MAP EF2.5 tuned by Cobb Tuning - Plano
Just got the ams downpipe, fuel pump, and injectors. Now waiting for the turbo to arrive . What numbers would be considered safe as far as tuning go for a stock bottom end? Psi, afr, whp, and wtq. I know most tuners tune for 11.5 afr at wot. If I ask for 11afr at wot, would that help the engine for reliability? Is 26 psi low enough to help the engine not to blow up? I do know a bit of power would be sacrificed, but I'm okay with that.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Let the tuner do his job and take care of those parameters. Make sure he knows your car is meant to be a reliable daily-driver. Who are you using for tuning?
Cobb Tuning in Plano. Turbo is the EF2.5 [QUOTE=Kracka;10619477]Let the tuner do his job and take care of those parameters. Make sure he knows your car is meant to be a reliable daily-driver. Who are you using for tuning?[/QUOTE
Just got the ams downpipe, fuel pump, and injectors. Now waiting for the turbo to arrive . What numbers would be considered safe as far as tuning go for a stock bottom end? Psi, afr, whp, and wtq. I know most tuners tune for 11.5 afr at wot. If I ask for 11afr at wot, would that help the engine for reliability? Is 26 psi low enough to help the engine not to blow up? I do know a bit of power would be sacrificed, but I'm okay with that.
There's general guidelines but no blanket rules that always apply. Change in the AFR changes what timing numbers are "safe" since the burn rate changes. So many things effect other things. Go to a tuner with a good rep and pay him for his expertise.
All I'll throw in to that is timing and high cylinder pressures are what generally kill motors. For a daily driver I'd rather take out a little timing and lose 10-15hp than have a great dyno sheet and pop my motor.
You had some strange issue and I think it would have occurred if you were bone stock. Maybe not. I had well over your limit and had no issues, and Chris has well over your limit with no issues either. Has Cobb ever really figured out what the problem was? How your car been fixed and what did it dyno?
My wife will agree with you on that, but my car had some issues too.
Who knows, but when you double the hp, you have to be aware of the possible risk.
Undetermined. The motor is built. Here is my link:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ft-lb-e85.html
Who knows, but when you double the hp, you have to be aware of the possible risk.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ft-lb-e85.html
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Out of curiosity, if someone wanted a complete stealth appearance (CA guys for example), could the EF2.5 and EF3 retain the stock turbo inlet elbow? My measurements say yes, but I figured I'd ask the source for confirmation.
Great thread. I've been going back and forth between the EF2 and EF3 especially after talking with Nate at MAP. EF3 is a little "safer" according to him since torque is what kills motors - you can get more HP out of a bigger turbo without bumping up the TQ numbers like you would have to with a smaller one.
Loving your numbers though...
Loving your numbers though...
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
EF3 is not safer than an EF2 on the stock block. I pushed my EF2 to the limit and beyond their rating; doing that on an EF3 will window your block. The 2.5 is as large as I'd go on the stock block without having to intentionally detune your setup. If you buy something, you may as well be able to use it to it's fullest.
Last edited by Kracka; Jan 23, 2013 at 12:43 PM.
EF3 is not safer than an EF2 on the stock block. I pushed my EF2 to the limit and beyond their rating; doing that on an EF3 will window your block. The 2.5 is as large as I'd go on the stock block without having to intentionally detune your setup. If you buy something, you may as well be able to use it to it's fullest.
Lil E85, and 35psi! Boom.


