 ratio. So, at 25# boost there are 50 PSI hitting the flapper valve and forcing it up off its seat.

The only force pulling the flapper down are the 18 PSI of the WGA spring. This is w/o any additional preload. At 18# the actuator reaches equilibrium and the rod starts to move the flapper. So, any boost pressure above 18# combines with the 36# of exhaust pressure to open the flapper valve.

So, above 18# boost you add each additional PSI over 18# to the exhaust pressure. Therefore, for example, at 22# boost you add 3#(boost) at the diaphragm to 44# (exhaust) at the flapper valve face for a total of 47# lifting force acting on the flapper.

The EBC/solenoid may be masking or diverting the boost signal from reaching the diaphragm but it is powerless to counteract the exhaust pressure lifting the flapper after the 18# of tension of the actuator spring has been exceeded by exhaust pressure. The EBC only diverts the boost signal from acting on the WGA diaphragm. However, the EBC has no effect on or control whatsoever over the lifting force of the exhaust pressure acting on the face of the flapper. That's just the way it works.

Last edited by sparky; Apr 1, 2013 at 06:33 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 06:35 PM
  #132  
Hi Im Vinh's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Houston,Tx
Originally Posted by sparky
Yeah, I like the idea of running the 22-24# extra spring in your MAP/Turbosmart WGA. Especially since the OP is going to be boosting 30+ PSI peak pressure.

At just 25# manifold boost pressure, the exhaust pressure inside the turbine housing exceeds boost pressure by a 2:1 ratio. So, at 25# boost there are 50 PSI hitting the flapper valve and forcing it up off its seat.

The only force pulling the flapper down are the 18 PSI of the WGA spring. This is w/o any additional preload. At 18# the actuator reaches equilibrium and the rod starts to move the flapper. So, any boost pressure above 18# combines with the 36# of exhaust pressure to open the flapper valve.

So, above 18# boost you add each additional PSI over 18# to the exhaust pressure. Therefore, for example, at 22# boost you add 3#(boost) at the diaphragm to 44# (exhaust) at the flapper valve face for a total of 47# lifting force acting on the flapper.

The EBC/solenoid may be masking or diverting the boost signal from reaching the diaphragm but it is powerless to counteract the exhaust pressure lifting the flapper after the 18# of tension of the actuator spring has been exceeded by exhaust pressure. The EBC only diverts the boost signal from acting on the WGA diaphragm. However, the EBC has no effect on or control whatsoever over the lifting force of the exhaust pressure acting on the face of the flapper. That's just the way it works.
You , my friend, know your stuff about WG adjustments . I myself am planning on running a EF2.5 at 25-27# and was wondering what's your advice on the spring selection. Keep with the 18psi spring and give it good amount of preload or go with the 23psi spring? Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 09:42 PM
  #133  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
I have never used the turbosmart actuator. So, I may not be the best indicated at dispensing advice. But, since you will be running 25-27# peak, then I would probably go with the 18# spring.

I always approach WGA adjustment and initial setting of spring pressure carefully. Each setup is a little different. The OP is downsizing turbos from an EF3 to the EF 2.5, whereas you will be upsizing from the EF2 to the 2.5.

He will be running 32 PSI peak while you will be keeping boost in the 25-27# range. For you at least, I would say run the 18# spring and adjust spring pressure up to about 21-23#. Then let your boost control device control the narrow range above spring pressure ttto the peak level.

I personally prefer a lighter actuator spring that is heavily preloaded to a heavier spring with little to no preload. So, in your case I would rather do the 18# spring and preload it up to 22-23# for your 27# peak, than I would the 25# spring with little to no preload. Just my .02
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2013 | 07:56 AM
  #134  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
I am wondering about the differences in turbine wheel major and minor diameters on the EF2, EF2.5, and EF3 turbos. Maybe someone can clear up the wheel differences for me. For example, does the 2.5 combine the comp wheel from the EF3 with the turbine wheel of the EF2? Do the EF3 and the EF2 share neither turbine nor compressor wheels?

Is the lowest pressure spring available in the MAP/turbosmart IX WGA , a 16#, or an 18# spring, or is it sometimes refered to as a 16-18# spring. Thus there is actually only one spring but some refer to it as 16#, whereas others refer to it as a 18# spring? Just trying to get things straight, thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2013 | 08:25 PM
  #135  
Craig King's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: NW Pennsylvania
Sparky - I'm planning to install my EF3 soon. I'm going to be running 93oct on a stock block. This is going on my daily driver... I was thinking 24-25psi for normal driving? What kind of wastegate tension and settings should I try? I am running a Hallman MBC. My EF3 has the turbosmart actuator.

What are you suggestions?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:47 AM.