Magnuson-Moss Act no bar to binding arbitration.




http://goliath.ecnext.com/comsite5/b...id=0199-535374


Read threw it you have alot more rights than you thought.

 

Which part exactly covers Magnuson Moss protecting you when you squeeze more power of a drivetrain than it's supposed to output, or re-do the mapping on the ecu that their engineers had originally done?

 

^ They never investegated, nor gave him a reason, they just said "not covered under waranty". They have too at least investegate!

 

I certainly didn't gather that they didn't look into it at all, perhaps you should re-read stew's posts.

 

I think he said that right here! I mean unless im reading it wrong!

 

my post was about them looking more into it, then just a "ok, u got aftermarket pieces, denied".

 

More than the first post.

 

I read all of it, but still it proves what i said, no ivestigation was done. I dont get your point. seriously!

P.S. I'm gonna stop posting here, cause his original intent was to get advice from people who have been to arbitration, and i cant help cause i have not.

 

Uhm, they saw what was on the car and pulled the motor apart. Were you expecting something like you saw on CSI?

 

CSI, come on guy. Dont get ur painties in a bunch cause i dont agree with what ur saying. Again You nor I can help this man, so if u have issues pm me, or start your on thread about this!

 

OK I wont get my panties in a bunch and you stop making misinformed statements.

 

just stop making statements period, because I'n my eyes they didnt do a proper investegation period, and if i was him, i would do the same thing! And the are no misinformed comments here, just comments base uppon what I read in this thread! Good day.

 

So should they have fingerprinted the car as well?

 

hahahaha what would that have done silly?

 

What they did was pull the head off (ONLY the head) to look for reasons why the LOWER end of the motor broke. They looked at the clean piston TOPS and said "detonation". I said there was no detonation to me and had a few independant mechanics back me up. Why would you not AT LEAST pull the oil pan to see why a ROD broke? Then they claimed, "Well, maybe there was no detonation, but we're not covering it anyway."

Also, it was not the dealership techs that made the detonation claim OR instructed what to be torn down, it was the district representative, who is not technical at all. They basically just pulled a few pieces off the motor so it would be enough for the average joe to assume their conclusion wasn't 100% made up.

There was obviously no ACTUAL attempt at a diagnosis.