Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central
View Poll Results: Choose which ones will influence your decision
Wow, 300hp, 300 ft-lbs from 2.5L Subaru boxer engine
152
22.25%
Proven tuning potential of the Mitsubishi 4G63
355
51.98%
Subaru\'s strong 6-speed manual tranny
138
20.20%
Mitsubishi\'s dependable 5-speed tranny
109
15.96%
DCCD on the STi... wish Evo had ACD
132
19.33%
Stock FMIC on the Evo
164
24.01%
Exterior looks
305
44.66%
Interior quality
148
21.67%
Gross Vehicle Weight
79
11.57%
I want to test drive both before deciding
165
24.16%
Price
261
38.21%
Body Shell Rigidity
133
19.47%
Brakes
163
23.87%
0 - 60 mph and 1/4 mile times
201
29.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 683. You may not vote on this poll

Evo vs. STI | Anything and Everything [ALL THREADS MERGED]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 12:07 PM
  #2236  
infin|ty's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Re: Re: Evo vs STi, Part 2

Originally posted by boostCreep

maybe he was thinking ohh crap i hope he dosnt screw up this $27k car...remember your clutch frying driving lessons are goin on in a car that will eventually be bought by some1...he has to look out for his product
This dealer has an Evo just for test drives. It has over 3k miles on it.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 12:18 PM
  #2237  
SilverEvo8owner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: dublin, oxford, chillicothe OH
Ok
i have both and heres my take

It really depends on what you want

I drive the evo daily and i have no problems at all. Its been modded since it had 1.8k on the clock (18500 right now) Modding the evo is so much easier and cheaper than the STi. Handling in the Sti is nothing like the evo. NOTHING! If you want the power of the Sti then use the money that you saved from buying the evo instead on mods. It should only take not much more than $500 to achieve this.

The Sti is very nice and is without a doubt much nicer than the evo. It is faster but again that can b fixed on the evo. But simple put, the evo has so much more potential than the Sti that its not even funny.

As for the ride, the Sti's really isnt much better. The suspension is actually stiffer and less forgiving than the evo. Its just that the seats soak up more than the evo's. Hitting bumps in the Sti will tire you to hell. Its really loud to drive on a highway with bumps. The evos seats support you so it doesnt seem as bad in the evo.

Insurance is cheaper on the evo too
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 12:43 PM
  #2238  
MYEVO8U's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Fred, VA
Good luck finding aftermarket speakers for the STI. My fiance has an '04 WRX and I ordered a pair of Alpine 4" speakers for the rear doors and they didn't fit. I ordered them from crutchfield so I called and they said they sold me the set that fits the '03 WRX and they said they would fit. Aparently the '04's have different speakers from the factory and Crutchfield has nothing that will fit directly in the rear doors. Not to mention from '02 and up WRX they don't have anything that will replace the front doors because of the depth clearance. It looks like you are stuck with the factory options for the STI.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 12:52 PM
  #2239  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Re: Evo vs STi, Part 2

Originally posted by infin|ty
I only stalled twice....

I had a hard time w/ 1st gear, the car would buck really badly, I think I was not giving it enough throttle. Horrible test drive, it was dark, I wasn't having much luck w/ the clutch and the salesman was a sissy. I'm going back on Thursday for a REAL test drive and one of their sales managers better be there cause I'm sick of getting stuck w/ someone who knows nothing about the car on test drives.
Sounds to me like you don't know how to drive. The saleman was probably nervous with you bucking around in first, stalling the car, and basically practicing your skills on a 30K piece of merchandise. So I guess its his fault because he didn't know anything about the car? He was probably too nervous worrying about you tearing up the car or having an accident with him in it.

This dealer has an Evo just for test drives. It has over 3k miles on it.
So? They will still have to sell it. Mitsubishi doesn't refund dealers who turn cars into demos. And if it gets torn up they'll have to pay to have it fix. Parts aren't free and mecahnics like to feed their families too.

