Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

MAP EF2.5 tuned by Cobb Tuning - Plano

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 08:44 AM
  #121  
Jubey97's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Grand Prairie, Texas
Talking

Just got the ams downpipe, fuel pump, and injectors. Now waiting for the turbo to arrive . What numbers would be considered safe as far as tuning go for a stock bottom end? Psi, afr, whp, and wtq. I know most tuners tune for 11.5 afr at wot. If I ask for 11afr at wot, would that help the engine for reliability? Is 26 psi low enough to help the engine not to blow up? I do know a bit of power would be sacrificed, but I'm okay with that.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 08:49 AM
  #122  
Kracka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Let the tuner do his job and take care of those parameters. Make sure he knows your car is meant to be a reliable daily-driver. Who are you using for tuning?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 09:00 AM
  #123  
Jubey97's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Grand Prairie, Texas
Cobb Tuning in Plano. Turbo is the EF2.5 [QUOTE=Kracka;10619477]Let the tuner do his job and take care of those parameters. Make sure he knows your car is meant to be a reliable daily-driver. Who are you using for tuning?[/QUOTE
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 09:06 AM
  #124  
lowkey's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 1
From: Colleyville, TX
Originally Posted by Jubey97
Just got the ams downpipe, fuel pump, and injectors. Now waiting for the turbo to arrive . What numbers would be considered safe as far as tuning go for a stock bottom end? Psi, afr, whp, and wtq. I know most tuners tune for 11.5 afr at wot. If I ask for 11afr at wot, would that help the engine for reliability? Is 26 psi low enough to help the engine not to blow up? I do know a bit of power would be sacrificed, but I'm okay with that.
If COBB is going to tune your car, your best bet is to talk to Chris Fleming and set clear expectations. Luck of the draw, my motor popped at 405 whp / 379 ft-lb - this is risky business.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 09:16 AM
  #125  
candymanjl's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 1
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Originally Posted by Kracka
Let the tuner do his job and take care of those parameters. Make sure he knows your car is meant to be a reliable daily-driver. Who are you using for tuning?
What he said.

There's general guidelines but no blanket rules that always apply. Change in the AFR changes what timing numbers are "safe" since the burn rate changes. So many things effect other things. Go to a tuner with a good rep and pay him for his expertise.

All I'll throw in to that is timing and high cylinder pressures are what generally kill motors. For a daily driver I'd rather take out a little timing and lose 10-15hp than have a great dyno sheet and pop my motor.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 10:30 AM
  #126  
Jubey97's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Grand Prairie, Texas
Unhappy

Sorry to hear that. What gave? Too much torque maybe?
Originally Posted by lowkey
If COBB is going to tune your car, your best bet is to talk to Chris Fleming and set clear expectations. Luck of the draw, my motor popped at 405 whp / 379 ft-lb - this is risky business.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 11:20 AM
  #127  
Supraboy1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Allen
Originally Posted by lowkey
my motor popped at 405 whp / 379 ft-lb - this is risky business.
You had some strange issue and I think it would have occurred if you were bone stock. Maybe not. I had well over your limit and had no issues, and Chris has well over your limit with no issues either. Has Cobb ever really figured out what the problem was? How your car been fixed and what did it dyno?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 01:02 PM
  #128  
lowkey's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 1
From: Colleyville, TX
Originally Posted by Supraboy1
You had some strange issue
My wife will agree with you on that, but my car had some issues too.


Originally Posted by Supraboy1
and I think it would have occurred if you were bone stock.
Who knows, but when you double the hp, you have to be aware of the possible risk.

Originally Posted by Supraboy1
Has Cobb ever really figured out what the problem was? How your car been fixed and what did it dyno?
Undetermined. The motor is built. Here is my link:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ft-lb-e85.html
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2013 | 08:43 AM
  #129  
Jubey97's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Grand Prairie, Texas
Been trying to find in the search, but couldn't find if the Injen intake work with the ef2.5. Will I need the cobb inlet? Thanks in advanced.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2013 | 08:44 AM
  #130  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Ninja edit, you will need a 3" intake to match the turbo inlet provided.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2013 | 10:57 AM
  #131  
Kracka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Originally Posted by ChrisCarey
Ninja edit, you will need a 3" intake to match the turbo inlet provided.
Out of curiosity, if someone wanted a complete stealth appearance (CA guys for example), could the EF2.5 and EF3 retain the stock turbo inlet elbow? My measurements say yes, but I figured I'd ask the source for confirmation.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2013 | 12:39 PM
  #132  
NeedBoost!'s Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Great thread. I've been going back and forth between the EF2 and EF3 especially after talking with Nate at MAP. EF3 is a little "safer" according to him since torque is what kills motors - you can get more HP out of a bigger turbo without bumping up the TQ numbers like you would have to with a smaller one.

Loving your numbers though...
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2013 | 12:40 PM
  #133  
Kracka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
EF3 is not safer than an EF2 on the stock block. I pushed my EF2 to the limit and beyond their rating; doing that on an EF3 will window your block. The 2.5 is as large as I'd go on the stock block without having to intentionally detune your setup. If you buy something, you may as well be able to use it to it's fullest.

Last edited by Kracka; Jan 23, 2013 at 12:43 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2013 | 12:52 PM
  #134  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Kracka
EF3 is not safer than an EF2 on the stock block. I pushed my EF2 to the limit and beyond their rating; doing that on an EF3 will window your block. The 2.5 is as large as I'd go on the stock block without having to intentionally detune your setup. If you buy something, you may as well be able to use it to it's fullest.
I could window a block with an EF2

Lil E85, and 35psi! Boom.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2013 | 01:00 PM
  #135  
Kracka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
A bad tuner could window the block with no turbo, but I said detune, not retardtune
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:44 PM.