500 hp DBB FP Red vs 500 6266
I didn't mean torque doesn't matter. I meant I don't see how it matters in a straight race especially if it's a roll race. Just my opinion. I'm assuming he wasn't referring to time attack or auto cross. Lets put it this way, I don't know why you would limit a 6266 to only 500hp but I know it takes very little psi(relative to a red) to get that power. So if this is some roll race, why would the red automatically be a faster car at the same power level versus a far larger turbo that takes less psi to make the same exact power? I'm not trying to be a smart *** I'm actually asking for learning purposes.
Fp red is over priced imo compared to what you can get a pte for that'll do the trick just fine as I posted earlier in this thread. That being said
1-fp red or compariable chargers.
2- assuming 2.0 is fully built id say 6266 since that's the charger you're comparing. But if it's built why not make more than 500 lol. A smaller charger on a built motor will run out of breath faster.
3- 6266 and I would go smaller yet if you're only looking for 500.
It honestly all just depends what you want to do. To
Many variables. But on stock motor you're wasting your time on a 6266
1-fp red or compariable chargers.
2- assuming 2.0 is fully built id say 6266 since that's the charger you're comparing. But if it's built why not make more than 500 lol. A smaller charger on a built motor will run out of breath faster.
3- 6266 and I would go smaller yet if you're only looking for 500.
It honestly all just depends what you want to do. To
Many variables. But on stock motor you're wasting your time on a 6266
Last edited by DagYo369; Aug 11, 2014 at 11:23 AM.
Fp red is over priced imo compared to what you can get a pte for that'll do the trick just fine as I posted earlier in this thread. That being said
1-fp red or compariable chargers.
2- assuming 2.0 is fully built id say 6266 since that's the charger you're comparing. But if it's built why not make more than 500 lol. A smaller charger on a built motor will run out of breath faster.
3- 6266 and I would go smaller yet if you're only looking for 500.
It honestly all just depends what you want to do. To
Many variables. But on stock motor you're wasting your time on a 6266
1-fp red or compariable chargers.
2- assuming 2.0 is fully built id say 6266 since that's the charger you're comparing. But if it's built why not make more than 500 lol. A smaller charger on a built motor will run out of breath faster.
3- 6266 and I would go smaller yet if you're only looking for 500.
It honestly all just depends what you want to do. To
Many variables. But on stock motor you're wasting your time on a 6266
IME I cant stand the way many stock framed turbo fall on their *** in upper RPM, I also hate a 3k rpm power band
Have to find a happy medium for sure. All in what you want. I have a 35r variant in the EVO and would never go back to any stock framed turbo at this point
Here's a stock block Evo VIII with some HKS 272 cams on 93oct at 29psi. Sure the power is decent, but that lag would drive me insane. Not even 200wtq at 4000rpm and peak torque doesn't hit until around 5700rpm.
Yep. Sure are but you sacrifice TQ.
IME I cant stand the way many stock framed turbo fall on their *** in upper RPM, I also hate a 3k rpm power band
Have to find a happy medium for sure. All in what you want. I have a 35r variant in the EVO and would never go back to any stock framed turbo at this point
IME I cant stand the way many stock framed turbo fall on their *** in upper RPM, I also hate a 3k rpm power band
Have to find a happy medium for sure. All in what you want. I have a 35r variant in the EVO and would never go back to any stock framed turbo at this point
I was looking into the 5858 or 6262 but got the dbb fp red low mileage of an buddy for cheap. Paid 1300 for the turbo, BR ported manifold and exhaust, ets intake and the dump and the DC downpipe. I couldn't pass on that haha.
Also I think I would be happy with the red for now especially on the stock block.
Also I think I would be happy with the red for now especially on the stock block.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...oct-29psi.html
Here's a stock block Evo VIII with some HKS 272 cams on 93oct at 29psi. Sure the power is decent, but that lag would drive me insane. Not even 200wtq at 4000rpm and peak torque doesn't hit until around 5700rpm.
Here's a stock block Evo VIII with some HKS 272 cams on 93oct at 29psi. Sure the power is decent, but that lag would drive me insane. Not even 200wtq at 4000rpm and peak torque doesn't hit until around 5700rpm.
I was looking into the 5858 or 6262 but got the dbb fp red low mileage of an buddy for cheap. Paid 1300 for the turbo, BR ported manifold and exhaust, ets intake and the dump and the DC downpipe. I couldn't pass on that haha.
Also I think I would be happy with the red for now especially on the stock block.
Also I think I would be happy with the red for now especially on the stock block.
Here is the link to my graph. https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...9-pte5858.html. Keep in mind it's a completely stock long block. 91 pump fuel at 16psi makes 410whp and on Ms109 with 28psi makes 530whp. Pulls good all the way
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
48
Jan 28, 2015 04:43 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
72
Aug 6, 2013 12:38 AM
JScocchio
Project Cars / Build Threads
21
Mar 21, 2013 06:28 PM