You at least got to drive both of them, right? Doesn't that count for something?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 01:06 PM
  #2240  
mifesto's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 0
From: Princeton, NJ
wait you test drove and you only stalked twice? twice is twice too often my friend .. no wonder they are nervous that ur driving it.. so would i
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 01:09 PM
  #2241  
infin|ty's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Re: Re: Evo vs STi, Part 2

Originally posted by GPTourer


Sounds to me like you don't know how to drive. The saleman was probably nervous with you bucking around in first, stalling the car, and basically practicing your skills on a 30K piece of merchandise. So I guess its his fault because he didn't know anything about the car? He was probably too nervous worrying about you tearing up the car or having an accident with him in it.



So? They will still have to sell it. Mitsubishi doesn't refund dealers who turn cars into demos. And if it gets torn up they'll have to pay to have it fix. Parts aren't free and mecahnics like to feed their families too.

You at least got to drive both of them, right? Doesn't that count for something?
I already explained I am not good at driving a stick. Yes, it is his fault he knows nothing about the car. I don't know how my skill with a stick is related to knowledge of an automobile. Please call up my dealer and tell them not to let me drive their car if you are so concerned about it.

And driving the car on a dark side street going 20 mph doesn't count as driving it. So no, it really doesnt' count for ****.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #2242  
Gleason's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
yo, infinity, they actually let you test drive the EVO? dang, lucky .

The dealer on W. Henrietta here in rochester won't unless your practically already making a deposit on the car.

I say the clutch issue shouldnt play a major role in the decision of the car, as once you get better with stick, i doubt u'll notice it as much as you have now.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 01:11 PM
  #2243  
infin|ty's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally posted by mifesto
wait you test drove and you only stalked twice? twice is twice too often my friend .. no wonder they are nervous that ur driving it.. so would i
I stalled the STi and the salesman was extremely calm. He simply said start it again and it was fine. We drove on very busy streets and I was fine in it. For some reason I just wasn't having luck w/ 1st gear on the Evo.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 01:13 PM
  #2244  
infin|ty's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Yah Cortese is deffinetly tighter about their test drives, probably because they don't have a dedicated test car. Carlisle doesn't have to worry about you putting miles on one that will be sold.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 01:27 PM
  #2245  
JohnnyChimpo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Originally posted by infin|ty
For some reason I just wasn't having luck w/ 1st gear on the Evo.
Errr...umm...1st gear is usually the trickiest of five Just don't post later that you've fried your clutch with under 5k miles and then blame that the clutch sucks...ok. Good luck with your purchase!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 02:27 PM
  #2246  
WebDev's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
The salesman needs to get some ***** if he wants to make the sale. Making his customer feel comfortable with the car is paramount. He would have been better to laugh off the stalls and what not.

That said I do see the Evo being a little over the top for a first manual car, but whatever. My impression of the Evo after I tested it was that it was absolutely punishing on rough roads here in New England. I can't imagine it gets much better up in Rochester. The handling is superb and the power is great, but dang I would not want to daily drive that thing.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 02:54 PM
  #2247  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally posted by WebDev
The salesman needs to get some ***** if he wants to make the sale. Making his customer feel comfortable with the car is paramount.
You're kidding right? How can making someone feel comfortable substiture for driving ability? Making sure the seat is in the right place? The mirrors? The HVAC is on recirculate so the burning cosmoline smell doesn't get in the cabin?

Whatever.

Please call up my dealer and tell them not to let me drive their car if you are so concerned about it.
No, I won't. But it just sounds to me like you got an opportunity to do something a lot of others have been denied, but are complaining because things didn't quite the way you wanted. All I'm saying is it might have something to do with your driving ability (or lack of) rather then something your dealer did.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #2248  
Kayaalp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 2
From: NJ
Originally posted by Trollski
Simply adding psi, or bolting on lower stiffer springs to make the car more tarmac biased, would easily put it's on track performance beyond the Evo. The Evo on the other hand is rather one dimensional. It is designed for smooth track only, where it excels, but anything out of that box I believe the STi superior.
It's funny that's you'd call the Evo "one dimensional" for being tarmac biased. How many times do you drive your STi full-tilt on gravel roads? I don't doubt that a stock STi has an edge on deformable surfaces...but 99.9% of us are on tarmac 99.9% of the time.

