View Poll Results: Choose which ones will influence your decision
Wow, 300hp, 300 ft-lbs from 2.5L Subaru boxer engine



152
22.25%
Proven tuning potential of the Mitsubishi 4G63



355
51.98%
Subaru\'s strong 6-speed manual tranny



138
20.20%
Mitsubishi\'s dependable 5-speed tranny



109
15.96%
DCCD on the STi... wish Evo had ACD



132
19.33%
Stock FMIC on the Evo



164
24.01%
Exterior looks



305
44.66%
Interior quality



148
21.67%
Gross Vehicle Weight



79
11.57%
I want to test drive both before deciding



165
24.16%
Price



261
38.21%
Body Shell Rigidity



133
19.47%
Brakes



163
23.87%
0 - 60 mph and 1/4 mile times



201
29.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 683. You may not vote on this poll
Evo vs. STI | Anything and Everything [ALL THREADS MERGED]
Re: Re: Evo vs STi, Part 2
Originally posted by boostCreep
maybe he was thinking ohh crap i hope he dosnt screw up this $27k car...remember your clutch frying driving lessons are goin on in a car that will eventually be bought by some1...he has to look out for his product
maybe he was thinking ohh crap i hope he dosnt screw up this $27k car...remember your clutch frying driving lessons are goin on in a car that will eventually be bought by some1...he has to look out for his product
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: dublin, oxford, chillicothe OH
Ok
i have both and heres my take
It really depends on what you want
I drive the evo daily and i have no problems at all. Its been modded since it had 1.8k on the clock (18500 right now) Modding the evo is so much easier and cheaper than the STi. Handling in the Sti is nothing like the evo. NOTHING! If you want the power of the Sti then use the money that you saved from buying the evo instead on mods. It should only take not much more than $500 to achieve this.
The Sti is very nice and is without a doubt much nicer than the evo. It is faster but again that can b fixed on the evo. But simple put, the evo has so much more potential than the Sti that its not even funny.
As for the ride, the Sti's really isnt much better. The suspension is actually stiffer and less forgiving than the evo. Its just that the seats soak up more than the evo's. Hitting bumps in the Sti will tire you to hell. Its really loud to drive on a highway with bumps. The evos seats support you so it doesnt seem as bad in the evo.
Insurance is cheaper on the evo too
i have both and heres my take
It really depends on what you want
I drive the evo daily and i have no problems at all. Its been modded since it had 1.8k on the clock (18500 right now) Modding the evo is so much easier and cheaper than the STi. Handling in the Sti is nothing like the evo. NOTHING! If you want the power of the Sti then use the money that you saved from buying the evo instead on mods. It should only take not much more than $500 to achieve this.
The Sti is very nice and is without a doubt much nicer than the evo. It is faster but again that can b fixed on the evo. But simple put, the evo has so much more potential than the Sti that its not even funny.
As for the ride, the Sti's really isnt much better. The suspension is actually stiffer and less forgiving than the evo. Its just that the seats soak up more than the evo's. Hitting bumps in the Sti will tire you to hell. Its really loud to drive on a highway with bumps. The evos seats support you so it doesnt seem as bad in the evo.
Insurance is cheaper on the evo too
Good luck finding aftermarket speakers for the STI. My fiance has an '04 WRX and I ordered a pair of Alpine 4" speakers for the rear doors and they didn't fit. I ordered them from crutchfield so I called and they said they sold me the set that fits the '03 WRX and they said they would fit. Aparently the '04's have different speakers from the factory and Crutchfield has nothing that will fit directly in the rear doors. Not to mention from '02 and up WRX they don't have anything that will replace the front doors because of the depth clearance. It looks like you are stuck with the factory options for the STI.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Re: Evo vs STi, Part 2
Originally posted by infin|ty
I only stalled twice....
I had a hard time w/ 1st gear, the car would buck really badly, I think I was not giving it enough throttle. Horrible test drive, it was dark, I wasn't having much luck w/ the clutch and the salesman was a sissy. I'm going back on Thursday for a REAL test drive and one of their sales managers better be there cause I'm sick of getting stuck w/ someone who knows nothing about the car on test drives.
I only stalled twice....
I had a hard time w/ 1st gear, the car would buck really badly, I think I was not giving it enough throttle. Horrible test drive, it was dark, I wasn't having much luck w/ the clutch and the salesman was a sissy. I'm going back on Thursday for a REAL test drive and one of their sales managers better be there cause I'm sick of getting stuck w/ someone who knows nothing about the car on test drives.
This dealer has an Evo just for test drives. It has over 3k miles on it.
