Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

What cams are you running on 2.4LR?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 11:04 AM
  #1  
jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
What cams are you running on 2.4LR?

Im curious to see which cams everyones using on their 2.4LR's.

Why did you choose the cam and what turbo did you choose in conjuncture with it?

I have a 6466TZ going to a 2.4LR but still have undecided which cam to follow through upon. GSC S2 would be my first viable option as far as drive-ability goes.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 11:16 AM
  #2  
_des_'s Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (57)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 394
Likes: 4
From: Mobile AL
2.4LR, GSC r2 cams, FP zero.
They make alot of low end power. My tuner assumed I was using GSC s3 cams because the peak power numbers. I would have picked up 10-20 whp but Id lose all the low end the the r2's provide.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 12:53 PM
  #3  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
For "smaller" turbos like the Red, the R2's are a good choice. If you're trying to maximize top-end gains, the S3's are the way to go.

I will be running the R2's on my FP Red and 2.3
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 02:52 PM
  #4  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
I enjoyed the r2's on my 2.4, i used them with a 6766 and they worked great.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 05:02 PM
  #5  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
I would use the R2's, the extra lift helps with the extra displacement of the 2.4, and the duration is a touch shorter to bring the power a bit to the left, which is where you want it for a 2.4 since you're not revving it to 9500

Last edited by letsgetthisdone; Sep 14, 2015 at 05:36 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 05:30 PM
  #6  
jb_boostin's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Northwest Indiana
I'm going with s3's on my 2.3. Like letsgetthisdone said, the extra lift from bigger cams really helps clean the cylinder out with fresh air quicker. Gotta think, 2.3/2.4 motors flow 15-20% more air. Gotta help move that somehow!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 08:19 PM
  #7  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
When it comes to valve lift, both sides of a factory head are finished by ~10.5mm. The limitations of a factory head become even more constraining with 20% more displacement. Only a competently ported head can take advantage of increased lift. By 12.5mm, my CNC intake port outflows a factory port by about 20%, which is substantial.

The GSC R2 has nominally faster ramp rates. This, not lift, is what tends to sharpen low speed and midrange performance.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 08:16 AM
  #8  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
What cams are you running on 2.4LR?

When a cam has more lift, and a shorter duration than other cams, one would assume it has faster ramp rates...
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 08:25 AM
  #9  
jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
So you guys are favoring the R2 < S2 on the LR?

The S3's are just overkill for my power range. I drive the car in winters as well so the cold start would be hell. Especially with an AEM EMS, the car tries its hardest not to start. 600WHP on a Mustang would be ideal. I'm just curious as to which turbo platform everyone is using with their cams for the Long Rod setups.

You can also use the same clutch/pressure plate/flywheel/etc. off of the 63 and directly swap it to the 64, correct?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 08:26 AM
  #10  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Look at advertised duration vs. effective duration. As compared to the S3, the R2 has 6 degrees less advertised duration, but only 2 degrees less effective (@1mm) duration. That gives some indication to the ramp rates. A JUN 272 delivers very good performance not because it is a high lift set (10.8mm), but because its ramp rates deliver 235 degrees of effective duration with 272 degrees of advertised duration, similar to the GSC R2. The R2 has more lift, but again, that is a moot point with a factory head.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 08:37 AM
  #11  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by jake33
I'm just curious as to which turbo platform everyone is using with their cams for the Long Rod setups.
The turbo platform that best fits your particular application is the smallest one that will get you where you want to be, regardless of displacement or rod length. That decision comes first. What cam set represents the best compromise for your application comes afterward, and depends somewhat upon you other choices and expected usage.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 08:47 AM
  #12  
jake33's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Thanks for explanation Ted.

I would hate to mate a turbo too large for the engine and not get the most potential out of it relative to the wasted RPM's.

Is the T4 frame overkill on the 2.4LR for the specified power range?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 09:01 AM
  #13  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
600whp on a Mustang is T3/T4 territory.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 09:06 PM
  #14  
AreSTG's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 951
Likes: 1
From: PA/NC
2.4LR, 6466TZ.

I run S3's. If you're not building a racecar the R2 is probably well suited for you. As far as on kill, especially with the smaller turbos like blacks and reds... fml, you are asking for trouble. Ask my last 5 transmissions...

But honestly, if you are rocking a 2.4 and are hurting for "low end", you're driving the wrong car. get a V8. going from a 2.0 to a 2.3/2.4 is such a change in driveability it's insane. you can just putt away from a stop off the idle.

I do rev well over 9,000, and i'm happier doing that on the S3 than the R2, not that I have a bunch of science to to quote why I'm better off...
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2015 | 06:28 PM
  #15  
EvolutionIXMR06's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Army
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
On my 2.4LR w/ mivec setup I'm running Kelford 272's w/ a GT35r. I originally had a bbk but never had the chance to try it. I'm breaking it in right now and don't really have a feel for the max potential.

Last edited by EvolutionIXMR06; Sep 16, 2015 at 06:44 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
78
Feb 17, 2017 11:45 AM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
33
Oct 17, 2015 12:03 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
11
May 3, 2014 03:54 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
34
Jul 24, 2012 10:44 AM
Gruppe-S
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
18
Oct 23, 2006 11:10 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:50 AM.