Further, the reason the STi doesn't feel as good as the Evo is not just because of the stiffness of the springs! The STi has a slower steering rack that's pretty numb off-center. That won't be corrected just with springs! Sure, you could modify the STi's suspension (springs, shocks, camber plates, swaybars) to make the STi handle as well as the Evo...but you yourself said:

Originally posted by Trollski
I am not interested in living through the 1 in 100 owners who will modify the car to its maximum potential.
So, if you're comparing stock-for-stock, don't turn around and compare a modified STi to a stock Evo! An STi costs between 2-3K more than an Evo to begin with. Sure, you could spend another $1000 on suspension to make it feel as nice as a stock Evo. Of course, you could make a pretty sick Evo for the total cost of that modded STi.

Originally posted by Trollski
6) The throttle controlable movements of the nose using the front LSD is another advantage that an experienced driver could use to push his limits in a turn. The mag testers simply didn't have time to learn the car.
Don't know if I'd agree. All of my racing and driving instructor buddies hate "active" suspension and drivetrain components. Every "experienced driver" I know wants a car that's 100% predictable at the limit...and active crap gets in the way of that.

Originally posted by Trollski
9) The main deciding factor is the Evos turbo lag...Also, exiting a tight turn, if your Evo ends up in a flat spot, likely especially with the wide 5spd, you can do nothing but watch the STi pull away, with its low torque and tight-always there-gears.
That's fair. The STi definitely has less lag. However, I've never exited a corner an found the engine in a "flat spot." I suppose if you don't know how to heel-and-toe that might be a problem. There's enough headroom in each gear that you can easily keep the revs over 3K rpm (and the engine on boost) when cornering hard.

Emre
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 05:14 PM
  #2249  
Kayaalp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 2
From: NJ
Originally posted by Impreza01
The Spec C is for one thing, not set-up for understeer. It's sway bars (disappointed they put a front sway bar smaller than the regular US spec WRX) and (as you mentioned) spring rates are different.
Don't know why you'd want stiffer swaybars up front. The STi understeers enough as it is! Stiffening the front would make the problem worse. You need to stiffen the rear, not the front.

Emre
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 05:41 PM
  #2250  
KZEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
let me add my 2 cents

I was in the same position as you were and had the opportunity to drive both cars before i went with the Evo. I'm not sure why ppl say the EVo's interior is cheap. I personally like it better than STI....The STi seats are bad and handling is good, but can't compare to the EVO. Also as this was your first time driving a stick, you may not know much about the feel of the transmission etc. The EVO shifter is shorter, has a better feel (mechanical) and much better throws than the STi.

The brakes on the EVo are better than the STi. The STi folks complain about brake fade while i've yet to hear anyone say anything bad about the EVO brakes. I've seen the EVO perform on a road course and it's just unbelieve how bad it tears up the competition. The ride is definitely harsher than the STi, but then if u want handling u have to compromise some where.

Don't get me wrong, i like the STi a lot but i went with what gave me more driving / performance pleasure.

Also, the final factor i considered was that after talking to my performance shop manager they convinced me to go w/. the EVo due to all the factors i mentioned above but also that EVOs easier to modify and work on than the STi.

You need to consider what you want, straight line performance or both handling and straight line...The STi definitely feels really torquey due to its bigger engine. Besides all the articles i've read in the magazines have always given EVo the edge even though it's less HP.

I don't think you'll go wrong with either car, but just make sure you know what your preferences are before you buy it. ... good luck
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:37 AM.