You at least got to drive both of them, right? Doesn't that count for something?
Re: Re: Evo vs STi, Part 2
Originally posted by GPTourer
Sounds to me like you don't know how to drive. The saleman was probably nervous with you bucking around in first, stalling the car, and basically practicing your skills on a 30K piece of merchandise. So I guess its his fault because he didn't know anything about the car? He was probably too nervous worrying about you tearing up the car or having an accident with him in it.
So? They will still have to sell it. Mitsubishi doesn't refund dealers who turn cars into demos. And if it gets torn up they'll have to pay to have it fix. Parts aren't free and mecahnics like to feed their families too.
You at least got to drive both of them, right? Doesn't that count for something?
Sounds to me like you don't know how to drive. The saleman was probably nervous with you bucking around in first, stalling the car, and basically practicing your skills on a 30K piece of merchandise. So I guess its his fault because he didn't know anything about the car? He was probably too nervous worrying about you tearing up the car or having an accident with him in it.
So? They will still have to sell it. Mitsubishi doesn't refund dealers who turn cars into demos. And if it gets torn up they'll have to pay to have it fix. Parts aren't free and mecahnics like to feed their families too.
You at least got to drive both of them, right? Doesn't that count for something?
And driving the car on a dark side street going 20 mph doesn't count as driving it. So no, it really doesnt' count for ****.
yo, infinity, they actually let you test drive the EVO? dang, lucky
.
The dealer on W. Henrietta here in rochester won't unless your practically already making a deposit on the car.
I say the clutch issue shouldnt play a major role in the decision of the car, as once you get better with stick, i doubt u'll notice it as much as you have now.
. The dealer on W. Henrietta here in rochester won't unless your practically already making a deposit on the car.
I say the clutch issue shouldnt play a major role in the decision of the car, as once you get better with stick, i doubt u'll notice it as much as you have now.
Originally posted by mifesto
wait you test drove and you only stalked twice? twice is twice too often my friend .. no wonder they are nervous that ur driving it.. so would i
wait you test drove and you only stalked twice? twice is twice too often my friend .. no wonder they are nervous that ur driving it.. so would i
Yah Cortese is deffinetly tighter about their test drives, probably because they don't have a dedicated test car. Carlisle doesn't have to worry about you putting miles on one that will be sold.
Originally posted by infin|ty
For some reason I just wasn't having luck w/ 1st gear on the Evo.
For some reason I just wasn't having luck w/ 1st gear on the Evo.
Just don't post later that you've fried your clutch with under 5k miles and then blame
that the clutch sucks...ok. Good luck with your purchase!
The salesman needs to get some ***** if he wants to make the sale. Making his customer feel comfortable with the car is paramount. He would have been better to laugh off the stalls and what not.
That said I do see the Evo being a little over the top for a first manual car, but whatever. My impression of the Evo after I tested it was that it was absolutely punishing on rough roads here in New England. I can't imagine it gets much better up in Rochester. The handling is superb and the power is great, but dang I would not want to daily drive that thing.
That said I do see the Evo being a little over the top for a first manual car, but whatever. My impression of the Evo after I tested it was that it was absolutely punishing on rough roads here in New England. I can't imagine it gets much better up in Rochester. The handling is superb and the power is great, but dang I would not want to daily drive that thing.
Originally posted by WebDev
The salesman needs to get some ***** if he wants to make the sale. Making his customer feel comfortable with the car is paramount.
The salesman needs to get some ***** if he wants to make the sale. Making his customer feel comfortable with the car is paramount.
Whatever.
Please call up my dealer and tell them not to let me drive their car if you are so concerned about it.
Originally posted by Trollski
Simply adding psi, or bolting on lower stiffer springs to make the car more tarmac biased, would easily put it's on track performance beyond the Evo. The Evo on the other hand is rather one dimensional. It is designed for smooth track only, where it excels, but anything out of that box I believe the STi superior.
Simply adding psi, or bolting on lower stiffer springs to make the car more tarmac biased, would easily put it's on track performance beyond the Evo. The Evo on the other hand is rather one dimensional. It is designed for smooth track only, where it excels, but anything out of that box I believe the STi superior.
