RnR 2.4 EVO 8
Originally Posted by RnR Racing
rdrkt, I have read a lot about your car in the past on various boards. I believe you are using an FP3065 which is similar to our turbo set up. Main difference is the turbine housing size and equal length manifold vs. ported cast. Even 126mph is crazy on pump.Something that probably would never be capable of an a stock ECU. Do you have any recent pics of your car? I would love to see some pics.
We are hoping for full boost around mid 3,000rpm. We will see once we get the EMS on there and fully tuned.I just like the fact that on my daily driver I can run a large turbo and not had to worry about it effecting driveability.
We are hoping for full boost around mid 3,000rpm. We will see once we get the EMS on there and fully tuned.I just like the fact that on my daily driver I can run a large turbo and not had to worry about it effecting driveability.
Wow Ryan, great work on the motor. It will be interesting to see how she performs. I think it's safe to say that you have to biggest motor in an EVO stateside.
I noticed a couple of people on here were concerned about RNR's quality. RnR will go to great lengths to fix any issue that you may have. I had a few problems with them in the past, but he fixed them all for me. Hell, he built me a brand new exhaust and installed it for free!!!!!!
Keep up the great work Ryan.
I noticed a couple of people on here were concerned about RNR's quality. RnR will go to great lengths to fix any issue that you may have. I had a few problems with them in the past, but he fixed them all for me. Hell, he built me a brand new exhaust and installed it for free!!!!!!
Keep up the great work Ryan.
Ok, low 11's and high 10's on 93 is amazing. Now the real question is, how does it do on C16? Anyone over 500whp? (in a street car, no air/water IC's)
This is actuallly interesting. Unfortunately, I won't have any money until the end of the summer.
This is actuallly interesting. Unfortunately, I won't have any money until the end of the summer.
Originally Posted by RnR Racing
rdrkt, I have read a lot about your car in the past on various boards. I believe you are using an FP3065 which is similar to our turbo set up. Main difference is the turbine housing size and equal length manifold vs. ported cast.
Its a GT40 compressor T350 turbine wheel and an .82 5 bolt turbine housing connected to a turbonetics manifold.
Originally Posted by RnR Racing
Do you have any recent pics of your car? I would love to see some pics.
http://www.rdrkt.com/images/talon/noxme.jpg
http://www.rdrkt.com/images/galant/fronts34.jpg
Originally Posted by RnR Racing
We will see once we get the EMS on there and fully tuned.I just like the fact that on my daily driver I can run a large turbo and not had to worry about it effecting driveability.
Originally Posted by metaphysical
Ok, low 11's and high 10's on 93 is amazing. Now the real question is, how does it do on C16? Anyone over 500whp? (in a street car, no air/water IC's)
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
Ryan, while we can appreciate your enthusiasm for bringing a new product to the evo8 market. Do you think you could be a little more realistic on your claims? The 2.4 stroker is nothing new to the DSM seen. I have built a half dozen stroker motors myself. I have seen the before and after affect on turbo spool. In short the strokers spool the turbo about 3-400rpm faster.
Switching from .63 to an .82 slows spool about 4-500rpm.
Can anyone do the math here?
Switching from .63 to an .82 slows spool about 4-500rpm.
Can anyone do the math here?
RNR, so which 2.4L block are you using if your not using the galant bottom?
Also, I have heard of two instances where Eagle Rods, have uhm Broke....from a very reliable source. Have you had any issues, and have you fully tested this?
Also, I have heard of two instances where Eagle Rods, have uhm Broke....from a very reliable source. Have you had any issues, and have you fully tested this?
I think I recall seeing it was a late model Eclipse block (3gen body style??) not sure where I saw that..
I'm surprised that you've heard that about eagle rods, the truth is under severe duty, any rod can stretch or break, its important that if you want to spin an engine that high, you magnaflux, deburr, and stress relieve (Cryo freeze, etc.) the parts to minimize the chance of a small defect getting into the mix.. My Malibu has rods and a stroker crank from eagle, the car is supercharged with 9:1 compression and regularly sees 10psi of boost. Its all about the attention and prep...
I think anyone who has a new innovative product is going to have disbelievers, and time will tell if this is a viable option, but someone has to try it. I'm more than willing if my funds permit.. I think for a daily driver with serious performance, a stroker engine and a matched turbo will prove to be much more enjoyable to drive, and in many cases perform better than a high strung engine with a giant turbo that spools real late. It would be interesting to see what this engine will do with a nicely ported head, 272 cams, and an "Upgrade Stock" twin scroll turbo.
I'm surprised that you've heard that about eagle rods, the truth is under severe duty, any rod can stretch or break, its important that if you want to spin an engine that high, you magnaflux, deburr, and stress relieve (Cryo freeze, etc.) the parts to minimize the chance of a small defect getting into the mix.. My Malibu has rods and a stroker crank from eagle, the car is supercharged with 9:1 compression and regularly sees 10psi of boost. Its all about the attention and prep...
I think anyone who has a new innovative product is going to have disbelievers, and time will tell if this is a viable option, but someone has to try it. I'm more than willing if my funds permit.. I think for a daily driver with serious performance, a stroker engine and a matched turbo will prove to be much more enjoyable to drive, and in many cases perform better than a high strung engine with a giant turbo that spools real late. It would be interesting to see what this engine will do with a nicely ported head, 272 cams, and an "Upgrade Stock" twin scroll turbo.
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
...It would be interesting to see what this engine will do with a nicely ported head, 272 cams, and an "Upgrade Stock" twin scroll turbo.
Now your talkin'
Guys, I know I haven't been on here lately. I will reply to all the questions proabably tommorrow. I have been out of the shop for a while because my wife just had our first baby boy.




i had one