Further, the reason the STi doesn't feel as good as the Evo is not just because of the stiffness of the springs! The STi has a slower steering rack that's pretty numb off-center. That won't be corrected just with springs! Sure, you could modify the STi's suspension (springs, shocks, camber plates, swaybars) to make the STi handle as well as the Evo...but you yourself said:
Originally posted by Trollski
I am not interested in living through the 1 in 100 owners who will modify the car to its maximum potential.
I am not interested in living through the 1 in 100 owners who will modify the car to its maximum potential.
Originally posted by Trollski
6) The throttle controlable movements of the nose using the front LSD is another advantage that an experienced driver could use to push his limits in a turn. The mag testers simply didn't have time to learn the car.
6) The throttle controlable movements of the nose using the front LSD is another advantage that an experienced driver could use to push his limits in a turn. The mag testers simply didn't have time to learn the car.
Originally posted by Trollski
9) The main deciding factor is the Evos turbo lag...Also, exiting a tight turn, if your Evo ends up in a flat spot, likely especially with the wide 5spd, you can do nothing but watch the STi pull away, with its low torque and tight-always there-gears.
9) The main deciding factor is the Evos turbo lag...Also, exiting a tight turn, if your Evo ends up in a flat spot, likely especially with the wide 5spd, you can do nothing but watch the STi pull away, with its low torque and tight-always there-gears.
Emre
Originally posted by Impreza01
The Spec C is for one thing, not set-up for understeer. It's sway bars (disappointed they put a front sway bar smaller than the regular US spec WRX) and (as you mentioned) spring rates are different.
The Spec C is for one thing, not set-up for understeer. It's sway bars (disappointed they put a front sway bar smaller than the regular US spec WRX) and (as you mentioned) spring rates are different.
Emre
let me add my 2 cents
I was in the same position as you were and had the opportunity to drive both cars before i went with the Evo. I'm not sure why ppl say the EVo's interior is cheap. I personally like it better than STI....The STi seats are bad and handling is good, but can't compare to the EVO. Also as this was your first time driving a stick, you may not know much about the feel of the transmission etc. The EVO shifter is shorter, has a better feel (mechanical) and much better throws than the STi.
The brakes on the EVo are better than the STi. The STi folks complain about brake fade while i've yet to hear anyone say anything bad about the EVO brakes. I've seen the EVO perform on a road course and it's just unbelieve how bad it tears up the competition. The ride is definitely harsher than the STi, but then if u want handling u have to compromise some where.
Don't get me wrong, i like the STi a lot but i went with what gave me more driving / performance pleasure.
Also, the final factor i considered was that after talking to my performance shop manager they convinced me to go w/. the EVo due to all the factors i mentioned above but also that EVOs easier to modify and work on than the STi.
You need to consider what you want, straight line performance or both handling and straight line...The STi definitely feels really torquey due to its bigger engine. Besides all the articles i've read in the magazines have always given EVo the edge even though it's less HP.
I don't think you'll go wrong with either car, but just make sure you know what your preferences are before you buy it. ... good luck
I was in the same position as you were and had the opportunity to drive both cars before i went with the Evo. I'm not sure why ppl say the EVo's interior is cheap. I personally like it better than STI....The STi seats are bad and handling is good, but can't compare to the EVO. Also as this was your first time driving a stick, you may not know much about the feel of the transmission etc. The EVO shifter is shorter, has a better feel (mechanical) and much better throws than the STi.
The brakes on the EVo are better than the STi. The STi folks complain about brake fade while i've yet to hear anyone say anything bad about the EVO brakes. I've seen the EVO perform on a road course and it's just unbelieve how bad it tears up the competition. The ride is definitely harsher than the STi, but then if u want handling u have to compromise some where.
Don't get me wrong, i like the STi a lot but i went with what gave me more driving / performance pleasure.
Also, the final factor i considered was that after talking to my performance shop manager they convinced me to go w/. the EVo due to all the factors i mentioned above but also that EVOs easier to modify and work on than the STi.
You need to consider what you want, straight line performance or both handling and straight line...The STi definitely feels really torquey due to its bigger engine. Besides all the articles i've read in the magazines have always given EVo the edge even though it's less HP.
I don't think you'll go wrong with either car, but just make sure you know what your preferences are before you buy it. ... good luck


